"No Star Player Wants to Go to Toronto."
So we had David Andersen.
And next week we've got a Hedo Eulogy, some Q and A with Dave Berri, and some other goodies perhaps as early as tomorrow, including an interview with one of my favourite MC's at the moment; Canada's own Shad, an avid ball fan.
But for this Friday we thought we'd switch gears and get our readers take on a blurb from ESPN.com's Mike and Mike in the Morning.
In it, the two Mike's debate whether an NBA team in Toronto has a long-term future based on the exodus of stars like McGrady, Carter and now Bosh.
I don't agree with their statements in the least bit (there's a team in Minny for God's sake), but it's an interesting listen simply because it's an indictment of how many American players may feel, and who knows, perhaps the reason BC keeps going to the Euro-well time and time again:
Mike and Mike on Bosh
A big shout out to Mike Lumsden for the link on this one and in my opinion, if you build a winning product and are paying top dollar for the top stars (ala Utah and San Antonio), it doesn't really matter where your team is located. In addition, McGrady was gone one way or another, but both Bosh and Carter stuck around to sign a second contract so it wasn't exactly the Memphis Grizzlies. And had management built Championship contending teams around them, I doubt they'd be (or have gone) elsewhere.
So I don't think you can paint all of Toronto's big-name free-agents with the same paint brush there fellas.
But regardless, is the US permanently stuck on Canada being the arctic and a non-viable basketball destination?
0 recs |
79 comments
|
Comments
This was a question and answer from one of my favourite sports journalists.
I’m upset because I think Toronto is a great city (it’s extremely multi-cultural and friendly) and every time we get anyone good to play here they end up leaving. Vince Carter, T-Mac, Chris Bosh and even Mo Pete (Morris Peterson). This is just a rant, but maybe you have some input about the situation. Is there just a stigma in the States that Toronto is a bad city? Why do people never want to play here and what does the future hold for us? — Matt Negreanu, Toronto
Having been there dozens of times, I agree that Toronto is a wonderful place. In addition to the attributes you highlight, Toronto is clean, peaceful, easy to traverse and filled with wonderful stores, restaurants and parks, beautiful lakeside scenery and recreational areas, a wide variety of cultural events and even fascinating architecture.
However, for too many cosmopolitan Americans, Toronto is erroneously deemed to be little more than a glorified hick town. Some ultra-patriots may still be hostile to Toronto because it provided refuge for draft resisters during the Vietnam conflict.
But losing Carter, T-Mac, Bosh and Mo Pete was nothing to cry about. The problem was the Raptors’ brass believing that those guys were the real deal and could make the team authentic contenders. If the roster were stocked with players who know how (and want) to win, Toronto would be more attractive to the type of performers who would have a more positive impact on the franchise’s fortunes.
Poll on the website:
All else being equal, in which city would you prefer to play?
Cleveland 12% Oklahoma City 32% Toronto 56%
Weather analysis
One problem with Carter, T-Mac and Bosh is that they all grew up in the US south. Of course winter seemed cold to them. MoPete(from Michigan) never complained about winter. KG(from Chicago) never complained about winters in Minny, he just wanted out because the team could never win.
Surprisingly, DeRozan(LA) and Weems(Arkansas) never made a peep about Toronto’s arctic conditions last year, as far as I remember. Bargnani(Italy), Johnson(LA, though he played in Detroit) and many others also seem to be able to suck it up.
If the Raptors somehow manage to grab Harrison Barnes is next year’s draft then he should be fine in TO. Being from Ames, Iowa I am sure that TO may seem a little foreign, but at least he should have not trouble handling the winter.
I’ve heard DeMar mention the cold, but I’ve also heard him this summer mention how hot it was, so goes both ways with him I think.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Franchise on Jul 30, 2010 12:49 PM EDT up reply actions
How did Mo Pete get on this list?
Didn’t Mo want to stay in T.O. – but the Raps didn’t offer him a contract?
Mo Pete No Mo
.
I thought the same thing.
.
by RapthoseLeafs on Jul 30, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Let us be clear about something first. Mo Pete left because Toronto didn’t want to pay his ridiculous salary demands not because he bolted to the US at the first chance he got. Yes Carter, TMac and Bosh all bailed but all for different reasons which were not so much about playing for Toronto but each for their own reasons which were only partially related to playing in Canada.
Check this out
When Canadians like Nash (Suns) do not want to play in Canada, you know you’ve got a problem.
Food for Thought
In the last 30 years there have been 21 new teams added to the 4 major sports leagues, of those 21 teams only 5 have won championships. The Florida Marlins have 2, Arizona Diamondbacks have 1, the Tampa Bay Lightening have 1 and the Miami Heat have 1. If Dwayne Wade did not lead that spectacular comeback no expansion team in NBA history would have won a championship.
Very interesting. That probably deserves some deeper analysis. For instance, is that because “new” teams have a tough time attracting and retaining new players, since history and a winning culture aren’t on their side?
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Franchise on Jul 30, 2010 12:50 PM EDT up reply actions
Lack of stability and lack of winning culture. Right now does BC seem to be trying to build a team, or put together a team that will not get him fired. When coaches, general managers and presidents have the support of their ownership they tend to sacrifice long term flexibility for short term solutions which handcuffs teams.
Look at the major teams in sports (Celtics, Patriots, Lakers, Yankees, Red Sox, Packers) the ownership supports the coaches and administrative staff and they feel comfortable to take their time and make the right move for the future for the team instead of the best move at the moment. You cannot buy chemistry but you can buy talent, its important to build chemistry first and then add talent. Can we really say in BC times here that this team has developed? I think not because we have had a new team every year! Look at OKC they got young players took their lumps and now they have a bright bright future.
I have to say that if the statement “No Star Wants to Go to Toronto” was true it speaks mostly to the immaturity, ignorance or self-absorption of many NBA stars. Bosh and Carter were both happy to play in Toronto, while the team was winning. If all a player cares about is being on ESPN and getting invited to premieres of movies, then is that really the guy you want to build your team around? (cheapshot, I realize)
All teams have to go through this soul searching bad publicity period at some point. A couple of years ago, I remember reading that no player wanted to go to New York(because the team sucked and was capped out). Really?
Having recently visited the Bay Area, I can say that San Francisco is a helluva city, but if you think back over the years there have been players that refused to go there or forced their way out. The Warriors were recently sold for 400M+ and aren’t likely to go anywhere anytime soon.
This latest piece from M&M is just more hot air added to the massive amounts that comes out during the offseason. Why right now their is a sidebar on Raps HQ advertising a totally absurd article called “Why Greed is Good…” What a load of horse manure that article turned out to be. I read it thinking that the author might offer some novel point of view on the Miami situation, but as I discoverd it was just some guy talking out of his a#%, same as this latest ESPN baloney.
ESPN may think that the basketball world ends at the US border, but they are failing to understand that it is a hugely popular sport around the world(some say #2 behind soccer), that Toronto has both tons of native-born basketball fans and many more fans immigrating in every year and that MLSE is one of the richest ownership groups in the league(~$75 Billion in assets). On top of all that, Toronto and Canada are increasingly producing promising basketball that is being honed in US prep schools and colleges.
This post is mostly a directionless rant, but sign me up for the “Yes” option.
Toronto as an NBA team
It strikes me that Toronto is at a disadvantage when it comes to “location” but hear me out.
It all comes down to winning. At the end of the day that’s the base line for all sports. If the Raptors were putting a winning product on the floor year in and year out then players would want to come to Toronto. The problem lies in the fact that when a team struggles AND is in another country there is little incentive to want to go. Minnesota and Toronto are not comparable as “cities” but if you lived and played basketball your whole life in North Carolina and was told you would be drafted to the Wolves or the Raptors you would probably hope to be drafted by the Wolves. Both franchises are expected to struggle but atleast Minny is at least an American city (home). A lot of these guys don’t know much about the world beyond their backyard. Ed Davis didn’t even have a passport.
Of course if the Raps were winning and making regular appearances on ESPN then it would be a different story. When Vince and the Raps were in the playoffs there was lots of eyes on the Raptors. If the product was a good one the stigma would slowly disappear. Actually I would argue if the Raps won games on a regular basis not only would they have the ability to attract US born players with ease but they would still have an advantage when taping into the European market. The Raps could have the best of both worlds.
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on Jul 30, 2010 8:50 AM EDT reply actions
I don’t know if the Raptors would ever make really regular appearances on ESPN unless they are granted a broadcast license in Canada.
As far as living conditions Minneapolis-St Paul is both colder and more isolated(further from other major centres) than Toronto, but it is in the US so you are right about that. Supposedly, Minny has a great theatre and arts scene, which I am sure is of great concern to NBA players ;) Toronto would have the advantage of being in the same time zone as NC, so at least the player could more easily call his family after games!
Yeah....
Minny was just an example. Could think of a half dozen.
If the Raps won games they would get US air time.
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on Jul 30, 2010 9:09 AM EDT up reply actions
The issue is not getting US airtime – it is the viewership size. If a game including two American teams is broadcast in the states, the commercial value of that game is quite high. However, if half of the viewers for the game (the Toronto fans) are viewing it not on ESPN, but on a Canadian broadcast, the commercial value is cut in half.
by dhackett1565 on Jul 30, 2010 9:12 AM EDT up reply actions
The issue is "airtime"
You think if the Raps consistently won games US networks would not be forced to show them at least some of the time? As a result, more exposure, less stigma and a smaller issue.
The point is if this team WON this would be less of an issue.
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on Jul 30, 2010 9:19 AM EDT up reply actions
Air time vs. winning
In the 80s the Leafs sucked, but they were consistently shown on English CBC far more than any other Canadian team (back when there was only one saturday night game). This was during the Gretzky-era in Edmonton and with the Flames consistently among the NHLs top teams.
Airtime and winning
Totaly agree with Howland. Winning teams get Air time on ESPN and on the ABC weekend broadcast, not to mention the fam picked game of the week on NBA TV. However, the real airtime promised land is the Playoffs. When in the playoffs you are guaranteed to be on US TV because you are playing a US team and most if not all series now a days are on National TV. So when you win, you’re in the Playoffs, and when you’re in the playoffs you are on National US TV.
In my opinion the difference in advantage in attracting/retaining players between Toronto and say Utah is negligible. Utah is in a predominantly Morman state which operates almost like a de facto seperate republic with its own quirky laws and culture. The major difference is Utah has a strong, well managed, well operated organization with a great coach and system.
Agreed, ESPN would probably love to drop San Antonio games from their schedule, but Popovich and Duncan won’t allow them to do that.
However, some markets(LA, Chicago, NY) have a natural advantage as far as garnering air time due to their large “US-based” populations. Their teams can be terrible and they will still get coverage because advertisers want access to those markets.
To get coverage on ESPN the Raptors will need to draw the interest of Americans, whether by winning or by having player(s) that American want to watch. Who knows, if all the US-based Sopranos viewers suddenly fell in love with Bargnani next year then the team might find itself getting a lot more exposure down south.
Agreed, I don’t think anyone could dispute that NY, LA and a few select others have an inharent advantage due to population size and being centres of the American media universe.
San Antonio is the perfect example. Small town Texas team, however one of, if not the best managed organizations in the league and they are always on tv.
LOL @ Sopranos fans tuning in to see bargani… until they find out he’s more wet noodle than mobster…
I'll even give you an example
After our “Miracle” 2006-2007 special year, there was all this talk about one or two games on ESPN for 2007-2008… Until the Raptors drastically fell down to earth. Would that have ballooned had we sustained that momentum? I think so. Gotta remember too that ESPN and the NBA created a whole special for that year about how good the Raptors were (I still have it on my hard drive… Good times) and I don’t doubt for a moment that we would have had more games broadcast in the states if we weren’t such a flash in the pan.
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on Jul 30, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
ya I agree i don’t think Boston is a desirable NBA destination but since they have a winning culture they can win. to me L.A would be the most desirable destination because it has a winning culture and because of the whole hollywood thing
by raptors_run_the_show on Jul 30, 2010 10:56 AM EDT up reply actions
David Anderson
Someone in Houston isn’t a fan of Mr. Anderson:
“Andersen was such a non-factor for the Rockets last year, that had he been injured for the entire season, it might have helped the team.”
http://blogs.chron.com/jeromesolomon/2010/07/rockets_david_andersen.html
Awesome
As many were stating yesterday, this “asset” is looking better and better by the minute!
Touche...
I am just a fan with an opinion. I would never claim to be any kind of source or authority on anything.
Well played, it seems we will be formidable opponents...
I just want something of substance to happen this summer regarding the Raptors. We will meet again…
PNUTZ is half right
DW19 definitely is a formidable opponent, the rest of the equation remains to be seen.
Forget “Airtime” on ESPN, the team can barely get news coverage in the Toronto media.
Here’s the chicken and the egg.. how do you build a winning team, when you have to over pay players to come? The draft bias is already huge in the NBA system, but even more so with the Raps. Who have been the Raptors star players in it’s history? Guys that have been drafted with high picks. How many significant free agents have signed here? 2.
Cap space is slightly overated if you’re not going to be able to use it on Larry Bird situations.
Everyone who signed the summer when Glen Grunwald threw down 200 million bones was a FA except for Carter.
Would you have enjoyed the Raps be involved heavily in this FA class? Aside from the top 3 (extremely good value – all paid less than Amare), I’m not really miffed at missing out on the majority of those signings.
Draft your own guys, sign guys to complement. That’s basically all you have to do, but it generally requires you finding your first AS in the draft aside from the Arenas/Boozer loophole since no star player wants to come to a barren team.
How many big free agents have changed the faces of franchises?
http://bleacherreport.com/articles/413669-the-10-best-nba-free-agent-signings-ever#page/1
There is a list of top 10 free agent signings in nba history and the impact they have had on their teams. Aside from Shaq to the Lakers it is very difficult to think of any major star changing teams and leading teams to titles. In the nba it really is a process, drafting well, signing good role players and building team chemistry. Our problem, BC feels like his head is on the chopping block. This is causing him to go for band aid solutions instead of long term solutions. In start with the GM, then to the head coach and the players, you need consistency to build chemistry and build a core.
This is much to do about nothing...
Bosh and Carter both signed extensions before leaving. MoPete was given more money elsewhere and McGrady left because he wasn’t happy being a number two..
LeBron left Cleveland where he was born and raised for sh*t sakes…
All this discussion does is make us look like a bunch of whiners.. We approach our sports teams with the same “woe is me” attitude and as a result, ALL of them suck.. And THAT’S what people in the US have a problem with. We’re pus*y’s. If someone doesn’t want to be here for any reason – *uck em’.. If you’re that bothered by it, burn a jersey. Depression is merely anger that lacks enthusiasm.. otw lets move on…
McGrady left because he wanted to play in South Florida (his home). He was supposed to be #2 to Grant Hill, though nobody there seems to remember Hill ever having played for the Magic.
Ok totally off topic but too funny not too share...
If yawl haven’t read this yet, please read. Not only is it hilarious, it’s an interesting read of how Ron Artest has dealt with mental illness and a troubled child hood. Great redemption story… But some of this is just toooooo funny, some gems:
“WHERE ARE YOU MOST AT PEACE?
At the beach. Man, give me a mango drink, some sand, that water, and it’s all good. I love running in the sand. But sometimes I’m scared as hell of water. Whenever I’m out there, I’m thinking, “Damn, some tidal wave is about to come!” Okay, so maybe I’m not totally at peace at the beach."
Ok so I guess RonRon is never at peace! LOL
“NOW THAT YOU’VE WON A TITLE, DO YOU STILL HAVE ANY PERSONAL GOALS IN THE NBA?
I would love to get back to first-team All-Defense. I own defense. It’s like my corporation. I’m the CEO and everyone else is just an employee. The fans and players know I belong. When you need a stop, who you going to call? Not the goddamn Ghostbusters, I’ll tell you that. You call me.”
“Not the goddamn Ghostbusters” LMAO! That’s classic material Ron!
“DO YOU STILL WANT TO PLAY FOR TEAM USA?
I want a gold medal so bad, I’d be the water boy. But they won’t even let me try out! I’ve been trying to get on that team forever. Three years ago, I called Jerry Colangelo. He answered the phone. I said, “Hi, this is Ron Artest,” and the dude hung up! At least let me try out. Give me a chance to represent the ghettos of America. Come on, Team USA! I don’t have much time left."
The fact that Ron called Jerry Collangelo and then Jerry immediately hung up on him is the funniest thing I’ve heard all week.
Oh and RonRon’s favorite movie? Titanic. Of course it is… : )
Here’s the link, watch the video too: http://sports.espn.go.com/nba/news/story?id=5417748
it was pretty classic when...
Ron Artest had the first interview on live TV after the Lakers won the Championship… and his thoughts were…
… I would like to thank my psychiatrist…!
I can’t wait for a politician to say something like this after being elected….lol
The headline
could have had just about any NBA city in it. Most Phoenix fans would certainly agree with the statement. A winning team does make a huge difference tho’ to getting second tier players which puts you in the playoff mix.
The national media talking heads are generally a year behind on any news that doesn’t concern one of the 3 or 4 big name players or the Lakers/Celtics so they tend to be irrelevant to small market teams. They should be ignored.
This was a great interview – like what I’m hearing from him. Wonder what the coaching staff and him plan to do to improve his rebounding?
by dhackett1565 on Jul 30, 2010 11:27 AM EDT up reply actions
They’re splicing Mose Malone’s DNA into Bargnani’s body
by scrat on Jul 30, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions 1 recs
Thanks for the link Ustation, going to talk about this and the Bosh interview he did with Sportsnet tomorrow…
Scrat – I think only the Suns’ scientists have the ability to do such procedures. Heard they spliced Gordie Howe’s DNA into Grant Hill two years ago…
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Franchise on Jul 30, 2010 12:57 PM EDT up reply actions
no superstar needed...
Just a good solid lineup in Toronto will be competitive.
IMO they should join the Rudy Fernandez trade talks. Portland wants to get rid of Rudy and Pryzbilla and Toronto has some pieces they can give to probably land Rudy and join his fellow Spaniard Jose Calderon and play great basketball together.
A scenario would be…
A.)
Toronto gives:
Reggie Evans, Marco Bellineli and Joey Dorsey/Sonny Weems or a 2nd round pick.
to Portland for
Rudy Fernandez, Joel Pryzbilla or add a 2nd round pick (if it includes DOrsey/Weems.)
or
B.)
Toronto gives:
Marcus Banks, Reggie Evans
to Portland for
Rudy, Pryzbilla and S&T Patrick Mills (to even the salary since Banks and Evans is 9 Mil while Rudy and Pryz is only 8M) or Dante Cunningham/Jeff Pendergraph.
Fernandez is a offensive juggernaut and with him and DeRozan playing at the same time that’s a one-two punch on the offensive end already. And if healthy, Pryzbilla could provide big man depth and possibly can slide Bargnani into the PF spot. If he’s not, well his contract is expiring in a year so it’s not so bad.
A staring 5 of Calderon, Fernandez, DeRozan, Amir Johnson, Bargnani sounds competitive especially in the East when pretty much the Heat, Celtics, Magic, Hawks, Bulls (and maybe the Bucks) are the only ones considered “locks” in the playoffs as of now.
Though defensively it does not sound pretty amazing, but they can learn to adjust. They’re basketball players.
just an opinion.
Idiot here
Isn’t the Canadian dollar also a factor? (I know at one point it had its fleeting moment of glory but that is over, for now at least) Or does MLSE bear the burden? I could’ve sworn the darkest days of the CDN to USD exchange forced the Nordiques and Jets to jump ship. (Much smaller markets with decrepit arenas, of course, whereas MLSE could coat the ACC in freaking 24K gold if they wanted!)
However, I doubt the Raptors will ever leave Toronto; if I have to flip a coin, I would think the Skydome would finally meet its demise, pulling the Jays along with it. I remember when I was 6, reading a book about the greatest architectural feats of man going from ancient to modern and the Skydome was the last page in the book, and it was an albatross even then AHAHAHA!
"Skillet, we just spent $64,000 in that bar. So we're gonna have to get jobs to cover up the fact that we rob banks" -Mouse Fitzgerald
I believe they all get paid in USD – the CAD would actually help them out if its goes down as they would be making more (USD) and spending less in Canada (when they live here)
Its the tax situation that was said to be a problem but that too was untrue as its on par with all the other big cities…
americans dont know shit about anything other than america and frankly I could care less about their opnions..
Regarding tanking
A suggestion for a possible future thread: How do you tank without ruining the spirit of the young players you are trying to develop? Also, players on bad teams tend to develop bad habits. Considering the thing we like so much about the Young Gunz is their work ethic and attitude, how do we keep that in tact while sucking enough to get another couple of talented building blocks through the draft? Lastly, how do we suck enough to acquire good talent while not simultaneously giving that incoming talent the impression that Toronto is a bad place to play and a losing organization, etc…? To me this all seems like a very fine balancing act. Clubs that attempt this are really walking a razor’s edge.
By playing the crap out of the players you are looking to develop. If they win then all the better but more than likely they will lose.
I agree with this, but you have to do it carefully, too. You don’t want the young guys getting too discouraged from losing all the time and you don’t want them to develop bad habits. Many times you see guys on bad teams who basically say to themselves “if we can’t win at least I am going to get mine.” Obviously, that is not what you want to have happen. Getting character young guys is a start and having a few solid vets to teach them good habits will help, too. But, at a certain point, if the young guys do the right things and the vets help out then the team will start winning. That is great, but it might lead to what people around here don’t want which is for the team to drift up towards .500, a late-lottery pick and no future superstar.
McGrady ... Carter ... and Bosh
McGrady was gone one way or another, but both Bosh and Carter stuck around to sign a second contract so it wasn’t exactly the Memphis Grizzlies. And had management built Championship contending teams around them, I doubt they’d be (or have gone) elsewhere.
To say Toronto hasn’t been able to build a Contender (around Carter & Bosh), contradicts the main focus of today’s post – we can’t get F/Agents (or trade-able players) to come to Canada. I realize the draft is one other option, but for most teams that make it to the Finals, topping up the talent level requires going outside, in order to balance out the roster.
.
That ESPN crap ……. As someone said before, they’re still pissed about the Canadian access thing. I really could care less what they think. Tunnel vision is far too common down there.
.
With regard to Canada ….. I really believe that our obscurity is slowly giving way, because of the Internet, and all the information accessible. Before hand, it was left up to their educational system, a narcissistic entity if there ever was one. And my apologies to those Americans who run counter to this persona.
.
A Championship Model - that gets around the Toronto BS
.
As I’ve mentioned before, maybe the Raps need to emulate the Detroit Pistons model – no Superstars. It seemed to work for them. A good group of players, who play like a TEAM.
.
Forgot to Mention
.
Franchise,
I have to say, I like these type of debates. It helps put “excuses” on a proper footing. Plus, we can’t blame BC for Canada being viewed as the “ass-end” of the NBA. …… :-)
.
by RapthoseLeafs on Jul 30, 2010 1:44 PM EDT up reply actions
Problem is that the Detroit model doesn’t work nearly as often as the Superstar and supporting cast model. If you like, you can think of a third model: three amigos and scrubs, which seems to be all the rage these days.
Detroit Model - tough to follow
.
I agree … the Detroit model doesn’t work nearly as often as the Superstar & cast. Unfortunately, Raptors & Superstars don’t seem to mix well either.
.
by RapthoseLeafs on Jul 30, 2010 3:23 PM EDT up reply actions
I think the article is right but comes to the wrong conclusion
Yes Toronto has a tougher time obtaining and keeping players… however that doesn’t mean that Toronto shouldn’t have a team.
If enough fans go to games, watch games, buy gear etc. to keep it profitable there will always be a team here. That can be done regardless of whether big name players are here or not. (there is likely enough Canadian and non-north american support to keep it going and profitable)
However, we as fans need to appreciate that this organization being in Toronto is going to be an added handicap when it comes to players. While it maybe that ‘winning cures all’, it also must be realized it will be more difficult to create that winning culture (or winning team) when players are harder to obtain, seem to need to be ‘overpaid’, or want to chase those bigger endorsement deals in the states.
We need to be less concerned about contracts, more supportive of players who actually want to be here, are less focused on the ‘big name’ players.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Jul 30, 2010 2:39 PM EDT reply actions
Canada & the Luxury Tax
.
As some have alluded to, the Raps need to pay a “premium” to snag those free agents out there – enough so they forget they’re in a foreign country.
As such, Toronto has to start zeroing into Luxury tax land, more so than other teams. One only has to look at how much the top 4 teams in each conference spent (out of 9 top spending teams – New York excepted). We need to spend, and of course, not foolishly either. Just spend. We don’t right now (and never have), which is why we’re always on the outside, looking in – wondering what it’s all like.
.
Didn’t that Grunwald spending spree for Vince and Co go into the luxury tax level?
I agree that going into luxury tax level payrolls definitely improves your odds of winning the championship, but it doesn’t guarantee it either. New York Knicks were the poster child for foolishly spending at luxury tax levels with horrible results.
I guess I disagree with you on the timing of when to go into luxury tax. I think you do it when you have the core (or most of it) in place. You start paying that tax to get the one or two players that put you in contention for the championship and you keep paying it until it’s clear your team has run its course. I guess the Celtic model of having one all-star player and then going deep into the luxury tax bracket to get two more all-stars is another way to go.
FWIW, the more I think about it, the more it seems to me that the Miami Heat have just a couple of years to win before that team implodes due to egos. The Boston big three were all much older mature players.
We have generally been on the edge of the luxury tax, but I don’t feel we’ve ever had a good enough team to make entering the luxury tax sensible.
Teams that go into luxury tax are often bogged down with big, long-term deals. That makes it extremely hard to be flexible if you realize your team needs tweaking. And any version of the Raptors in luxury tax would still have been a deeply flawed team.
JOEY!
Joey Graham agrees to a two-year deal with Cavaliers with terms undisclosed, his agent Byron Irvin tells Yahoo! Sports.
http://twitter.com/SpearsNBAYahoo/statuses/19916276427
Can we get any more ex-Raptors on the Cavs?
Jamario Moon, Anthony Parker, and Joey Graham… how about they sign Kris Humphries and Rasho, then trade for TJ Ford and Delfino?
Nobody wants to come to Canada?
I think we might be over-thinking this issue. The thing that attracts talent to your team is a culture of winning and success, not the geographic location. While some places may be more attractive than others (e.g. no income tax in Florida), I think by and large, talent gravitate towards teams with good management and a winning culture.
Unfortunately, Toronto hasn’t been a legitimate championship contender throughout its history. Furthermore, our management and coaching staff have sometimes been the laugh of the league (e.g. Butch Carter, Rob Babcock). As was noted in the post, Toronto was able to get both VC and Bosh to re-sign with us when the team was experiencing success. Had we continued to have success, I think we likely would have been able to retain those players.
To say that Toronto can’t field a contending team because we can’t attract star talent is a short-sighted view of the NBA. With the exception of the Three Dream Team, superstar players usually do not change teams through free agency given the current salary structure that we have. Tim Duncan, Kobe Bryant, Paul Pierce and Dirk Nowitzki are good examples of this. Rarely do superstar, franchise-changing players leave their teams via free agency.
I think what we have to blame for not fielding a competitive team is our management and coaching staff for failing to construct a successful franchise. While in some cases decisions may partially be based on location, the bigger issue is our inability to build a winner and draft successful players.














