What is the overall opinion on DeRozan?
I'm a Wolves fan and we desperately are in need of a 2 guard, I came up with a trade scenario where the Wolves got Derozan, the Kings got Calderon and Johnson and the raptors got Cousins/Ridnour/Wes Johnson/Beasley/Randolph (Beas and Randolph=cap clearing contracts) and Utah and Memphis lotto protected picks. There was more too it, but that was the general gist. Is Derozan near untouchable from Raps point of view? Is he a core guy? Is it kind of up in the air? What do Raptor fans
Maybe that wouldn't be a trade you are interested in, but I am curious to gauge the overall opinion of Raptors fans and what they think the opinion of DD in TOR FO is?
I personally really like him as a player, he has a few limitations but they are seemingly becoming less and less with every year. He is very strong at penetration and seems to play solid enough defense.
30 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
I'd say he was bordering on untouchable before the season started.
But as of right now, there is a lot of frustration in the T Dot, over how DeRozan has performed this season. I think many here will agree though that it’s not worth trading someone with his potential based on his performance in a shortened season with so much weirdness injected into every single player’s personal and team preperation for this year.
On the flip side, Calderon is probably more valued by the fanbase right now than DeRozan. He is the engineer and driver of our most potent offensive line-up and we’re yet to see any PG come close to getting our scorers… scoring, at a level we want them to. Calderon is also consistently ranked (when healthy) in the top 5-10 when it comes to assists per game and in firmly in the top five when it comes to assist to turnover ratio.
I don’t expect either of these players to be moved this year, Calderon will most likely be kept for the duration of his contract and then resigned at a slightly lower rate. DeRozan I imagine would most likely be moved at the trade deadline during his last year, if his progression does not improve drastically between now and then.
Formerly known as timboslice85
by Rebrand_the_Raps on Jan 10, 2012 1:04 PM EST reply actions
Interesting
I’m a Wolves fan and I have to say I am very impressed with your squad.
Casey has you guys looking like a very very disciplined team and you are really a SF away from a very complete starting 5.
Very curious to see how JoVal fits in with the plans as you could have a pretty imposing Bargs/JoVal frontcourt for teams to deal with
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
Hopefuly we'll address the hole at the SF position through the draft.
Either we’ll end up with a high pick and a chance of getting Barnes or Michael-Gilchrist naturally, or we can trade up to get those good picks in the draft. With recent performances in mind, Ed Davis could be part of netting us a high pick in the draft, if we continue to play decent for the rest of the season that is.
Formerly known as timboslice85
by Rebrand_the_Raps on Jan 10, 2012 2:47 PM EST up reply actions
untouchable
I believe the last 25-30 games of this season, he will be dominant. Third year player, so the game should slow down for him soon, and when he’s fading, falling or being fouled he finishes, still. We’ve only played a handful of games, so offensively no ones really hot yet, but i’ve seen Demar walk around some defenders trying to take charges, he was always sure to dip that shoulder and force it before going baseline. Now he recognizes defenses very good now, finds Bargnani after attracting defenderS or he goes around you if your not interested in blocking the ball. He has a post up game he’s using 1 on 1 instead of going baseline, and he’s developed a spin both ways, both hands that he’s using in his complete arsenal like the 360 into a fadeaway for a bucket. My tip for him is shoot away, he tries rookie passes at the top of his jumpshot, shoot. His D will improve in his 4th year.
Notice for the entire NBA if there’s a lengthy, talented, SG available in the draft to grow with Jonas and everything above doesn’t happen consistently for that second half of the season, he will be available. Till then you’d need an allstar to take him from us.
N
Have you watched this season....
We’ve only played a handful of games, so offensively no ones really hot yet,
Bargnani is on fire offensively. lol.
He is averagain less than 2 assists per game and more turnovers per game than last year. How does that show he is recognizing defences?
Now he recognizes defenses very good now, finds Bargnani after attracting defenderS or he goes around you if your not interested in blocking the ball.
His ppg, apg, rpg are all down, his turnovers are up and fg% is down.
What post game does he have?
I’ll agree he’s almost untouchable but what a horrible scouting report on Derozan. He has shown great improvement in his game each year, specifically shooting; now shooting the 3 comfortable. However, there hasn’t been great improvement else where in his game from last year and he is struggling to play off the ball. Our offence runs through Bargnani and PnR with Jose and Demar is having trouble adapting to that. Even tonight 4-16…..yikes, against the wizards, needless Young isn’t a lock down defender. Until Derozan tightens his handle he won’t reach his potential. With the new rules being able to break your man down off the bounce n get to the rim is vital for 2 men. In fact for being as athletic as he is he rarely beats his man to the hoop in the half court.
Right now Demar is shooting 40% from 2, definitely needs to improve. Any idea how many dunks he has this year? I’ll tell you ….4.
Bargnani on fire
the only difference in the big mans game is that he’s crashing the boards a bit more, still not aggresive enough. Still would rather shoot than work to gain position. the little extra offence your seeing is a result of not playing center, you mention the wizards game, well he had no problems scoring against Booker on him, but he didn’t fare well with Mcgee or even Vesely on him. He has to stop asking for the ball 15 ft. away from the basket. Awful in second halfs.
As for Demar, Butler has cost him 3 assists easy and JJ another 2 per game. Off the ball there asking him to 1) screen for Andrea to get Andrea position, 2) use screens to get the ball from jose to pass it into Andrea, 3) when Jose and Andrea run the high pick and roll, to spot up as a shooter. How is he bad off the ball? Yes he missed shots last night, yes our offence is a high pick and roll with Jose and Andrea( which they should bury till 4th quarters), but Demar is playing excellent. Stop looking at the stats, pay attention to the defenses. Bargnani is still being defended 1 on 1 and Demar attracts double teams continuosly. He got fouled a few times in that 1st half but the refs wanted to keep the wiz in it, so no calls. Bargnani was a no show in the third and Demar was 3 for 6, before they both sat for the game. Considering most of the plays in the third were called for Andrea, Demar played great, he even found 3 steals. Why is Amir at Center? Answer: Bargnani not tough enough. Who plays harder? Bargnani would rather watch euroleague. Sad for an italian his defensive instincts stink.
Again, do you watch the games....
Bargnani was a no show in the third and Demar was 3 for 6, before they both sat for the game.
Actually Bargnani scored 10 points in the third quarter which is almost Derozan’s production for the whole game and definitely more than his third quarter. Did you watch the game?
the only difference in the big mans game is that he’s crashing the boards a bit more, still not aggresive enough. Still would rather shoot than work to gain position. the little extra offence your seeing is a result of not playing center, you mention the wizards game, well he had no problems scoring against Booker on him, but he didn’t fare well with Mcgee or even Vesely on him. He has to stop asking for the ball 15 ft. away from the basket. Awful in second halfs.
If he is as perimeter oriented as you are saying why does he have more dunks on the year than Derozan and score more closer in. Bargnani is scoring 32% of his points inside the paint and close to the hoop, while derozan is scoring 30% of his points inside or close to the hoop. Right now he is the 8th leading scorer in the NBA, and doing it on less shots than everyone ahead of him, and at at higher % than everyone except Lebron and Blake. He is also top 10 in FTA and 8th in FTM. . A total of 8 of his ppg come from in close or at the rim and another 5 come from the FT line, definitely sounds like a perimeter oriented player. While he may not post up he isn’t settling for jump shots. That definitely sounds like a guy who is settling for his jump shots when over half his points are in the paint or the FT line. So scoring at one of the highest and most efficient rates in the nba doesn’t constitute being hot?
Why is Amir at Center? Answer: Bargnani not tough enough. Who plays harder? Bargnani would rather watch euroleague. Sad for an italian his defensive instincts stink.What does this have to do with anything involving Bargnani and Amir. It sounds like a child throwing a temper tantrum because he can’t make a reasonable argument. He isn’t Center and that has helped the team play better, Andrea to play better and Amir is playing outstanding at C. Obviosuly amir players harder but is he as offensively talented? Absolutely not, and while he may be the leader on the Defensive end it is obvious who is our leader on the Offensive end. Well obvious to anyone reasonable.
As for Demar, Butler has cost him 3 assists easy and JJ another 2 per game.
He should be averaging close to 7apg? Which would put him top 15 in the league. Do I really need to even respond to that? If Demar Derozan could shoot 100% we would never lose. That is the equivalent to what you are saying.
Stop looking at the stats, pay attention to the defenses. Bargnani is still being defended 1 on 1 and Demar attracts double teams continuosly.
Driving and getting help is not the same as being double teamed. Teams don’t need to double Demar because he can’t beat his man off the dribble consistently the majority of the time he gets to the rim off ball movement and screens. Its improving but he is not anywhere near a top flight shooting guard in the NBA.
He got fouled a few times in that 1st half but the refs wanted to keep the wiz in it, so no calls.Really? That is actually your argument, the refs were against us? I believe that is called whining like a little b****.
I wouldn’t need to use stats if you didn’t miss the obvious. A perfect example of that is, Bargnani did nothing in the third, when in fact he out scored Demar. If Demar went 3-6 in the third quarter, he went 1-10 in the first half. Right now every statistic for him is down except turnovers, which is actually help. He actually has a negative assist to turnover ratio. While he definitely is in our plan for the future he has regressed this year in every aspect except three point shooting.
I guess my questions are really simple…
What would constitute an NBA player being hot offensively, (if not doing it efficiently and at close to the highest rate in the NBA)?
If Derozan’s offensive awareness and passing ability are so high why is he averaging more turnovers than assists?
If Bargnani is settling so much for jump shots why are over 50% of his points in the paint or at the free throw line?
If Derozan is playing so excellent why is he shooting 40% from the field and having such an inconsistent season (25% shooting the last 4 games and only 9 free throw attempts)?
This is how it should be.
Bargnani was a no show in the third and Demar was 3 for 6, before they both sat for the game.
Actually Bargnani scored 10 points in the third quarter which is almost Derozan’s production for the whole game and definitely more than his third quarter. Did you watch the game?
the only difference in the big mans game is that he’s crashing the boards a bit more, still not aggresive enough. Still would rather shoot than work to gain position. the little extra offence your seeing is a result of not playing center, you mention the wizards game, well he had no problems scoring against Booker on him, but he didn’t fare well with Mcgee or even Vesely on him. He has to stop asking for the ball 15 ft. away from the basket. Awful in second halfs.
If he is as perimeter oriented as you are saying why does he have more dunks on the year than Derozan and score more closer in. Bargnani is scoring 32% of his points inside the paint and close to the hoop, while derozan is scoring 30% of his points inside or close to the hoop. Right now he is the 8th leading scorer in the NBA, and doing it on less shots than everyone ahead of him, and at at higher % than everyone except Lebron and Blake. He is also top 10 in FTA and 8th in FTM. . A total of 8 of his ppg come from in close or at the rim and another 5 come from the FT line, definitely sounds like a perimeter oriented player. While he may not post up he isn’t settling for jump shots. That definitely sounds like a guy who is settling for his jump shots when over half his points are in the paint or the FT line. So scoring at one of the highest and most efficient rates in the nba doesn’t constitute being hot?
Why is Amir at Center? Answer: Bargnani not tough enough. Who plays harder? Bargnani would rather watch euroleague. Sad for an italian his defensive instincts stink.
What does this have to do with anything involving Bargnani and Amir. It sounds like a child throwing a temper tantrum because he can’t make a reasonable argument. He isn’t Center and that has helped the team play better, Andrea to play better and Amir is playing outstanding at C. Obviosuly amir players harder but is he as offensively talented? Absolutely not, and while he may be the leader on the Defensive end it is obvious who is our leader on the Offensive end. Well obvious to anyone reasonable.
As for Demar, Butler has cost him 3 assists easy and JJ another 2 per game.
He should be averaging close to 7apg? Which would put him top 15 in the league. Do I really need to even respond to that? If Demar Derozan could shoot 100% we would never lose. That is the equivalent to what you are saying.
Stop looking at the stats, pay attention to the defenses. Bargnani is still being defended 1 on 1 and Demar attracts double teams continuosly.
Driving and getting help is not the same as being double teamed. Teams don’t need to double Demar because he can’t beat his man off the dribble consistently the majority of the time he gets to the rim off ball movement and screens. Its improving but he is not anywhere near a top flight shooting guard in the NBA.
He got fouled a few times in that 1st half but the refs wanted to keep the wiz in it, so no calls.
Really? That is actually your argument, the refs were against us? I believe that is called whining like a little b****.
I wouldn’t need to use stats if you didn’t miss the obvious. A perfect example of that is, Bargnani did nothing in the third, when in fact he out scored Demar. If Demar went 3-6 in the third quarter, he went 1-10 in the first half. Right now every statistic for him is down except turnovers, which is actually help. He actually has a negative assist to turnover ratio. While he definitely is in our plan for the future he has regressed this year in every aspect except three point shooting.
I guess my questions are really simple…
What would constitute an NBA player being hot offensively, (if not doing it efficiently and at close to the highest rate in the NBA)?
If Derozan’s offensive awareness and passing ability are so high why is he averaging more turnovers than assists?
If Bargnani is settling so much for jump shots why are over 50% of his points in the paint or at the free throw line?
If Derozan is playing so excellent why is he shooting 40% from the field and having such an inconsistent season (25% shooting the last 4 games and only 9 free throw attempts)?
If it helps the Raptors by playing Bargnani at PF and Amir at C why wouldn’t they do that? So why does his toughness as a C even matter?
What does this have to do with anything involving Bargnani and Amir
Should be Derozan instead of Amir
Wow...
That was the most perfect breakdown ever. I must give you props for that. Couldn’t have said it any better.
by keepit4real on Jan 12, 2012 12:35 AM EST up reply actions
where do i start
your originial post started off with a mention of Bargnani and your disagreement with my statement that in a handful of games no one is considered “hot”. So we’ll talk Bargnani first. I did watch the game, and after 3 quarters of a Bargnani led offence we were sitting our starters. Pay attention to defenses, everyone driving is facing help defense, no one is double teaming him, Cousins stripped him twice in a minute last night and he went 1 for 10 in the first half he played. I l enjoy your love for stats “Bargnani is scoring 32% of his points inside the paint and close to the hoop, while derozan is scoring 30% of his points inside or close to the hoop.” 32% for a 7footer who should be down low and is getting 2/3 rds of the offensive plays being called for him vs Demars 30% who gets his by driving or running out in the open court isn’t even fair to compare. Two different positions.
“obviously Amir plays harder”, same as me saying he’s not aggresive enough, aggresive is not, to challenge a defender, beat him and pull up at the free throw line for a jumper. Off the ball he doesn’t aggresively rebound, block out, or defend in the post BEFORE and after the ball arrives, never too mention he’s a no-show as the help defense. if he played as hard as Amir, he’d be the starting center.
Your original argument about Derozan was his assist defiency and i was tooting about his post game confidence and ability to read defenses. I asked you to pay attention to defenses, they double team Derozan, and even more in the fourth quarters. But we disagree here, you say he’s not being double teamed, its just help defense. The rare times they call an ISO for him, he’s getting good shots off the rare times they don’t double him. Also he sees the zone defense forming and goes right at them. Stats never support effort and intangibles, one of which is guards like Demar and JJ who look like there away from their man, but they’re helping out Andrea all the time and get sucked in. As for assists First play vs Sacremento, i see Derozan attract a double, kicks out to Andrea who misses an open 3. Your stats don’t cover those.
Now your questions
What would constitute an NBA player being hot offensively, (if not doing it efficiently and at close to the highest rate in the NBA)?
A player is hot when his team is winning from his direct offensive play over a period of time, longer than a handful of games. Toronto’s defence seemed like we were starting hot, maybe Bargnani’s jumper was hot for a game or two, but a career high 31 point game doesn’t make him hot, Kobe’s had a 42 point night and he’s just heating up with some consistency, Andrea can’t stay on the floor.
If Derozan’s offensive awareness and passing ability are so high why is he averaging more turnovers than assists?
Derozan turnovers are low considering the doubles he attracts. Shooters missing WIDE open shots after Derozan finds them is huge contributor to his low assist total, also the lack of ISO’s they call for him. When you drive to the net and four sets of hands hack at you, no call and the ball goes out of bounds, they count that as a turnover.
If Bargnani is settling so much for jump shots why are over 50% of his points in the paint or at the free throw line?
Bargnani pump fakes, gets bad defenders off their feet. why? because he shoots so often, when he goes around the defender, he stops at the top of the key and shoots. That’s not points in the paint. The slams he does get, is from blown pick and roll coverages. You don’t see him overpower anyone in the post, he never cleans up on the offensive boards like Amir does aka Dwight Howard. The few times he is aggresive, he makes up his mind and goes, there’s no feel to it, that’s why he’s good for a couple offensive fouls a game, and a few blocking fouls called his way for free throws.
If Derozan is playing so excellent why is he shooting 40% from the field and having such an inconsistent season (25% shooting the last 4 games and only 9 free throw attempts)?
They’re not calling ISO’s for Demar, and when they do the other players are not reacting to the double, they should move into passing lanes for him, instead they freeze and it forces Demar to force something. They call some catch and shoot plays for him, but he’s not Ray Allen. No one else can drive and dish to him when he spots up as a shooter, the few times Jose finds him they haven’t fell, but keep shooting they will.
If it helps the Raptors by playing Bargnani at PF and Amir at C why wouldn’t they do that? So why does his toughness as a C even matter?
Amir is a great PF defensively, but he’s at center because Bargnani can’t be. So now we’re undersized at center, and our PF defence is par. That’s better than par defence with size at center and excellent PF defence?
Look i like Bargnani, i just think our offence needs to go around Demar, as i said before, i only expect dominance from Demar in the second half of the season. I hope Andrea’s healthy but if not it might force the dino’s to start working around Derozan
its like you enjoy punishment...
where to begin….
lets start with usage courtesy of mr hollinger from espn. Usage percentage is an estimate of the percentage of team plays used by a player while he was on the floor.
Bargnani’s is 25.4% (actually second on our team behind Barbosa), Derozan is third at 21.5%. The raptors avg 92.8 possessions per game which means Bargnani gets 23.5 possessions of use and DD gets 20 possessions. Only 3.5 possession difference. Yet Bargnani’s per (The player efficiency rating (PER) is a rating of a player’s per-minute productivity.) is twice as high!! Bargnani 22 vs DD 11.6. If there usage is so similar why the difference in production? OOO Derozan is stuck at the end of the shot clock right?
Derozan takes 17% of his shots with 21+ seconds on the clock, Bargnani takes 17% as well. HOWEVER, Bargnani is making over 50% of these shots with 60% assisted on. While Derozan is making 23% of these shots with 70% assisted on. If both players are taking the same percentage at the end of the clock why is there such a discrepancy?
If Bargnani is settling so much for jump shots why are over 50% of his points in the paint or at the free throw line?
Bargnani pump fakes, gets bad defenders off their feet. why? because he shoots so often, when he goes around the defender, he stops at the top of the key and shoots. That’s not points in the paint. The slams he does get, is from blown pick and roll coverages. You don’t see him overpower anyone in the post, he never cleans up on the offensive boards like Amir does aka Dwight Howard. The few times he is aggresive, he makes up his mind and goes, there’s no feel to it, that’s why he’s good for a couple offensive fouls a game, and a few blocking fouls called his way for free throws
So points in the paint only count if they are overpowering dunks? He’s good for a couple of offensive fouls a game? He only averages 1.6 per game. Last I saw the number he had through 7 games was 3. In fact he’s great at avoiding the charge for a 7 footer. Which is why in fact he rarely gets called for charges. I’d love for you to back track and find me all his charges this year . It should be easy cause according to you there is 20 (a couple a game). He avgs 8ppg in the paint, 5 from the ft line and 3 from 3 point line accounting for 16 of his 23 ppg. Where are all these pull up jumpers? Whats wrong with a good jump shooter anyways, especially when he gets his shot blocked less than 2% of the time and makes 50%, while still attacking the defence and getting to the free throw line. He obviously can’t be settling too much if he is 9th in the NBA for free throws made. He has made more free throws than Amare, Aldridge, Gasol, Blake Griffin and Dwight Howard!!!!! Explain how he is settling when he has made more free throws than all of those players?
Your original argument about Derozan was his assist defiency and i was tooting about his post game confidence and ability to read defenses. I asked you to pay attention to defenses, they double team Derozan, and even more in the fourth quarters. But we disagree here, you say he’s not being double teamed, its just help defense. The rare times they call an ISO for him, he’s getting good shots off the rare times they don’t double him. Also he sees the zone defense forming and goes right at them. Stats never support effort and intangibles, one of which is guards like Demar and JJ who look like there away from their man, but they’re helping out Andrea all the time and get sucked in. As for assists First play vs Sacremento, i see Derozan attract a double, kicks out to Andrea who misses an open 3. Your stats don’t cover those.
Congrats, he got him a 3. NBA players shoot an avg of 40% from there if they are good, not everyone is suppose to go in. It still doesn’t explain why if he is so good his turnovers are up. To quote the greatest pg, Magic, “There’s a difference between making a pass to somebody and creating a shot for a guy.” All he does is make the simple pass, he doesn’t create a shot with some spectacular passing ability, players who avg 7 assists (which you suggested) create shots for their teammates. Derozan doesn’t create a shot he makes a pass. I also don’t understand why he would go at the zone? Wouldn’t the smart play to be to find the open man, instead of forcing a drive.
No one else can drive and dish to him when he spots up as a shooter, the few times Jose finds him they haven’t fell, but keep shooting they will.
Think about that, you are saying its ok for him to miss Jose’s passes but then criticize Bargnani for missing ? That is actually a perfect example of a bias opinion or hypocracy. Either missing shots is part of basketball and shouldn’t be counted against people (like Bargnani) or Derozan needs to man up and hit a shot.
Derozan turnovers are low considering the doubles he attracts. Shooters missing WIDE open shots after Derozan finds them is huge contributor to his low assist total, also the lack of ISO’s they call for him. When you drive to the net and four sets of hands hack at you, no call and the ball goes out of bounds, they count that as a turnover.
Really we are back to whining and blaming the refs for foul calls? There are fouls every play from both teams, offensively and defensively. Suck it up, if you don’t like contact go play tennis or hit the weight room.
A player is hot when his team is winning from his direct offensive play over a period of time, longer than a handful of games.
This is just such a bias definition to try and win a point, its childish. I mean back in 2004-05 Kobe avg 28ppg was second in the NBA in scoring, but the Lakers were awful and finishing 34-48 and missed the playoffs. So Kobe wasn’t hot? One player being hot has nothing to do with his teams record, what if his team is awful for him to be efficient is even harder because teams can focus in on them. Look at Pau his ppg haven’t changed since coming to LA but his fg% has. To be efficient and produce at a high level on weak teams is very tough because defenses can focus on you.
I enjoy perspective, Bargnani had 8 points in the first half….that’s Derozan’s avg for the last 5 games (actually he’s 8.8). Think about that, you are criticizing a half by Bargnani, thats 5 games or half the season for Derozan. This is the guy you want to run our offence through? When he already gets similar usage to Andrea but putting up half the value.
Cousins stripped him twice in a minute last night and he went 1 for 10 in the first half he played.
What you have basically written is that Demar Derozan is not responsible for his turnovers because the refs don’t call fouls, its ok for him to miss shots but his teammates costs him assists, and we need to run more isolations for him even when he makes poor decisions when passing, as seen by his CAREER negative assist to turnover ratio. At what point is he accountable for his own poor play and not the refs or his teammates.
Liking a player has nothing to do with being realistic about their play. Can Derozan be an elite wing, possibly if he puts in the work but he isn’t plain and simple. He isn’t even a top 2 option on a weak team and not only do the numbers back it up but his play does. When Derozan is on the floor the team is a negative -0.9. Not only do the numbers tell his story but his game does. All you’ve done is created excuses for him but the fact is his play doesn’t lie and so far he has been inconsistent and poor.
Reading your breakdowns is very interesting and gives a new perspective in my eyes. DD is my favorite player too, but I can easily see his flaws in the game. I really believe DD can become an elite two-guard (6’6 Guard, Crazy Athleticism, Nice Jumpshot, etc.), but the fact is that he is not RIGHT NOW. Maybe in the future, but as of right now, he still has much work to do.
that's all my point is...
I even said earlier in the year I think he has the potential to be a franchise type player where Bargnani doesn’t. But as of right now he isn’t and has a lot of polish that has to be added to his game.
Bargnani has polished his game up alot more and is proving he can be a legit #2 or 3 option on a good basketball team.
Derozan does not create any opportuniteis for his teammates, which is proven by the fact he has 1 assist in the last 4 games.
DeRozan
Is likely to be a serviceable part on a good team but I don’t see him as being an all-star. I see him as evolving to become a poor man’s Rip Hamilton. That being said, I would not trade him this year because I think he will be far more valuable next off-season or in the middle of his 4th season and the Raptors are offensively challenged enough that they would miss his inconsistent offense this year.
So, I don’t think he is untouchable, but the offer would have to be pretty high to get him.
BTW, which Johnson was in that proposed trade? Amir is pretty much untouchable right now (both because of his play and also his now team-friendly contract) but James could be had easily enough.
I still don’t like that trade because the Raptors end up with two mid-1st picks (I don’t count the bad contracts, young guys with attitude or attention problems, or filler) for a very good core player (assuming the Johnson is Amir) and a useful PG. If the picks weren’t lottery protected, it’s a bit closer to consideration.
The trade I came up with
was more of a Wolves dream than anything.
Didn’t realize you guys liked Amir Johnson’s deal? Didn’t he sign a 5/40 deal last season? And you are all happy with it? By all means if it works it works but that was a deal I did not think was an overly great one at the time.
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I loved Amir's deal at the time
And I still do. I loved it at the time because I saw that Amir was expanding his game to add a jumper and I thought he’d begin to control his fouling. I saw this deal as buying early to get him while he was still relatively cheap.
I have no doubt that Amir would get a lot more money these days if he was on the open market.
DD's struggles are not entirely his fault
The wretched shooting from the Raps’ SFs (Butler & J. Johnson) has allowed opposing defences to back off, thereby giving DD little room to move. I like him; he’s still young. Let’s not panic after only 9 games. I say keep DeMar, & find a SF who can get some points.
P.S. Amir Johnson’s deal was pricey, yes, but he’s been a warrior. Bad hands will forever limit his potential, but he’s earned his spot on the starting lineup for his rebounding, defence & hustle.
by Newmarket Brian on Jan 10, 2012 2:42 PM EST reply actions
good to know
AJ was an outsiders perspective and it is actually kind of cool that you guys like him
I don't know what an art house is, I don't know what goes on in an art house, I have never been in an art house, and I can't imagine it's any place I ever want to be.
I Like DD
DD is my favorite on the team because of his athleticism and driving ability. He has a gift to get it to the rim. However, he has a lot more to improve on. The great thing is, he knows he can improve. His 3pt game is a new and improved factor for DD, and really helps him spread the floor now. I would keep him for his potential, rather than for his skill right now. I think he can become something great in the future. We just need to give him some time.
I think DD should very much be tradeable, but if the choice is between DD and the players the Raps would get in that deal, no doubt I’d want to keep Derozan.
The Raps aren’t (or shouldn’t be) in a position to give up youth/potential for other peoples trash, vets and headcases. (That doesn’t even touch including Calderon and Amir in the deal.)
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Jan 10, 2012 6:47 PM EST reply actions
A simpler idea
Would we trade DD for Cousins?
After watching Casey deal with Andrea and watching Cousins kill us on the boards, I would have trouble saying no to this deal at this time. Cousins’ upside seems greater than DD at this point in time.
Agreed
But the article asked if we would trade DD? For Cousins, I would trade him and try to make “the headache” play up to his potential.
I like DD
But find me a GM in this league that wouldn’t trade DD for Cousins…do you think there is one out there?
Barrea
And why they signed JJ makes no sense to me…none.
Khan is so full of himself he obviously can’t listen to others very well. He borders on moronic.

by 





















