A Statistical Look At the 2009-2010 Raptors Season
Wonder what the most effective offensive set was for the Raps this season? Is the Raptors most effective offensive set the one they use the most?
How bad were the Raptors on defense this season? Where are the weaknesses?
Thanks to SB Nation and Synergy Sports we now have some answers.
Being part of the SB Nation has it's perks. Last week each NBA Blog was provided access to the Synergy Sports web site which to quote their site -
offers the same online video scouting tools used by the coaches, scouts and general managers at your favorite NBA teams. Synergy Sports provides the pros with one-of-a-kind statistics on types of plays run, player moves and player tendencies—this information is not available anywhere else!
Since gaining access I can honestly say this is the most comprehensive basketball web-site I have ever seen and the amount of information it provides is almost overwhelming.
Over time I am sure we will be using this site regularly to help break down the strengths and weaknesses of both the Raptors as a team, and for individual players.
To kick it off we thought we would recap the Raptors season as a whole from a high level. It's a revealing, but far from shocking, story.
Offense
No-one questions the Raptors ability to put the ball in the hoop. Averaging more than 100 points per game there was never any complaint about the offense. What made the Raptors offense so lethal? Well here is a quick breakdown.
Over the course of the season the Raptors had almost 8500 offensive possessions which led to either a FTA, a turn-over or free-throws. Based on the results of those 8466 plays the Raptors managed almost 1 point per play (0.99 to be exact), which was second best in the league.
It's how the Raps got those points which was telling.
For the most part the Raps got their offense through jumpers. Of the Raptors 8466 possessions, 23.2% resulted in a jumper. This was by far and away the most prominent part of the Raptors offense. In terms of percentages the second most frequent result was a Pick & Roll with the Ball Handler (14.3%), a transition possession (12.1%) and then a tie between an isolation play (11.6%) and a post-up play (11.6%).
Out of the five most frequent possession types what was the post effective in terms of putting points on the board? The spot-up shooting resulted in 1.05 points per posses ion ("ppp"), meanwhile the P&R with the Ball Handler resulted in 0.89 ppp, transition 1.12 ppp, isolation 0.86 ppp and post-up play 1.03 ppp.
The results should not be surprising. The Raps, for the most part played up to their strengths. The team was full of shooters and they shot a high percentage. The team also had a dominant PF who when fed the ball in the post, produced. In fact, somewhat surprisingly, the Raps had the number one ranked post-up offense in the NBA. Yup, the Raptors produced the most ppp in post-up situations. No Chris Bosh next year? Expect that number to change.
Defense
This is where things get a little more interesting and when I look back on this past season it really will be the brutal defense that I will remember.
So what went wrong?
Well, pretty much everything. The Raps ranked dead last in terms of ppp when the opposing team's possession featured a cut to the hoop (1.38 ppp) or an off the ball screen (1.01 ppp) and they were in the bottom third when the opponents ran pick and roll (both with the Ball Handler and off the ball), ran plays for a spot-up jumpers and when they were in transition. The only categories where the Raps put up a decent performance? Isolation plays, post-ups and shots off of offensive rebounds.
Based on the statistics it's clear that the Raptors perimeter defense is as bad as advertised and any offensive play where the Raps would need to rely on help defense they failed. The decent performance in post-ups and isolations also proves than in one-on-one situations that the Raps can, generally, hold their own, it's when a defender has to rely on a teammate when things go bad.
This ties into what Vicious D talked about yesterday in terms of bringing in some new assistant coaches. The stats tell us that whatever defensive system was in place last year was ineffective at best. The Raps have some major work to do in this department, perhaps more so in the coaching department than the players on the court. The system, whatever it was, simply doesn't work.
I'll admit, there is more to take from these stats than I have covered here and I am by no means a statistician but what they tell us is that change is required, or more specifically a philosophical change.
Here's hoping Colangelo and staff are taking these types of statistics seriously - RHQ sure will be.
Disclosure: Synergy Sports Tech has provided RaptorsHQ with a free My Synergy account.
35 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Stirring things up...
I just want to start the debate by suggesting that the Raptors relative competence in defending the post up may mean that the Bargnani-defenders have a point that he is not that bad a post defender ;)
Of course, Bargs has to take a decent share of the blame for the team’s incompetence at help defense(along with the coaches and the rest of the team).
I think that’s the point of contention. A lot of people consider “post defense” to be help defense. Others believe that defending the one-on-one situations are more important. It depends on where you want to place the emphasis on things.
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on May 4, 2010 10:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Yeah, let’s define Howland’s “decent performance” before we anoint Bargs as a good post defender. I think “decent” for the Raptors means “not historically awful” – which is what their defence was as a whole.
I think the fact that the Raptors were giving up that many points per possession on cuts to the hoop is an indictment of BOTH the starting bigs. But I’d feel a helluva lot better pairing a productive Bosh with a centre who could rebound and defend as opposed to a below-average Bargnani. Call me a hater, but I’m just being realistic.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2010 10:54 AM EDT up reply actions
hater
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on May 4, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Hater
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on May 4, 2010 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions
Haha. Everyone will be drinking the Haterade next season when Bargnani is “leading” the 18-win Raptors.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Haterade
.
Are you getting on the FAQ bandwagon, and betting a 3-30 start.
.
by RapthoseLeafs on May 5, 2010 12:53 AM EDT up reply actions
I will reserve judgement until I see the offseason moves in combination with the strength of schedule to begin the season. LOL
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 5, 2010 9:36 AM EDT up reply actions
I think that is right
Bargs is not a bad post defender. He is however slow to react when he is required to rotate or help-out. What the stats tell us however is that this was a TEAM issue. Whether it was chemistry, system or something else, fixing it is necessary.
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on May 4, 2010 10:55 AM EDT up reply actions
Definitely an element of coaching/system at work here. I mean, I firmly believe that someone like Larry Brown or Scott Skiles would’ve coaxed a better defensive performance out of this roster. Maybe it only results in a few more wins and a lower seed in the East – but it would’ve been better than what Jay Triano and his incompetent defensive guru Marc Iavaroni came up with.
Chemistry? Well, if you’re a coach with no backbone who is handing minutes to guys regardless of performance, the chemistry on your squad is going to be awful to non-existent. You can only use the Euros vs. Americans excuse so many times before you look around at teams like San Antonio and realize it’s a bunch of crap.
That being said, let’s assume Bargs is a good post defender. Rotations and knowing when to help are such a MASSIVE part of defending (particularly for a big man), I fail to see how Bargs is going to get to that place where he’s not a liability on the floor. Just because somebody blocks a shot a game doesn’t make them a good defender.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2010 11:10 AM EDT up reply actions
Hate hate hate
:)
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on May 4, 2010 11:46 AM EDT up reply actions
Good data
These statistics are fantastic. Here’s hoping that the Raptors will use them to our benefit.
Regarding Bargs D, BC aknowledged that he is clueless on weak side defence. So goes it, and like any other season this is something for him to work on. In a year we can apparaise his growth.
If Jay strengthens his backbone, and not to S’Mitch levels (too much backbone), and puts in his study time – then once again we will appraise him then. I think we are simply going to have to accept this.
Regarding San Antonio as a Euro-freindly place, isn’t Spanish a dominant language there? I get what you are saying DS, but I think we are reeling without a UN Secretary-General type (like AP).
Totally agree with you on the loss of AP. Sure, he’s on the decline statistically speaking – but I think it’s obvious they missed what he brought in terms of leadership and chemistry.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2010 12:29 PM EDT up reply actions
I think BC had every right to believe that Bosh could shoulder AP’s leadership load. The guy wants to be a max player afterall. I think we can all agree that Bosh failed in that regard. Can you see Kobe or Lebron putting up with AB or Turk half-assing all season?
Gotta agree
I think for the most part this has been over looked this season. Just about every decent team has that player (or players) who will hold the others accountable. Bosh had a hell of a season and was by far and large the best player on the roster, but sometimes leading by example ain’t enough. Sometimes players need to be “embarrassed” into performing better. Bosh’s refusal to yell at his under performing teamates had an adverse affect on this team. As much as Triano has had a problem holding his players accountable, so did our team captain.
Despite...
my hate above these are all valid points.
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on May 4, 2010 12:36 PM EDT up reply actions
Rotations
I think Barg’s hesitation to leave his man wide open under the net is understandable. He probably hates to give up that dish and dunk. He needs to be made to understand that his player is now the responsiblity of the secondary rotation. As far as the high “pic and roll” , I’ve seen him do a good job on that.
Anyway, I realize that for some of you that it doesn’t matter what he does.
I did read somewhere that Bargs was the 13th best post defender in the league this year (stastistically), but I can’t remember where I read it. The fact that he is clueless on how to play help defense falls on both the coaches and Bargs himself. If a guy can defend his position one on one, why is he unable to play or understand the concepts of team defense? There is no doubt that some blame has to fall on his shoulders whether it be laziness or a lack of focus, but inevitably the coaches have to be blamed for not being able to get the information across to their players. The fact that he excelled in one area at least gives us some hope for improvement (only if a coach that can actually teach team defense is hired). I felt Bosh and Bargs were both brutal at defending cuts to the basket as well. Although I think Bargs was a little more aggressive than Bosh in trying to make a play on the cutter. Bosh on the other hand would just let the cutter score an easy layup with no real effort at a stop. This is why I don’t think that these two should be playing side by side in any rotation.
I think Barg’s biggest problem is that he doesn’t have very good basketball instincts. This shows up in rebounding. The instinctive players anticipate where the rebound is going and get into position. With Bargs, it’s more reactive. He has to see the ball hit the rim before doing anything. The other place the lack of instincts shows up is in help defense. If he had the instincts, he could anticipate the play happening and begin to react as the play develops. Without the instincts, he has to read the play and then react, but then it’s frequently too late.
Of course, I could be completely full of sh*t.
Here are some embarassing stats
Hedo:
41% FG and 11.3 pts/game
Bargnani:
35 minutes/game, and only 6.2 rebounds
Triano:
At least 500 minutes of the Calderon+Jack experiment, when it was clear after about 5 minutes that it is a defensive disaster when those 2 are on the floor together.
Don't forget...
Turkoglu + Calderon + Jack… which was even worse!
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on May 4, 2010 4:56 PM EDT up reply actions
bosh has it in him
Just reading some of the post and agree with a lot of what you guys are saying.back to bosh being more of a leader and getting at his teammates,he’s soon before that he does it.in bargs rookie year when we played golden state and beidrus was outworking bargs bosh was on the bench and gave it too bargs to try harder and sure enough bargs had a great year after that.I’ve seen bosh get at jack, and tj ford and jermario moon got an ear full from bosh when moon messed up on how to cover joe johnson, johnson scored and the hawks won the game.all I remember was watching both really get at moon.so bosh has shown in the past to get at teammates don’t know why we didn’t see enough of it.
by sherwin316 on May 4, 2010 5:36 PM EDT via mobile reply actions
we also...
don’t know what goes on behind closed doors.
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on May 4, 2010 6:05 PM EDT up reply actions
What do you mean?
Are you insinuating that Bosh would get after teamates putting out a subpar effort behind closed doors? Or are you saying that there was some unseen force that may have been preventing him from getting after his teamates?
yo i think you guy should do a whole article on bosh’s tweet because i feel there is a lot of weight behind it and i would like to see what the majority of the fans thought
by raptors_run_the_show on May 4, 2010 8:35 PM EDT reply actions
I think
it was one of them “freudian slips”. Know what I mean?
I don't think there's any real weight on it.
He’s not going to make his decision based on a twitter poll. He may just want to know how much love there still is for him in this city, but honestly, I also want to see what Colangelo does before we make a move for Bosh. Because while I haven’t said it, if BC merely brings back Bosh and signs Johnson to an extension, that’s not enough.
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on May 4, 2010 9:20 PM EDT up reply actions
we need to sign joe johnson if bosh is going to stay but that is unlikley
by raptors_run_the_show on May 4, 2010 9:35 PM EDT up reply actions
Uhhh... I meant Amir Johnson lol
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on May 4, 2010 11:05 PM EDT up reply actions
what pissed me off was his first tweet it confirms to me that he is going to leave like now i have no doubt in my mind that he is going to leave and the fact that he his asking his fans is a little disrespectful to the Raptors
by raptors_run_the_show on May 4, 2010 9:18 PM EDT reply actions
sensitive much? he clarified in his second post – if he was leaving there’d be no reason to do that.
by dhackett1565 on May 4, 2010 10:30 PM EDT up reply actions
if bosh really wants to help us then he should go to houston. he will go to a contender (if bosh goes to houston it will be a contender),he might now be the go to guy if yao is there. it would be better if we got ariza then battier
by raptors_run_the_show on May 6, 2010 7:46 AM EDT up reply actions

by 











