The HQ Round Table Part III - The Draft, and the Future of the Toronto Raptors
In the final piece of their roundtable, the HQ looks at the near and not so near future of the Dinos...
And finally...
After two days of recapping the season that was here, and here, we move on to the last piece of our annual RHQ round-table.
In the final part, we do a little crystal-ball gazing...
5. Franchise: I too think we're in for a shortened season as well, which I think has some potentially positive and negative repercussions for the Raptors and their fans. As for BC and his crew, I think a shortened season will increase the likelihood of everyone coming back.
Let's turn to the draft, a big one for TO considering they have the third-best chance in the league at the number one spot.
Where do you think they'll end up picking from and should they land the top pick, who would you like to see them select?
Howland: Early on in this process there seems to be consensus among the draft gurus that this is a two person draft with Williams and Irving. The hope then is an obvious one - be in the top two. I would be more than satisfied with either of these players. If the Raps do fall outside the top two all is not lost however. More and more it looks like this draft can be dubbed the "international draft". Take a look at DraftExpress.com and you will see that many of the top prospects this year are international players - Valanciunas, Biyombo, Kanter, Vesely, Kanter, Motiejunas, Mirotic, etc. The Raptors should have a distinct advantage in this draft given their knowledge and connections on the international scene. Can the Raptors leverage that knowledge if they are outside the top two? There will likely be broad range of opinions on this crop of prospects and will likely be one where no teams draft board looks the same. The issue with such an international draft is very few people will be able to given an educated opinion on a certain prospect - these guys don't show up on Sat night ESPN games or on the sports pack. If the Raptors are outside the top two an incredible amount of faith will need to be placed in the hands of those who make the selection. It is all fine and good to read about Bismack Biyombo, his shot blocking abilities, his Kevin Garnett like attitude and his incredible wingspan but can the guy become a legitimate player? For this reason alone I can't help but wonder if the Bryan Colangelo/Maurizio Gherardini combo should be kept around. Are there two more qualified guys around to make this pick?
I can't target a particular guy outside of Williams and Irving but the needs are obvious - of course at this point I still feel like the Raps just need to take the best player available.
Oh, and I have absolutely no idea what to think in terms of where the team will actually end up picking.
Sean: Hopefully the Raptors won't suffer the same draft lottery fate that the Boston Celtics had in 2007, when they were favoured to land one of the top three spots in the draft, but ended up with the fifth overall selection. If the Raptors land the draft's first or second pick then the selection process should be simple. Duke's Kyrie Irving or Arizona's Derrick William are without a doubt the two best players in this year's draft class and either one of these players would immediately be inserted into the Dinos' starting line-up. With that being said, I think Irving would be a better fit for the Raptors seeing as how their backcourt is significantly weaker than their frontcourt. Irving is an unselfish and mature young point guard who excels in transition and has the potential to be one of the league's top point guards in the coming years. However, if the Raptors do not land the second or even third pick in the draft then the team will be forced to go into a panic mode. While the draft is loaded with a number of talented players, there are no other elite prospects outside of Williams and Irving. The Dinos could take either Enes Kanter or Jan Vesely to help with their frontcourt, but Kanter and Vesely are still very raw and won't make an immediate impact. If the Raptors are forced to make a selection outside of the top two spots (which I think will be the case as they'll land the number two pick), Colangelo should just take the best player available because even if that player needs two or three seasons of grooming the sad reality is that the Raptors are at least four or five years away from making the playoffs.
D-Stance: This draft is shaping up to be a two-horse race between Kyrie Irving of Duke and Derrick Williams of Arizona. I think Irving addresses the greatest needs of this team for a variety of reasons. In the short term, he allows a declining Jose Calderon to move to the bench, where he is more productive and less likely to be exposed by opposing starters. In the long term, Irving should provide a decade of All-Star level point guard play; the type of play that the Raptors have never enjoyed at the point.
If the Raptors find themselves selecting outside the top two picks, I'm afraid they'll reach for a guy like Kemba Walker (Ben Gordon 2.0) or cause a fan revolt by selecting a European big man. Now, I'm not saying someone like Donatas Motiejunas will turn out to be a bust... but fans who have spent five seasons waiting for Andrea Bargnani to live up to the expectations of the top overall pick have a right to be weary of adding another Benetton big man.
As for where they'll end up picking? I feel like another team will move up and the Raptors will be stuck drafting fourth.
Sasha: When all is said and done, I think the Raptors will end up with the second pick in this draft, huge for this draft. At this point in time I think it has been determined quite clearly that there are two potential superstars in this draft in Derrick Williams out of Arizona and Kyrie Irving out of Duke, so getting one of the two is key. Each of them bring a skill set that can be used on the Raptors as our Point Guard and Small Forward positions are weak at the moment. Of course this will all depend on the way that the ping pong balls bounce but with the draft lottery, anything truly is possible. If we get into the 2nd spot our decision becomes very easy, we just pick which one of the two potential "stars" the team ahead of us passed on. If we get into the 1st spot our decision becomes very tough and I expect our scouting department to already be making preparations for such a scenario should it arise. I would personally opt for Williams instead of Irving if we were picking 1st. He has an NBA body and should be ready to contribute immediately. Irving looks to be a solid prospect but I am not confident in his ability to truly become an All Star calibre Point Guard, alongside the likes of Williams, Rose, Paul, Rondo, Westbrook. Williams should be ready to be plugged into the starting lineup right away and his tantalizing combination of skill and size would make him a matchup nightmare against other 3's. If we are not drafting in the top 2 than I truly don't know what our best move would be. Again, I expect our scouting department to be preparing for this scenario and I cannot think of an exact player that we would target. I am a firm believer in taking the best player available and hopefully the Raptors will do the same.
6. I think Toronto lands the third pick so the ultimate football in the groin, to use a Simpson's analogy. Regardless, the team looks like it has a ways to go before getting back into a contending position.
That brings me to my last question, a three-parter, where I'm really getting you to take out your Miss Cleo crystal ball.
A) Do we see wholesale changes this off-season again in terms of the roster?
B) Assuming there's a season next year, do the Raptors make the playoffs?
C) If not, how long do you foresee this rebuild going on for before the Dinos' next post-season appearance?
D-Stance: Rebuilding might seem like a four-letter word to a two-time executive of the year like Bryan Colangelo. However, I think he's come to the realization that a proper rebuilding effort is necessary if the Raptors hope to enjoy any kind of sustained success. So we shouldn't see the type of wholesale changes that have characterized previous off-seasons.
The Eastern Conference is so weak, I don't think you can rule out any team from making the playoffs next season. The Raptors, in particular, could see a double digit jump in wins based on a handful of moves: drafting Kyrie Irving first overall; upgrading the overall talent level; and continuing to see improvement from youngsters like Ed Davis and Amir Johnson.
Now, do I actually see this happening? Not really. The Raptors only possess a 15.6% chance of selecting first overall, and will probably walk away from the draft with a decent, but not franchise-altering player. Colangelo might stubbornly hang onto Bargnani for another season despite what he indicated in his post-season presser. And any improvements made by Davis and Johnson could be negated by a continued lack of leadership and upper echelon talent.
This rebuild is going to require at least one more trip to the lottery in 2012 and a major trade involving Bargnani. It would be nice if the Raptors could supplement their rebuild with a couple of late first round / early second round gems - but instead they've already cast their lot with James Johnson (who has at least proven to be an average performer).
Sean: I just cannot see the Raptors making any roster moves this off-season that will immediately turn them into a more competitive team. The fact of the matter is that it's hard to actually call Toronto a "rebuilding" team because the organization lacks clear direction at present. Is Andrea Bargnani still their franchise player? Who is going to buy Maple Leaf Sports and Entertainment? Are Colangelo and Triano going to be around next season? Will there even be a next season? All of these questions make it very tough to know which direction things are going to go, and the team seems to just be getting into the idea of a "rebuild" now. For that reason I think the Dinos are better off signing low-cost players that have a lot of raw potential and could be slowly groomed to play a key role on the team three or four years down the road, because whether you care to admit it or not, the Toronto Raptors have a very slim chance at making the playoffs next season. If the Raptors can land a top two pick in this year's draft, they can finally start grooming a franchise player that may be able to lead this team in the coming years. With all that being said, I think that Raptors fans will have to wait at least three or four years before they can watch their team soar into the post-season.
Howland: I wouldn't use the term "wholesale" changes but I believe there will be a lot of changes. I think the team has recognized that it needs to build around DeRozan, Davis and Amir and I don't expect any of those guys to be moved but everyone else is fair game. I think Colangelo (or whoever) has to use this summer to continue to build the foundation while finding some older veterans with a few years left to help guide the young guys as the continue their development. Standing pat just isn't an option - not when you are coming off a 22 win season. Is there need for internal development? Sure - but that isn't the only solution to this problem.
Until this off-season plays out I don't have any idea on whether the Raps even have the slightest chance at making the playoffs. Anything is possible but at this moment in time I wouldn't bet on internal development taking the team, as currently constructed, into the playoffs next season. The goal of the franchise should not simply be making the playoffs - the goal should be making regular appearances in the playoffs. I am not sure the team can fix things over the summer to such a degree that this becomes a reality. Rome was not built in a day and neither are quality teams that consistently win.
Franchise: I'll end things by saying that I too think that the playoffs are a good two or three seasons away. When you compare the Dinos to the various playoff clubs there's still a massive gap in terms of the necessary talent level needed, and to Sean's point, some major questions in terms of the club's direction and ownership probably need to be answered before anyone can talk post-season.
In any event, the HQ will be around to put this rebuild process under our usual microscope and I'd like to thank the team for another great season of discussion and analysis.
Hopefully, the threat of a work stoppage is just that, a threat, so we can do this all over again come next fall.
104 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Comparing Top 20 in 2010-11 WP/48 vs WS/48 - 700 Or More MP
I looked at the top 20 in Wins Produced per 48 MP vs the top 20 in Win Shares per 48 MP. Set the minutes played bar at 700 minutes or more so Reggie would be included.
There were twelve players in both lists
Here are the twelve in both lists sorted alphabetically
Ct Name
-————————————
1 Bynum
2 C. Anderson
3 Chandler
4 Gasol
5 Howard
6 James
7 KG
8 Love
9 Noah
10 Paul
11 Randolph
12 Wade
Here are the eight in the top 20 in Wins Produced per 48 minutes that are not in the top 20 in Win Shares per 48 minutes, sorted alphabetically.
1 Camby
2 Duncan
3 Evans
4 Fields
5 Foster
6 Humprhies
7 Nash
8 Rondo
Here are the eight in the top 20 in Wins Shares per 48 minutes that are not in the top 20 in Wins Produced per 48 minutes, sorted alphabetically.
1 Ginobili
2 KD
3 Nene
4 Nowiitzki
5 Odom
6 Pierce
7 R. Anderson
8 Rose
So according to the Wins Produced Forumula their eight are more valuable on a per minute played basis than the eight in the Win Share group.
Tell you what I will take the eight in the Win Shares group and play the eight in Wins Produced group any place any time in a seven game series.
I will start
Nene
Pierce
Nowitzki
KD
Rose
Bench
-————
Odom
R. Anderson
Ginobilli
The Wins Produced people can start
Evans
Duncan
Fields
Nash
Rondo
Bench
-——————
Camby
Humphries
Foster
Wins Produced debunked
Yep. Because the impact a player has on their team is an isolated thing, with no external factors. Plus, it’s fun to just disregard positions.
WP does not tell you who the better player is. Nor does WS. They are not intended for that purpose. WP and WS are both measures of how much a player contributed to their team that year. This is very dependent on teammates, system, coaching, etc. As such, it is somewhat foolhardy to compare players on different teams, and especially at different positions using either of these measures. I used it to determine the most productive player on the team because that is within the scope of the statistic – you are misusing it.
by dhackett1565 on May 4, 2011 11:11 AM EDT up reply actions
Another Meaningless Straw Man Set Up
You should finish all of your posts with
IMO
As should we all.
i.e:
Wins Produced debunked IMO
by dhackett1565 on May 4, 2011 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
And again you simply yell ‘strawman!’ and don’t do anything to disprove my apparently empty points. Calling my argument a strawman is as empty a statement as my purported strawman argument would be.
by dhackett1565 on May 4, 2011 12:38 PM EDT up reply actions
Also, I’m starting to wonder if you know what a strawman argument is.
by dhackett1565 on May 4, 2011 12:48 PM EDT up reply actions
I Disproved Your Argument In My Post Period
No point in commenting further.
You will argue the point no matter what facts and proof I bring.
How did you disprove my argument? Here, I’ll disprove yours in a similar manner:
Ryan Anderson scores a higher WS/48 than Dirk Nowitzki, therefore he is a better player according to WS. This is clearly nonsense, so WS is debunked.
This is effectively what you did, in smaller scope. Do you see what a ridiculous argument you put forward?
If you were to present me with a study showing that WS correlates with team wins better than WP, I certainly wouldn’t argue that point. Which of course is what I was asking for, since WP was developed as a tool specifically to correlate with team wins, which is what makes it so valuable.
But what ever do you mean? ; )
I never said anyone specific, what are you insinuating?
Your ridiculous hate for Solomon Alabi must stop MAS! He just never got a chance to get a high WS or WP!
Stop hating on Solomon
Just had a good chat with Assistant Coach Eric Hughes which we’ll be posting Monday hopefully…he’s still a big Alabi fan ;)
Also:
WP and WS are both measures of how much a player contributed to their team that year.
Completely agree with dhackett here. The advanced stats stuff is part of the puzzle but not sure you can take it in a vacuum to make decisions.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
Sacrilege!!!
“The advanced stats stuff is part of the puzzle but not sure you can take it in a vacuum to make decisions.”
Don’t say that too loud, D-Stance might be listening! ;)
I know you are playing around
but I don’t think d-stance has ever said they should/can be used in a vaccuum or that they are all that matter when judging a player….
by Not so Friendly Stranger on May 4, 2011 3:04 PM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, I don’t advocate using advanced stats in a vacuum. But they can certainly be used to back up anecdotal evidence. I’m pretty confident saying I wouldn’t need advanced stats to come to the conclusion that Bargs sucks – it just helps to have numbers to back up the obvious.
Geoff Rahal
Author, RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2011 3:16 PM EDT up reply actions
How about this for advanced stats
The Raps won 22 games this year with a certain player taking the most shots and playing the most minutes, and for the most part, looked like he was playing in a vacuum
Nah, you can’t mouth-breathe in a vacuum.
by dhackett1565 on May 5, 2011 11:01 AM EDT up reply actions
Bottom 20 Wins Produced and Win Shares 1,500 or More Minutes
I increased the minutes to 1,500 or more which is more representative of what a regular rotation player would play in a season, starters or bench rotation players
There were eight overlaps listed alphabetically
1 B Gordon
2 Beasley
3 Foye
4 Milicic
5 Outlaw
6 R. Bell
7 W. Green
8 W.Johnson
12 worst in in Wins Produced per 48 minutes but not in 12 worst Win Shares 1,500 or more minutes played, list alphabetically
1 B. Lopez
2 Bargnani
3 DeRozan
4 Fisher
5 G. Davis
6 Gomes
7 Harrington
8 J. Crawford
9 J. Green
10 N. Young
11 S. Brown
12 Villanueva
12 worst in in Win Shares per 48 minutes but not in 12 worst Wins Produced 1,500 or more minutes played, list alphabetically
1 A Parker
2 Arenas
3 Bledsoe
4 C. Brewer
5 Cousins
6 Farmar
7 Hickson
8 M. Williams
9 S. Jackson
10 T. Evans
11 Wall
12 Watson
One could argue these non-overlapping lists till the cows come home. So I will not go there.
For Wins Produced Link go to my previous post with that link
P.S.
Bargnani was 21st worst in the Win Shares list,.
Thanks Buddahfan!!
I guess I was wrong about Alabi ; )
This decisively settles the WP vs WS debate. Clearly, WP48 is a superior measurement tool since it rates Bargnani lower than WS does. ;)
Actually The Universe of Players Was A Lot Less Than 450
In looking at the worst list I only took players who played 1,500 minutes minimum last season
There were 199 in the list.
So Bargnani was 178th out of 199 in WS/48 among players who played at least 1,500 minutes last season.
When you look at BasketballValue.com “1 Year Unadjusted Overall Rating” Bargnani’s rating was a minus 3.35 however it was better than
Bayless -4.48
Evans -4.80
Davis -5.20
Weems -7.54
However, he was sixth worst in “1 Year Unadjusted Defensive Rating” among the 231 players in the league who played at least 1,185 minutes which is BasketballValue.com cut off for player rankings
And then there’s this from wagesofwins.com, that has Bargnani as a -7 Wins and dead last in the league: http://www.wagesofwins.com/AllPlayersRank2010-11.html
To further emphasise the point, players ranked 309 to 452 (second last) range from 0 to -3.4 wins produced, then from second last to last (Bargnani) it drops off a cliff and more than DOUBLES to a mind blowing -7! It’s incredible!
Of the top two picks in this years draft, I think I would go with Irving. Point guards kind of rule the league right now and Irving would have one or two decent mentors in Jose and Leandro and or some healthy competition for top spot from Jerryd.
I hope the Raptors are no where near the playoffs next year as I too believe we will need one more decent draft pick (after this year) to gather enough talent to truly start seeing some success.
Let me ask the HQ a question. Should there be a work stoppage, would the HQ go on hiatus?
"I hope the Raptors are no where near the playoffs next year as I too believe we will need one more decent draft pick (after this year) to gather enough talent to truly start seeing some success."
Totally agree. That’s why I hope the Raptors do little this offseason other than draft their pick, trade Bargnani for "future considerations" (i.e. expiring contract(s) and/or whatever combination of young talent and draft picks are available) and take a few fliers on other young unproven talent (like they did with Doresey for example) to fill out the roster. That way, the young "core" of DeRozan, Davis, Johnson and even Johnson can play leadership roles can get unlimited experience and play leadership roles while positioning well for 2012 draft that looks to be stacked by all accounts.
The worst thing that could happen is if Brian Colangelo is allowed/enabled by MLSE to "Brian Colangelo" the offseason. In case you’re not familiar, to "Brian Colangelo" the offseason means to go out and substantially overpay for borderline NBA players with an objective of making the playoffs only to later realize that the talent you signed isn’t as good as you thought it was and you’ve wasted valuable cap space.
Seems to me, if BC can take another year of losing, the best bet is to hold onto Bargs. Let him drag the team down to another awesome pick, and ship him off next off season when his contract is one year shorter and shinier.
Oh, and criticism works better in combination with correct spelling. BC won’t know you are talking about him if you don’t get his name right.
I’d rather get an expiring payer of equal value or some sort of play to the future (i.e. draft pick, young player)… Shudder at the thought of watching Bargnani again.
Oh and I don’t give a shat how to spell his name. Thanks,
If the Raptors want a top pick in next year’s draft then keeping Bargnani and his -6 Wins Produced(or whatever the exact figure is) would seem like the ideal way to accomplish that goal.
Presumably, they want more out of the season than that, such as establishing a defensive identity. For that they will need to ship Bargs out of town.
On the plus side, since their seem to be quite a few good-looking prospects in next year’s draft it might not be imperative to be absolute last in order to get a great talent infusion. So if the Raptors improved to the 30-35 win range next year they might still be able to draft a pretty good player in the #8 spot(or whatever they would get with that win total).
Nope.
We’ll be commenting on the NBA 2k12/NBA Live 12 seasons :p
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on May 4, 2011 1:43 PM EDT up reply actions
"Point guards kind of rule the league right now"
I’m not sure this is true.
There are alot of good pgs out there… but do any of them compare to Kobe, Lebron, Wade and Dwight? Or others in recent history, KG, Duncan, Shaq?
PGs are “hot” right now…. but give me a superstar big and/or wing any day of the week. Teams can easily get by with just a smart PG.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on May 4, 2011 3:08 PM EDT up reply actions
I don't know
With current rules in place damn near allowing PGs to travel to the basket at will, I would say there has never been a better time to be a point guard.
to elaborate...
Point guards are being asked to carry a lot more of the scoring load these days. I mean, how hard is it to keep an offensive minded point guard from driving to the hoop lately. It’s not like these guys are getting any bigger. If anything, I’d bet the average height of a point guard has gone down (can’t substantiate that, no time to look it up, at work).
I don't disagree exactly
but I think the players who lead their teams now, and have lead their teams over the past few decades, show otherwise. That is, yes there is a lot more scoring PGs, but they aren’t necessarily leading their teams to success than other positions. And while yes there are alot more penetration from the perimeter (I think you can apply this to pg, sg and sf), that inturn has emphasized the importance of a dominant big.
I will say I think a player can be great at any position, and a team can be great with a superstar/players at any position (don’t want to limit things here). But of the 8 teams left in the playoffs, only 1 is built around a PG (I’d say a fair argument could be made for Westbrook and OKC though) And if you look at the teams PGs we see a list of:
Fischer
Kidd
Westbrook
Conley
Rondo
Bibby
Hinrich
Rose
Definetely some great ones in there no doubt, but of that list only 2 are scorers and 3 are penetrators. I think its fair to say Fischer, Kidd, Hinrich and Bibby don’t do either of those things well if at all (atleast anymore)… and Conley is an “all purpose” sort of guy.
Even then when you look within those teams their top player(s) are:
Kobe/Gasol/(Bynum/Odom)
Durant/Westbrook
Nowitski
Randolph/Gay(well until he was injured)
Garnett/Peirce/Allen/Rondo
James/Wade – one thing here… I think you could fairly call LBJ a PG, but you could also fairly call him a sg or sf aswell. He is just so diverse as a player its tough to limit him to one position… wade aswell.
Johnson/Horford/(Smith)
Rose
Basically what I’m saying is yes there are definetely very good PGs out there. Yes you can have success with a very good PG. But the teams that are (and did historically) have success, usually had starts at the big position (usually C), and/or the wing position (usually SG). PGs have become very exciting to watch. Are more capable of being able to pentrate and force the defense to collapse. But that can come from the wings position to. And its still so rare to have a dominant big man, that when you do it leads to success (match up problems). It more or less looks like a PG league Rose, Westbrook, Nash, Paul, Deron, Rondo, Jennings etc. are getting so much attention because of the excitment they create. But the contenders are using big men and sg still. What they do have though, is smart PGs… that is, ones that know their role. That are more than willing to pass or take a shot when necessary. To play without the ball in their hands. And most importantly, are one of the veterans (experienced) and leaders on their team. If they can score aswell, fantastic…
by Not so Friendly Stranger on May 5, 2011 10:06 AM EDT up reply actions
It's cool, I admit I may have been over stating it a bit.
I get what you are saying. Truth be told, if there was a defensive minded center being mentioned in the same class as Irving and Williams, I would be leaning towards drafting him. I guess a great example of what you are saying would be Boston after the Perkins trade. They would probably be able to put up a better fight against Miami if Kendrick were still on the team. Right now, they look like they would be lucky to win a game in this series.
It’s funny. My favorite player of all time is Magic Johnson. One of my least favorite current players is Lebron James. Yet, Lebron is kind of a more aggressive version of Magic. Despite his obvious talent, I just can not bring myself to cheer for him. Having said that, you are correct, his positional versatility is rediculous.
completely agree
1) magic vs lebron is confidence vs arrogance. I think thats the difference…. maybe a fine line between them, but a huge gap when you see it.
2) Defensive big… which is something I was actually thinking after I wrote the novel. When I said dominant big, its was more than just offense, but defense. Ben Wallace for example is someone I would have called a dominant big, but we all know it wasn’t for his scoring. Shaq/Duncan/Howard… the scoring was great, but its their defense that has really made their teams great.
Chandler, Perkins/Ibaka, Marc Gasol, Bynum/Odom, Noah, Horford/Smith, Joel Anthony, KG (and the change with losing Perkins)…. I want to mention a name to compare these guys but I don’t think its fair to ‘Alabi’…..
by Not so Friendly Stranger on May 5, 2011 11:06 AM EDT up reply actions
Right, not fair to “Alabi”.
Though, judging by yesterday’s poll, “Alabi” still has his share of supporters among the HQ faithful.
Having barely seen Alabi on the court, I don’t have much of an opinion about him. However, when he was drafted he was always thought of as a long term project. Has that changed? If not, why are we rushing to any kind of judgment about him at this point?
Sorry DW19, I think this stemmed off a joke I made when someone made a criticism of Bargs yesterday by statint that an unnamed 7 footer from our team was near the bottom of both the WS and WP lists – and I jokingly implied that they should leave Alabi alone. I take full responsibility for all future misuse of Alabi’s name. I fear I may have ruined the young man’s career.
Ah! I see....
I’m behind the times on this one. These comments make more sense if “Alabi” does not mean Alabi.
I Still Would Like To See Bayless Be Given An Extended Shot At Starting PG
He definitely has shown that he can create and score, even in bunches.
His assist to turnover ratio improved quite significant this last season. Though it will probably never be at Jose’s level, Bayless did get his Assist to Turnover ratio over 2.0 for the first time at 2.2 which isn’t all that bad.
He made almost 35% of his threes and I think he can do even better in the future.
He will still be only 23 next season so I think if gets the opportunity to start and play the minutes he could become a very good PG on offense.
He is a smart kid and I think if you put some bigs behind him who can team defend that as he gets more experience he could become a decent defender or better.
I think that he has more upside than James Johnson so that is why I would rather see BC draft Williams rather than Irving if he has a shot at both.
kemba walker
If we don’t get irving or williams I wouldn’t mind going for kemba walker. Tim did an article on tsn giving very good points on why the raps should go for walker in the draft. Look at what he did in the tournment with not much help from his teammates, has great leadership and a competitive nature about hiimself that a lead guard should have. He can score anywhere on the court and if you look at ast’s he averaged more than all the other pg’s including irving that are in the draft. So for me if we don’t land in the top 2 than I sure as hell wouldn’t mind us picking walker.
by sherwin316 on May 4, 2011 11:41 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
Some of Walkers Stats
Walker’s Stats Last Two Seasons at Conn.
2 Pt FG %
-———————-
2009-10 .403
2010-11 .428
3 Pt FG%
-—————————
2009-10 .339
2010-11 .330
Will Bynums Stats Last Two Season with Pistons
2 Pt FG %
-———————-
2009-10 .444
2010-11 .448
3 Pt FG%
-—————————
2009-10 .218
2010-11 .320
Walker is a slightly upgraded version of Will Bynum
Will Bynum?! Man, I’m at least giving Kemba a Ben Gordon 2.0 label. The Bynum compare is just harsh. LOL
Geoff Rahal
Author, RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2011 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I think I could live with Ben Gordon 2.0 with the third or fourth pick. Though, I’d prefer a defensive minded center.
Ben Gordon with the 3rd or 4th pick means its been a terrible draft year....
Ben Gordon was the captain of the empty calorie all-stars (players that contribute nothing else but scoring and score inefficiently) until he was replaced this season by a new captain (who shall remain unnamed).
I don’t really think there’s too many of those defensive minded centers in this draft tho. Maybe we’ll have to look to free agency for that but as for the draft I don’t see it. Most of the bigs in this draft are hugh question marks.
by sherwin316 on May 4, 2011 1:18 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
I’d prefer the Raps trade down I think if they don’t get one of those top two spots. We’re going to start shifting back to the draft focus though tomorrow to start looking at the options Toronto has.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
Agreed – do you think we could fetch, say, Cleveland’s second pick and their 2012 pick? Picks 3-8 or so seem pretty even.
If 3-8 are pretty even then the value obtained by trading down would be pretty minimal unless some team was clearly targeting a guy in the #3 spot. Unless Cleveland really loved Valanciunas/Walker/whoever, I don’t see them giving up their 2012 pick to move up. At best they might offer a second rounder.
I Would Like To See The Raptors Sign
Oden if he checks out medically
Chandler
or
D. Jordan
What are the league rules on signing long term deals?
For example can the Raps sign Derozen and Davis to long term deals at any time or are there signing regulations?
There are significant regulations. They must stay on their rookie contracts until the final team option year. During that summer, they can be extended for up to 5 years. But only up until the start of the season – then they cannot be extended (Julian Wright was in this situation this year – he is now a restricted free agent, pending a qualifying offer this summer).
Unfortunately, neither DeRozan nor Davis are eligible for this sort of extension yet, and who knows what the rules will be after the CBA negotiations.
by dhackett1565 on May 4, 2011 12:43 PM EDT up reply actions
Draft with a Draft
I can’t target a particular guy outside of Williams and Irving but the needs are obvious – of course at this point I still feel like the Raps just need to take the best player available. [Howland]
You made some great points, but this above comment I’ve heard from a number of posters. Which leads me to a question. If we can’t define a pick after the top 2, then how can we simply choose the next best player. Or more exactly, why wouldn’t we choose a player that meets our needs – which are many.
Unless there’s a clear cut PF out there, who we can’t pass up, why would we choose a PF. We’re overloaded at the spot, and personally, there’s seems to be a lot of them around the league – so packaging one (in a multi-trade) doesn’t strike me as a fruitful endeavour.
.
What I think we should concentrate on, is a PG or SF (to a degree), with a Free Agent signing / trade, bringing us that ever rare defensive Centre (who can stand on his feet without a look of pain on his face).
.
I’ll end things by saying that I too think that the playoffs are a good two or three seasons away. [Franchise]
I’ll be disappointed if we don’t make the play-offs this upcoming season (should it happen). Assuming we only make a few changes (draft + F/A signing), and neither involve a PG, I would hope to see improvement from Bayless. To go along with a bigger Davis, a next-step Demar, JJ making that Miami pick an absolute steal, a healthy Amir (with a trade value that is probably at its’ prime), and a Bargnani being used properly (ie. not coddled & not defined as the Franchise player).
Add a healthy Barbosa plus a Jose without hamstring issues, and missing the play-offs would – IMO – define regression. Part of how I base this on, is my belief that injuries affected the Raptors by a lot more than 6 – 8 games.
.
As for drafting Europeans (if they’re the next best thing after Irving & Williams), can the real or perceived cliques within the Raptors co-exist with each other. Whether I’m imagining this or not, would another European create more of a divide within the ranks – that seems to have persisted over the years.
.
This perception is why I believe Raptors top need on this team is a true Leader (and I see few prospects on this team). A veteran presence that would resolve this over the course of the season, and give direction to our youth.
.
As for drafting Europeans (if they’re the next best thing after Irving & Williams), can the real or perceived cliques within the Raptors co-exist with each other. Whether I’m imagining this or not, would another European create more of a divide within the ranks – that seems to have persisted over the years.
I’m glad you went there. But I’m not sure you’d get a straight answer out of anyone in the Raptors’ organization on that one.
Geoff Rahal
Author, RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2011 3:25 PM EDT up reply actions
America vs Europe
Sounds like a South Park episode in the making.
This perceived divide doesn’t get enough attention (here and everywhere – especially with the team). To me, this issue goes to a lack of Leadership that the Raptors have experienced for far too long. If the final game interviews were jabs at Andrea or whoever (and it really doesn’t matter who or why), a real Leader would’ve shaken these guys for being so petulant. No way a Kobe would’ve put up with that shit.
.
by RapthoseLeafs on May 4, 2011 3:45 PM EDT up reply actions
It’s true – I’m sure Amir Johnson does a great job of providing leadership to some of the Young Gunz. But they need the type of leadership that extends across the entire roster.
Geoff Rahal
Author, RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2011 3:54 PM EDT up reply actions
Amir Will Be In His Seventh Season in the NBA Next Season
On the current roster only Evans and Barbosa have more years in the league and they might not be back next season.
So even if the Raptors sign some veteran with 10 years experience Amir will still have more years in the league than most of the roster.
Now if you are talking minutes on the court that is a different story.
On top of that he will be one of the taller players on the team next season and people have a natural tendency to look up to taller people for leadership. LOL
…..Or you could argue a real leader would have kicked Andrea’s butt a long time ago for not trying harder.
1) I think the Euro-America thing is overblown. The Raptors American contingent seemed to get along great with Garbajosa and Nesterovic when they were here and I have never heard of anyone having a problem with Calderon (even Ford and Jack got along with him they just wanted his starting spot)
2) Bargnani and Turk stand out not for being European, but because they were not good team players. If they were American they would still engender ill will amongst their teammates.
3) Anthony Parker was a valuable cultural bridge when he was here.
Jenge thinks that (Anger + Statistics = Proof) demands respect for the Anger/Frustration issues to be sorted out. Otherwise all we are 'prooving' is something different entirely...
…such as ..
…“the Raptors faithful are tearing each other apart following a 22 win season with a paltry draft as the main consolation. The fan base is splintering across continental divides, racial and national factions, with statistical analysis leading to even more acrimony. Frustrations run high as each faction ‘goes all-in’ for a headbutting match – with very little in the way of certainty about any outcomes or conclusions…let alone the future composition of the team and its management… Not only is the team on trial, so are some of the laws of metaphysics and logic”
However:
“It seems that a weak consesnus seems to be pointing to the problems that Andrea Bargnani (as a NBA centre) is concsiously not interested in fullfilling the basic expectations which would see him contribute meaningfully to the team’s defensive woes and the assigned task of grabbing rebounds. These two factors, coupled with Bargnani’s relaxed demeanour are said to be developing a feeling amongst the team (and fanbase) that Bargnani’s performance is nowhere near a level that could be considered ‘satisfactory’.”
'....as a child, I dreamt of being a baseball.'
Interesting thoughts Jenge
I do believe Raptors are a fractured group, as is our fan base — with it’s bi-polar tendencies ……..
We love Bosh .. we hate Bosh. We love Vinny … we hate Vinny. It’s like picking the petals from a daisy.
"It seems that a weak consesnus seems to be pointing to the problems that Andrea Bargnani (as a NBA centre) is concsiously not interested in fullfilling the basic expectations which would see him contribute meaningfully to the team’s defensive woes and the assigned task of grabbing rebounds. These two factors, coupled with Bargnani’s relaxed demeanour are said to be developing a feeling amongst the team (and fanbase) that Bargnani’s performance is nowhere near a level that could be considered ‘satisfactory’."
To some of your points in the above comment:
- “consciously not interested in fulfilling the basic expectations …” – I think the expectations for him were not basic by any stretch of the means. D-Stance best illustrates with his statement:
… fans who have spent five seasons waiting for Andrea Bargnani to live up to the expectations of the top overall pick have a right to be weary of adding another Benetton big man.
- “… relaxed demeanor " – I think if one looks back at his 2nd & 3rd years, Andrea was nowhere near relaxed. His confidence level (as was debated back then), hit a low. Whether that was a function of “high expectations”, or Mitch, or positioning, will always generate a debate. Suffice to say, I don’t think he has a relaxed attitude now – which is a good thing. This is why I believe we need to try one more year of Andrea – don’t kill me on this D-Stance. The upside is … no more coddling. The downside … well, it’s actually an upside — we get a top pick again, but in a good draft.
- Coaching Andrea – The more I think about it, the more I wonder how AB’s path could’ve been better with Jay as his first coach, and Mitch as the current coach. The former develops fundamentals & confidence, while the latter develops an attitude and accountability. Someone who’s more inclined to demand commitment & hustle, with the consequences defining his playing time.
Call it coddling too much (this past season) or whatever, but a different coach would’ve been more demanding. And I just don’t believe BC set ground rules with Jay on this. More that JT was hamstrung by the lack of a true defensive Centre. And putting Amir or Ed in that role (in a more extensive way), had potential risks to weigh.
.
"I think the expectations for him were not basic by any stretch of the means"
I think being one of the worst players in the entire league production wise can be categorized as not meeting basic expectations!
"Coaching Andrea"
LOL I love it! That was very entertaining. Let’s try this, let’s keep bringing in different caoches for the next ten years until Bargnani retires. Because it ain’t going to change jack who’s coaching Bargnani, you can’t squeeze blood from a stone.
'Basic' Expectations': a play by charles dickens?
This is the story of a young Italian boy lured by greedy northerns to bounce a ball for their enjoyment of ‘spreading the floor’. The young man faced great challenges in his ordeals amongst the rat faced population who were known to gnaw on any little morsel of discontent, as the town had become a place of funery worship of the death of trees in the autmn. Known for their penchant for ‘sport’ that ushered in the chilly seasons where the northerns minions would wait for ice crystals to form – how would this young man endure, and win the hearts of the world?
'....as a child, I dreamt of being a baseball.'
its a joke.
Great Expectations is a book by Charles Dickens….
'....as a child, I dreamt of being a baseball.'
Andrea for 6th Man of the Year
He’d be a very expensive 6th man, but I think he would bring great value there, and probably up his trade value. Just compare Bargs stats and scoring ability to that of Jamal Crawford. Both can come off the bench and score in bunches immediately, both are ball hogs, and both play crappy defense. Yet ATL is making it work with Crawford. I know everyone here likes to crap on PPG but I disagree. What you want in a 6th man is someone who can come in and take the scoring load off of your starters. You’re not going to get that from Amir Johnson, not close, not ever. When the Hawks starters are struggling to score, in comes Crawford off the bench, just dominating the ball, but he has this uncanny ability to put up a ton of points in a short period of time and it swings the momentum of the game back in the Hawks favor. The Raptors would be wise to use Andrea in the same way. Since you’re not bringing in Bargs for his defense, you could bring him off the bench at SF, PF, or C, depending on where the weakest matchup is. Bargs offense is more or less a SF offense, and I don’t think it matters if he’s getting scorched by a C or SF on defense, he’s going to get scorched no matter what. Just like Crawford gets abused on defense whether he is guarding the opposing PG or SG.
But if they don’t go this route, I think that one intriguing trade partner is Denver. Felton wants out of Denver, he fits a huge need for the Raptors, and Denver doesn’t have much room for him behind Lawson. The money works out that you could do the trade straight up. Denver has a huge need for a PF/C going forward, so you could probably get them to throw in some draft picks too. If Felton doesn’t work out, his deal is expiring and would open up cap space or be an even more valuable trade chip than Bargs. The only way this trade doesn’t make sense is if the Raps get Irving.
One last thing. I think everyone is sleeping on Enes Kanter. Everyone was looking at Sullinger as a sure thing and possible 1st overall pick. Kanter absolutely dominated Sullinger in the 2010 Nike Hoops Summit putting up 34pts and 13rbs. And it wasn’t just against Sullinger, it was against almost all of the best college basketball players from this past year. If he had gotten to play for Kentucky this year I’m sure we’d be talking about him as a possible 1st overall pick, and Kentucky would likely have been the national champs. Since he was ruled inelligible he has been practicing with Kentucky all year long and the players comments from that team indicate that Kanter dominates in practice too. If we don’t get Irving or Williams then I think you have to go with Kanter, and I think we’ll be pleasantly surprised with a long term borderline all star center.
If the Raptors end up with 3-5 range pick then I would all in favour of giving Kanter a good look. I would want to know that he checks out medically because there has been some talk about his knees. If they are fine then he would give the Raptors a big body who actually plays big. I also like Valanciunas for the same reason. He looks a little lightweight right now, but his style of play (shot blocking, fighting for boards) is what the Raptors need in their front court. Valanciunas has never had an health issues(from what little I know about him), which is also a plus. If the Raptors scouts think they can carry their style of play over to the NBA then they would be good options if the Raptors don’t get one of the top 2 picks.
I am also both intrigued by and suspicious of this dude Biyombo who has been generating some buzz lately. He seems a little redundant as an athletic PF when the Raps already have Davis and Amir, but it would be good to know more about him because he might be a guy other teams would trade up for if his stock starts rising fast.
I think, if you put Andrea back on the bench, even in a 6th man role, he will regress. It has happened before. He doesn’t handle coming off the bench well. I think it would be tough for any player to go from the focal point of the offense to a role player off the bench. Solid idea, I just don’t know how possible it is.
So what's the solution?
I’m assuming your suggesting he needs to be traded?
Yeah,
I’m not a fan of trying to fit Bargs with a new role next year. I am firmly in the “Fresh Start” camp.
Enes Kanter Update
Measured 6-11, 261 lbs at the LeBron James Skills Academy in July
At That Size He Will Most Likely Be The Biggest Player In The Draft
Certainly the biggest among the lottery picks.
The kid can play.
The big question are his knees.
Worth the gamble in the top #3.
Could bring BC redemption for the Bargnani pick.
Question: Why do the Raptors seem to get a top #5 pick only in weak drafts?
Just noticed this parat of the article
“the Raptors won’t suffer the same draft lottery fate that the Boston Celtics had in 2007, when they were favoured to land one of the top three spots in the draft, but ended up with the fifth overall selection.”
… and traded that pick to get Kevin Garnett and win the NBA title.
poor old Celtics. suffer they did.
That pick (ended up being Jeff Green) was actually traded to Seattle to secure the services of one Walter Ray Allen. But your point is taken, the Celtics made out all right I suppose…
Raps need new BK kicks
I believe Brandon Knight will end up being the best NBA player, with the highest impact on his team, outside of the top two in this draft class. Going Euro-big doesn’t make this team more competitive, drafting Ben Gordon jr. doesn’t either and Biyombo reminds me more of Saer Sene than Ben Wallace or Serge Ibaka.
I think BK will emerge in the same way Rondo did, he’s got a similar game, pedigree and prime-time potential. I think he’ll become the big guard who can break down the defense, make sound plays and rebound the ball – creating space for DeRozan to be an explosive finisher, Davis to rebound and put back misses, and even put Bargnani in places he can be successful.
Thoughts?




























