Tip-In: Inches - Felton's 3 Gives Knicks the Win Despite 41 from Raptors' Bargnani
It was another case of talent edging out effort as Raymond Felton's 3-pointer with seconds left sent the New York Knicks to a 110-107 win over the Toronto Raptors...
With 6:40 left in the second quarter, Jerryd Bayless dribbled, faked, and then pulled up for a jumper.
It hit the rim...
...the rim...
...and then dropped in.
Foreshadowing doesn't get any better than that.
Raymond Felton hit a game-winning 3-point jumper with 2.7 seconds left to give the New York Knicks a 110 - 107 win over the Toronto Raptors, a jumper that bounced no less than five times around said rim before finally finding a home through the mesh.
Game over.
Well, not quite.
Andrea Bargnani had one last shot at the tie but his long, long-range 3 came up short at the buzzer.
For the Knicks, the win was their 11th in the last 12, and Amar'e Stoudemire led the way scoring wise with 34 points, all the while grabbing 14 rebounds.
For Toronto, it was the Andrea Bargnani show.
41 points on a very efficient 16 of 24 shooting, 9 free-throw attempts, 7 rebounds, 6 assists, 2 steals...there wasn't much more Bargs could have done to try and bring home the W for his team. I counted one forced shot all night (not including the final desperation heave) and for the first time in ages he consistently looked to get his teammates involved when he felt they were better options.
Unfortunately Bargs just didn't get enough offensive help, and again, the team's overall D couldn't get the job done when it mattered. Let's look at the first point to start.
Jose Calderon, Linas Kleiza, Sonny Weems and Leandro Barbosa were a combined 13 of 37 on the night, good for 35% from the field. DeMar DeRozan chipped in 19, and Jerryd Bayless had 10, but it's pretty hard to beat teams with shooting like that from your surrounding cast, especially if you're not getting stops.
And to say Toronto got stops would be like saying Kanye West's new album has been a flop both critically and commercially.
The Knicks shot 48% from the field and in the fourth quarter proved unstoppable via the pick and roll as the game became a match of "who's going to miss first."
This brings me to my second point.
If you boil this loss down, to me it really was about the defense.
Because let's face it, both teams put on an offensive clinic and it really was tit-for-tat through most of the line-up.
-DeRozan had 19 points, but he allowed Landry Fields 9 of his own as well as 10 rebounds which gave the Knicks key extra possessions.
-Calderon had 11 points, but was torched by Raymond Felton to the tune of 28 and 11.
-Guys like Weems, Kleiza and Bayless had their moments offensively, but allowed Wilson Chandler and Danilo Gallinari to go off for 34 between them.
-And while Bargs had 15 in the fourth quarter, Amar'e was just a tad better with 18, and outrebounded Andrea 5 to 1.
Without that ability to get stops, you need to play an almost perfect offensive game, and Toronto made too many small errors executionally down the stretch for this to occur.
An (albeit speedy looking) five-second call here, a bad shot by Kleiza there, a dumb foul by Ed Davis with two seconds left in the half and the Knicks in bonus...these types of things all add up over the course of a game and as we've said all season, with the Raptors lack of Grade A talent, their margin of error is so small that they can't afford miscues like these.
In spite of the loss though, this was one of the most entertaining matches of the year, a true back-and-forth, knock-down-drag-out affair. Toronto put forth an excellent effort, a very encouraging sign coming off two losses were this effort was pretty non-existent.
As well, the Raptors were obviously much-more prepared, limiting the Knicks to only 8 of 21 shooting from downtown, a good sign for a young team looking to improve with each match.
Couple these points with Andrea Bargnani's monster night and you hope the team can take these positives back home Friday when the Denver Nuggets are in town. The Nuggs were without star Carmelo Anthony last night due to knee issues, so perhaps the team lucks out yet again and faces a premier team that's missing one of its best.
Regardless of Melo's playing status however the match with Denver will be a tough fight and Toronto will need another big game from Andrea Bargnani.
Post-game the NBA.com crew noted that he had "a little Dirk in him," but "just a little."
For Bargs to truly take the next step he needs to put together a string of complete games like this, games where he's bound and determined to be the focal point on offence and if his shot isn't dropping, he's getting to the line, contributing in other ways, and acting as a decoy to get others involved.
And it would certainly be a boost if he could get a little more help from his teammates.
168 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Positivity and Objectivity
Franchise, you have been doing an excellent job of giving praise where praise is due, and laying blame on those who deserve it!
Great write up!
+300000
WAYYY too much negativity last night… you were positive yet realistic and objective… great write up
Negativity during the chat? I missed it…ended up watching the RapsTV version of the game later in the evening and to me, this was a great effort against a pretty decent team.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions
Great post Franchise! Your great insight is why Raps HQ is tops on my favorites list. Last night’s during and post game comments after a hard fought loss really left a sour taste in my mouth. I think DS should go on hiatus for a while…help him find his inner peace!
by Assistant GM on Dec 9, 2010 12:00 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
not trying to be a troll
but what would it take to our # 7 to be considered a grade A talent? Before the usual self appointed oracles scream D, let me ask, do you consider Amare a grade A talent? if yes, can we talk about his D? They did their best to to have him defending Andrea as he would have been constantly beaten.
I believe that is (yet again) a transition season for Andrea. I am sure more than somebody (including the coaching staff) has bough into the idea of running the offense trough him and I believe we’ll see more of that till he’ll earn to be a consistent passer out of the low post. We did not win yesterday because of poor wing production. Bring in a legitimate 3 and yesterday’s game does not get to the buzzer…
What would it take to be considered grade?
Winning. If he had out-dueled Amare in the fourth and Raps won: Grade A. If he did that consistently, he’d be a star despite defensive deficiencies.
But he had an amazing night, was by far our best player. Grade A-.
For several years, I have been telling anybody who would listen,including Franchise, that Bosh and Andrea together was redundant.
I always thought Andrea given the opportunity could be just as good as Bosh was here.
Andrea has not proven that yet, but he is getting there. Bosh is certainly proving my argument that he is nowhere near a max player.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 10:02 AM EST up reply actions
A- is garbage to you?
Are you asking this to benjibopper?
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 11:00 AM EST up reply actions
I’m asking Renato, who responded to my A- grade of Bargs’ performance last night (because they lost) by saying that Bosh must also be garbage (I assume because they usually lost when he had great games too).
Andrea doesn’t have a complete enough game to me to be Grade A talent…yet…he’s still by and large an offensive juggernaut when he’s on, but provides little else statistically. Last night I’m hoping is a great sign of further development.
My favourite part about Bargs last night was 15 fourth quarter points.
HUGE.
AND, he was aggressively calling for the ball, and his teammates were feeding it to him.
As for Bosh, I still view him as a superior talent to Andrea, because of the complete game, and his ability to produce wins. For all his scoring, Bargs hasn’t done that yet. We can heckle all we want about Andrea vs. Bosh but until Bargs starts carrying his team like he did last night, consistently, I’m not ready to put them in the same category.
That being said, like jumpshootersRUS – I HATED the drafting of Andrea not because I didn’t think he was a talented player, but because I never believed he was a good fit with Bosh. I even asked Colangelo about this repeatedly and I think now we’re seeing that indeed, the two just didn’t maximize each others skillsets.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 11:18 AM EST up reply actions
I know you have always agreed on the fit of Bosh and Andrea not being there…meant to include that in that post.
As for Bargs not being on Bosh’s level yet, it is true…
However, I was reading the calculation method for wages of wins this morning. Bargs will never do as well through that calculation as he should.
He is never going to be in a position to grab offensive rebounds. He is either away from the basket on offense or has a man or two between him and the basket on post ups. Offensive rebounds are a very big part of wins produced data. If Bargnani continues to play the role that he does, even if he were to get much more agressive he will never be a good offensive rebounder.
Comparing him to other centers is also a part of how they get the total. Centers and power forwards play more efficient games. If Bargs were to be compared to wing players his WP would rise a bit.
What he is going to need to do to increase his wins produced is get more assists by kicking the ball out of the post, like many great post players do. To do that, he will need to operate more out of the post, be willing to pass consistantly and get a couple of better shooters around him.
I do not have the data in front of me, but I would imagine that Dirk has never been a top 10 WP guy. He has definitely been a top 10 guy in reality though. The WP calculations is one of the most amazing things I have ever seen, but it is not perfect.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 11:56 AM EST up reply actions
What complete game?
The guy was playing solo on O and was as good as Andrea on D (ahum) plus the rebounding, but rebounding != D
Thing is
Bosh and Andrea could have fit nicely if Bosh chose to be more of a defensive presence than offensive one. His energy would have been better used on defense and if he had devoted his game and training to that aspect things would have been mightily different and I wouldn’t argue about Bosh getting the max.
Some will respond by saying “Bargs could have focused on D more” andI’ll counter by saying that the complement would not have been optimal if that were the case because Bosh had to work harder to score than Bargs does. Bargs is so gifted in that area that allowing him to focus there would have been ideal in the Bosh/Bargnani pairing. Bosh could do EVERYTHING Reggie Evans and Amir Johnson do combined and be better at all aspects of it if he wanted to but he didn’t see the value in crafting his game that way. It’s a mental thing an internal drive and unfortunately Bosh’s energy was misapplied and thus we didn’t see the best of that pairing.
Maybe coaches couldn’t get through to him (outside of an Olympic setting) on how SPECIAL he could have been if he chose to develop his game that way.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
by HQ Interloper on Dec 9, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions
I had just jumped the gun
I stopped reading at “Winning” hence, since Bosh era was hardly a winning one, for being consequent I had to ask whether you thought Bosh was garbage
I do not think Bosh is garbage, but I never thought he was great. I always thought he was one of the most overrated players in the league. thought his rebounding was overrated, and his D was usually suspect eventhough he could have played D if he wanted to.
A top 50 guy in the league for sure. Top 25 maybe. Top 15 definitely not. We were never able to win with our all-star. I know people put that on BC, and it was partly because of him, but if Bosh was great we would have won more often.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
Calm down a little no? Andrea had a great game last night, but Amare has been dropping over 30 PPG for like the last 6 or 7. I remember Bosh dropping 40+ on back to back nights more than once. I’m giving him credit he played really well, but as always consistency has been the issue offensively. Defensively we all know where I stand on that. That last shot by Felton was such a fluke, it looked like it should have missed. But all in all, he’s not Grade A in my books. Lot’s of guys can drop 40 once every five seasons.
I am not nervous at all
just food for thoughts
Not quite 40, but here is an example of a run of the mill player filling it up…
Mike James 2005-06 Game Log
DATE PTS
Nov. 13 36
Nov. 16 38
Nov. 20 25
Dec. 28 28
Jan. 3 28
Jan. 6 30
Jan. 8 26
Jan. 22 26
Feb. 1 29
Feb. 8 36
Feb. 13 27
Feb. 25 25
Feb. 27 26
Mar. 7 31
Mar. 8 30
Mar. 10 26
Mar. 21 37
Mar. 22 31
Mar. 31 36
Apr. 5 34
Apr. 7 36
Apr. 9 32
Apr. 11 32
Apr. 14 39
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 9:59 AM EST up reply actions
- might add that mike james’ Defence was damn good too
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 10:13 AM EST up reply actions
MIKE JAMES FOR THE WIN!
Wow.
I remembered James having some big games but that list posted by JumpshootersRUS is insane.
I think it touches on the old adage too that “everyone in the NBA can score.” The key is not just filling up the “PTS” column in the box score, but the “wins” column as well.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 11:21 AM EST up reply actions
" think it touches on the old adage too that "everyone in the NBA can score." The key is not just filling up the "PTS" column in the box score, but the "wins" column as well."
this is exactly where a player becomes important… if what they do translates into wins. And we haven’t had that since the-Vince-who-tried was around. Whether its been Bosh or now Andrea.
Dropping 40+ is great, adding 6 dimes is fantastic… but when you still lose despite that, there is an issue.
For those upset with the ‘negativity’ last night… the Raps still lost, and Andrea’s D and effort on D was as terrible as ever. Scoring points won’t always make up for that… and last night was a prime example. Raps spent 7 years with a offensively gifted talent who did give a lick on D… I don’t want to see another 5 of that.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 11:38 AM EST up reply actions
Absolute BS. He played great defense in the first half and good defense in the 2nd. Amare was taking it to everyone last night, Amir, Davis and in the 4th Andrea.
You give absolute no credit to how great Amare is playing and you don’t hold Jose or Triano responsible for how the 4th played out. Andrea is a good defender and he will get better.
Your rhetoric is over the top and is no where close to being accurate.
I know Amare is a great player
not denying that….
… but I’m not sure what world you live in if Bargs is a ‘good defender’ or played ‘great defense’ last night.
As always, standing around, not challenging shots, not fouling or getting in front to guys to stop buckets, half assed attempts at blocks…
I know this is a losing battle… stats lie, what we see is inaccurate, everyone else is bad/worse…. as I said before, 7 years of this with Bosh and atleast another 5 years with Bargs.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions
I live on planet earth, kind of a weird place but I do like it. The good thing about it is you only have to be here for a hundred years or so, any longer and it would be torture. One can only put up with the human species for so long.
I don’t know what to say to you. Andrea played really good defense in the 1st half and average defense in the 2nd. Has I said before, yes it would have been great if Andrea could have shut down Amare in the 4th but I’m not going to pretend that is how he played defense the entire game.
so his defense
in the span of 5 minutes changed from great in the first half and good in the 2nd to good in the first half and average in the 2nd…..
… and a players defensive responsibility is not only to his own man. You need to help out your teammates.. not watch the play unfold.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 12:18 PM EST up reply actions
Raps spent 7 years with a offensively gifted talent who did give a lick on D… I don’t want to see another 5 of that.
Whenever I start feeling that way, I fire up league pass and watch some lakers and boston games… We just don’t have that kind of team… Though it’s trying to go in that direction a little bit at least.
I think Raptors’ fans live in a bubble a bit sometimes. I’ve done the same thing axl, even watching a slightly lower caliber team like Utah or New Orleans; watch those guys and then watch the Raptors. They get after it on D.
So this isn’t just about Bargnani, the whole team did a poor job throughout the game of getting stops when they needed them.
However to say that Bargs played great defense last night is ridiculous. Passable, yes, great? Great makes me think KG, Ben Wallace, Rasheed in his prime – lock-down performances. You don’t play “great” defense and allow the man you’re guarding to score 18. Not so friendly hit on a number of “great” attempts by Andrea; ie no hard fouls, half-assed block attempts, etc, etc. There’s a reason D’Antoni ran screen-and-roll after screen-and-roll on Jose and Bargs; they couldn’t stop it.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 12:10 PM EST up reply actions
yes
They get after it and are stocked with players and coaches that built their careers on defense. There are a lot of lesser defensive teams and it’s not that they don’t care, it’s just how those gms build teams, how those coaches, coach and how these players play… to really change a player late seems to me a fairly rare feat.
Then they started double teaming and keying on him...
And he became the worst black hole bad shot chucker in the universe…
On that point – Bargnani’s passing out of the double team was amazing last night.
He just keeps getting better and better.
Shades of Dirk, have to agree with NBA.com guys on that.
Of course he needs to bring that every night, but at least the offence was running through him.
He is a grade A talent, who does not often produce grade A all around grade A games. I think he has gotten much better and is showing signs that he could very well end up being a very valuable player. After having very little success against the Knicks he seemed to spend much more time in the post this game, and the results were great.
I do agree that he would have more assists if he had wings who could score. I know that some people will argue that because of past totals. However, this is the firt chance he is getting as “the number one option”. He should get more looks in the block, early in the shot clock this year than ever before. Hopefully, he can build off his success of distributing last night.
Bargnani has certainly embraced his role as the go to scorer. Although it is not really fair since Bosh was much younger. He is averaging 5 points more than Bosh did in his first season without Vince Carter around.
While Amare does not seem to take as much heat as Bargnani for his terrible defense, he does take some. He would have been much closer to Lebron and Wade in value if he was known to be able to play D. Amare has knocked his own D, his coach has knocked his D. I know all of you think that DStance is only hard on Bargnani, but he has talked several times recently about how bad Amare’s D is.
Amar’e is a terrible defensive player. The biggest differences I can see between Amar’e and Bargnani are:
- Amar’e plays like a beast almost every night… on offence. There are far less jump shots and more attempts close to the basket and dunks. For Bargnani to reproduce what he did last night, he needs his shot to drop. What’s a more effective way to score? The jump shot or a dunk? There’s your answer.
- the Knicks have a coach who doesn’t care about defence in the first place, and
- the Knicks are getting production out of the supporting cast
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 10:01 AM EST up reply actions
Last nights shot selection doesn't bear that out.
http://scores.espn.go.com/nba/shotchart?gameId=301208018
Amare had a lot of shots under the rim but he also had seven offensive rebounds so many rebounds seem to be his own missed shots.
Bargnani scored 7 baskets in the paint, Amare had 6
More than 2/3rds of Bargnani’s shots were inside the elbow. Amare took only 3 shots outside the elbow.
Amare only got to the lin 4 times while Barg’s had 9 ft’s.
Small sample size I know but it looks like Amare is more of a jump shooter than you think and Bargnani has a better presence in the paint than you stated.
by raptor rabid on Dec 9, 2010 10:44 AM EST up reply actions
Bargnani can have a better presence in the paint than most people think. Especially against a team like the Knicks. If Bargs chooses to hit the post on games where he has that advantage on his opposition, he will be truly a killer offensively.
Unfornatley, he posted up only 4 times all game that I could count in their game against the Knicks a few days ago. He scored every time that night, and the pass was thrown away on the 4th.
I know people will argue that Bargs teammates should look for him more down there, but some nights like that game Bargs is just nowhere near the post.
If he figures out how to use his advantages based on his opponents every night and be agressive offensively, he should become at least as good as Bosh was offensively…
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 10:57 AM EST up reply actions
My point was more about the season as a whole and not one game. This season, 81 per cent of Bargnani’s shots are jumpers while Amar’e is in the 64 per cent range. The fact that the shot selection looked a bit different last night can either be chalked up to the fact that it is one game (the small sample size you mentioned) or — more likely — Triano and Bargnani sat down with the game tape from Sunday afternoon and came up with a better strategy for Bargs to attack the basket and be more aggressive.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 11:29 AM EST up reply actions
But don’t forget that NY runs the pick and roll for Amare. He’s gonna see mismatches that allow him to get to the basket against a smaller guard. Toronto has up to this point primarily used Bargnani as a spot up jump shooter.
by raptor rabid on Dec 9, 2010 11:42 AM EST up reply actions
Great point by Raptor rapid – interesting to compare usage rates for the two players but I’m guessing Amar’e’s is higher.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 11:48 AM EST up reply actions
Amar’e USG% = 29.9
Bargs USG% = 27.5 (which is up from 22.3 last season)
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 11:53 AM EST up reply actions
Really interesting usage stats D Stance – both EXTREMELY high…
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 12:11 PM EST up reply actions
Even Amar’e is up year over year; career high, acutally. Have I mentioned how excited I am to have him on my fantasy basketball team? Hahaha.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 12:25 PM EST up reply actions
Bargnani is nowhere near the athlete without the ball that Amare is…He is not going to be able to get open like Amare off a pick or go flying in for alley oops and put back jams.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 11:58 AM EST up reply actions
Absolutely, Amare is a freak
But Okafor is not an Amare type and he and CP3 run it to perfection.
I’m not saying that they should run it for him. I’m just saying that it will change the skewness of any statistical comparison of shot selection.
by raptor rabid on Dec 9, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions
Watching Andrea last night honestly was a thing of beauty.
(Yes, I’m over my flu.)
Just seeing him be aggressive, mix up his offence, hit some Dirk-esque shots – just huge. THAT was the Andrea I was rooting to develop for the past four seasons.
So now that we know he can do it, we need to see it every night, like Amar’e.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 11:47 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
Fun game
Not counting on the Raptors to do anything this year except provide entertainment, so last night’s game was great from my perspective. I would have loved to see Bargnani step it up a little on defense, but on the plus side I was surprised and pleased to see him distributing the ball more on offense. I would be really happy to see that become a habit with Bargs rather than a blip(like his 12 rebound game last week).
I have no expectation for the Nuggets game on Friday. KMart vs. Amir should be a fun match up and Billups has slowed down enough the Jose should be able to stay with him most of the time. Another shootout? I would imagine so.
Yes, good point. It looks like the Sheldon Williams and Nene are Denver’s starting front court right now. For entertainment value I guess we will have to wait for Chris Anderson to come off the bench.
Was wondering the same thing – they’ve got guys like Gary Neale bailing them out!
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 11:49 AM EST up reply actions
Free Julian Wright!
Both Kleiza and Weems have been struggling off and on lately. It is fine to let them play through their struggles for a while, but at some point Wright should get a chance to step in and try to give this team something.
I would to see wright get some burn. IF he could somehow master the corner 3 pointer on offense a la James Posey, i dont think he’d ever leave the court thanks to his hustle Defence.
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 9:52 AM EST up reply actions
Can we unfree Sonny Weems?
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Dec 9, 2010 10:12 AM EST up reply actions
Using him on Melo would be a very good idea.
For all the knocks on Bargnani and Calderon for their D at least their offense is good.
If you average out Julian Wright’s stats to see how many points he would get in 25 minutes, you get 7.3. Let’s round that down to 6 or 7 because he has played in garbage time.
When playing a team with a guy like Melo, I would take 6 points over the 11.16 that Weems averages per 25. Or the 10.39 that DeRozan gets per 25 minutes.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 10:19 AM EST up reply actions
By him I meant Julian Wright.
So DeRozan will get you an extra 4 points.
I would bet that Melo is likely to score 5 less points in the 25 minutes that Julian Wright is on him, than he would with DeRozan on him. Or at least he would force shots like crazy to make up for it, and score much less efficiently.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 10:21 AM EST up reply actions
Anyone else want to walk into their TV last night and shake Kleiza?
He took some HORRIBLE shots, missed some ones my Grandmother would have made, and just doesn’t seem to be playing a “team” game right now. The only thing I liked were a few of his rebounds in traffic.
I didn’t think Sonny was horrific last night – forced a few but overall, just wasn’t aggressive enough attacking the basket considering his skill-set.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 11:50 AM EST up reply actions
OMG
How Kleiza plays over dorsey or davis at pf when amir sits is a travesty.
I do expect Kleiza to improve though… he must be good in practice for JT to play him so much…
Kleiza must light up somethin fierce in practice to be earning all that court time in games…
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 12:28 PM EST up reply actions
Kleiza must light up somethin fierce in practice to be earning all that court time in games…
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
haha true say. He would be a fantastic player if he stuck strictly to the catch and shoot formula
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
I have no problems with him
posting up on occasion… although he needs to work on it a bit. He seems to beat guys in the post and then blow an easy one.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 12:38 PM EST up reply actions
his postups have lacked any skill lately
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 12:40 PM EST up reply actions
“I don’t think the offence should move through Bargnani at all. He hasn’t shown an ability to pass the ball (unless you think 1 assist per game is the sign of a great distributor with superior court vision). Bargs needs to move without the ball, find his spot and get his feet set. If they take away his shot or if the openings present themselves, attack the basket.”
by RaptorsHQ – Defensive Stance on Dec 6, 2010 9:36 AM PST
“Even Flow
Yesterday Andrea DID get the ball in the post. But the majority of the time he turned, faced up, and then made his move.
He might be a "skilled passer." But rarely do you see him actually pass the ball resulting in scoring plays. Neither the stats nor the eye test back it up. He’s averaged less than 2 assists a game, year after year, when he has the highest or near highest usage rate on the team is someone who facilitates motion on offence.
It’s like saying DeRozan’s an excellent 3-point shooter!"
Adam Francis – Publisher – RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ – Franchise on Dec 6, 2010 11:33 AM PST
I feel vindicated. The above are some of the responses to a post I made after the Knicks/Raptors game last week.
I think what this shows us is the writers on the blog, DS especially have no clue what they are talking about.
Andrea had a great game last night, was great on offense and did a good job on defense contrary to what some will say. Would I have liked to see Andrea shut down Amare in the 4th, absolutely but Amare is playing fantastic right now and he hit his jumpers, eventually Andrea will learn to make those stops.
I liked the way Andrea played offense last night, but if I were you I’d wait til he does it a few more times before claiming vindication. Andrea grabbed 12 rebounds not so long ago, but I don’t think he has become a good rebounder just yet. Patience grasshopper….
I would not give him the bad defender stigma either
His D on Amare was as good as anybody else on the team, this story has been blown out of proportions to the point that : he may be not guilty, but with that face, he cannot be totally innocent either..
no one is giving him that stigma
he has earned it.
I want nothing more that for him to prove me wrong… but how long can you keep waiting for a guy to do something he has yet to do.
I’m not waiting up at night for Salma Hayek to call me… and there is a reason for that.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 11:41 AM EST up reply actions
I think the only point I’m trying to make here is that both Franchise and Defensive Stance were wrong with how they think the offensive should be run. I think it is important to point it out because if they are so wrong about how the offense should flow than perhaps they are wrong in regards to the other aspects of the game.
Andrea’s defense is not as bad as some claim on here and i feel like its becoming a strawman for some.
1 game
does not make them wrong.
Its amazing how when Andrea does something right once or twice its as if he has been doing that all along…
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 11:44 AM EST up reply actions
point is he is not a pg
and he does not initiate the game, he needs to be fed the ball to do something with it, and guess what, yesterday the team made a point in giving him the ball early in almost every play of the game, well it paid off. Maybe now they will have another two games like Indiana and the first ny where they forgot about him for long stretches so no, it is not just up to him
The good thing about last night’s performance by Bargnani is that hopefully it will show the other Raptors that if they give the ball to AB he will get it back to them if they are in a good position to score. Teammates need confidence in eachother and if Bargnani performs like that more often then guys are going actually to WANT to give him the ball in the post because they will know if they get themselves open they could be on the receiving end of an assist.
Congrats on feeling vindicated by one game in which he managed to get 6 assists. Ever heard the term “small sample size”?
I’ll continue to comment based on the season as a whole / career performance. And that goes for any player, really.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions
I really wish you would do that but you seem to be the worst offender of jumping on the guy after one game.
by even flow on Dec 9, 2010 11:52 AM EST up reply actions 1 recs
+1
DS, You didn’t say a peep when Bargnani was flourishing for that stretch of 5-6 good games, but it took ONE bad game for you to show your colours.
are you guys joking
such short memories
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions
Ummm, the magical “5-6 game stretch” that got tossed around on this site included 6-17 and 4-13 shooting performances.
I was actually very impressed with Bargnani’s scoring efficiency last night. If that happened during Sunday’s game vs. the Knicks, the Raptors could’ve walked away with a win.
But no, I do not automatically extrapolate 41 points to mean he played well defensively.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
If the offense can run through him successfully more than once, then yes, you may get the right to feel vindicated. Prior to last night’s game though, we hadn’t seen that from Bargs. It comes down to consistency again… do it with frequency and not once in a blue moon and it will be a completely different conversation.
I would argue that outside of one or two games this year the team has ever tried to run the offense through him.
Andrea said last night that Traino called plays to make sure he got the ball in the post. I don’t think any sane person can say that this has been the teams offensive strategy for the season so far.
Sanity check – I’ve talked to Triano about Andrea’s role numerous times in the past. He gets the most attention offensively in terms of play calls, and while it’s not Amare pick-n-rollish, the Raptors know where their bread-and-butter on offense is coming from. Their offensive strategy is ALWAYS to get Andrea going early, which hopefully opens up things for the wings etc. Check my comments above and praise for Bargs – I’m DYING to see him play like this more often.
But as everyone’s noted, this was one game so as fans, again, we’ll have to see what transpires over the next few before being able to establish any certain positive trending.
And really, on a macro level, even with Bargs scoring 41, the team still lost…
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 12:03 PM EST up reply actions
ok, good that Triano said that.
now, can you say they consistently do that?
No – in fact I think it’s taken this long into the season for the players to consistently look at Andrea at all times. So yes renato, it’s one thing for the coach to make that a point, it’s another for his players to then go out and DO IT.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 12:13 PM EST up reply actions
That's the bane of coaches everywhere.
I think thats what makes a great coach. It’s not drawing up x’s and o’s or practice plans or substitutions. It’s about implementing a game plan, communicating it to your players and then getting them to execute.
by raptor rabid on Dec 9, 2010 12:29 PM EST up reply actions
… and benching players (or cutting minutes) of those who don’t execute your game plan.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
+1
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 9, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions
…AND not benching players who are dominating
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
I gotta disagree with you again Stance (nothing personal)
As a coach you have the authority to lead but you don’t necessarily have the players confidence to lead. Benching some guys works, for other guys sitting down and talking is more effective. The problem with benching is where do you go from there? Too often you alienate the guy, do it to too many guys and you alienate the team. What’s the next step?
You need to create loyalty in your team and I find benching divisive.
Too many coaches try to lead without earning their players respect.
by raptor rabid on Dec 9, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
I think you bring up a great point (different approaches to different players). But also, by not benching or cutting the minutes of someone who is negatively impacting your team, you risk alienating the players who are busting their balls as well. There’s a flip side.
But yes, coaches can wear out their welcome with the hard driving approach… particularly “today’s” players.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 1:18 PM EST up reply actions
Imagine Julian Wright and Andrea working together
Given how well Wright passes and plays D. Triano is wasting a real opportunity. PLEASE FRANCHISE I BEG YOU – make the focus of a Traino question period a discussion on the merits and detriments of Julian Wright and why he doesn’t feel it necessary to play him. Planting the seed might force the light switch on. A YOUNG player who is not being offered an opportunity is a travesty. Is it practice habits? Because Triano has stated publicly that Davis has not learned to practice well yet so I don’t get it.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
by HQ Interloper on Dec 9, 2010 12:52 PM EST up reply actions
I would love to know why wright’s nailed so hard to the pine, yet kleiza is free to terrorize the negative boxscore stats
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 1:43 PM EST up reply actions
in all fairness....
I’m not drinkinking the Bargs Kool Aid,but how many games did Bosh score 40+ & we didn’t win?
You have to admit the ball doesn’t stick to Barg’s hands as much,his assists would of been up if a few of his teammates could make a shot.
One player does not make a team.
Bargs is a far cry from a “franshise player”
But at this point of the game he is our best player,not even close.
amare vs bargs
biggest difference= 50 million $$$$$$
bargnani’s value is probably through the roof right now because of his 10 mil a year deal. I bet we could get a real center for him
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions
Fair and Balanced on #7
I think I’m considered to be in the pro-Andrea camp. Something I’d like to see Andrea work on a bit is a particular aspect of his rebounding: there are simply too many times when he’s the first guy to get his hand(s) on the ball, but it ultimately ends up in the hands of the other team. I don’t know if it’s a question of his hands not being as physically strong as other bigs, or whether it’s simply a mental/attitude/emotional thing. But I’d like to see that part of his game improve, and I think it’s something that a good coaching staff would address.
As well as his pick and roll defense. The coaches need to sit down with him and go over the game tape. He has the ability and skill to be good on the defensive end, this is the one area where I want to see improvement the most.
I have noticed though that he is grabbing the rebounds with more energy this year. He may let a few get away but there is a marked improvement over years past.
Those are two defensive areas where I could actually see him improving. Things like defensive awareness, you either have it(like EDavis) or you can learn it (like Amir) or you are just never going to really completely get it(most likely Bargs situation). Grabbing rebounds with more authority and making the right decisions on P-n-R defense are things that the coaches should be able to drill into your head given enough repetitions. You can do drills for those things, etc…
People hating on Bargnani
Everyone’s talking about how he could’ve done more on Defence, and while that may be true, someone go check out Raptors Republic’s analysis of the game. I agree completely that you’re not helping Bargnani AT ALL by playing KLEIZA as his front court mate. Seriously? Does no one else see this? What is he supposed to do when there is NO legitimate defensive presence on the court…
so then the question is
why can’t the guy playing the most minutes and playing the most important defensive position be expected to be that guy?
Why is playing bad D acceptable because the guy beside you is to?
Why does everyone else have to be responsible for what Bargs does wrong?
At what point in time can Bargs be responsible for himself?
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions
responsible for himself
I’ll take that opinion with a grain of salt…..what is driving me crazy,is that a lot of comments are suggesting the Amare vs Bargs comparisons in the game..shot selection blah,blah…How was the 100 million dollar franchise players defence?
I truly feel that we need and alway have needed a welcoming commitee in the key ,a big bruising intimidating shot blocker…so that the help will know in advance the ball will be going to a wing for a three.
We havent had a mean sob (Evans excluded) since the days of Davis and Oakley.
Nice to see Davis change shots,but he needs to beaf up and park guys on their butts.
F….Michael Jordon $#@#$
amare vs bargs is
a pointless debate.
first off Amare is not a raptor
secondly they won the game
third a players contract should not dictate how hard they play.. I don’t care if a guy is getting paid 1 dollar or 100 mil. You either have a contract to earn, to live up to… or at the very least a team to play for.
thats why you don’t see me invloved in that. Whether Amare’s defense is crap or not I could care less. No matter how bad another player is/isn’t (especially on another team) will still never justify Bargs playing bad on D.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 1:25 PM EST up reply actions
I really wonder where this team would be if tyson chandler would have been had. But then again we would have given up calderon, kept JJ, and not have gotten bayless. Chandlers presence in the key would have been interesting on the raptors tho!
by untouchable_21 on Dec 9, 2010 1:38 PM EST up reply actions
Bad D isn't acceptable, that's not what I'm saying
But if it’s not working, don’t you need to change things up? Are you suggesting that you keep that pairing together? And of those two, who would you rather have on the court – Bargs or Kleiza. If it’s Bargs, then don’t you pair him with a more competent post defender espescially when you consider his defensive deficiencies. I’m not saying it’s ok for him to be that way, I’m just saying he is what he is, and it’d be great for the team if you had Bargs’ offence and someone else’s defence.
The Kleiza-Bargnani frontcourt is the new Jack-Calderon-Turkoglu triangle of death. Obviously, you extracted Calderon from the latter and he has played well since the trades. In a similar fashion, you get more out of Bargnani pairing him with a Reggie Evans or an Amir Johnson. Kleiza is horrible.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 12:42 PM EST up reply actions
Was about to chime in along the same lines “Not So Friendly.”
The Bargs vs. Amar’e debate is pretty pointless. The real key to notsofriendly’s point is that some of us would like to see Andrea become more accountable at that end. I mean, Andrea had ZERO fouls last night. I’m not saying fouls mean someone is trying hard on D, but if you’re the center, and last line of defense, in a game like last night’s I personally want to see a little more lumber being laid on guys coming into the paint. And to me that falls on Andrea.
BUT
I also agree that the Raptors aren’t doing themselves any favours by pairing him with Kleiza etc. I was banging my head watching him out there because it would have been one thing if he was scoring. Then maybe he’s cancelling out some of his bad possessions on D. But that hasn’t been the case since essentially the pre-season!
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
I have invented a new scoring system that projects true player value for abnormal players with unique skils sets and major defficiencies in their game. It is called the StanceNato system. It is found by taking Defensive Stances value of a player adding it to Renato’s value of a player and dividing by 2. Although this system is not perfect it works beautifully for Andrea Bargnani, and probably for Dirk Nowitzki who is really jipped by wins produced…
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 12:21 PM EST reply actions 1 recs
LMAO
That’s gets my vote for the best comment of the day.
by raptor rabid on Dec 9, 2010 12:32 PM EST up reply actions
Awesome.
Do I get some kind of kickback for this system?
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions
I will consider a kickback for a fantasy player to be named later…by me of course.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 1:49 PM EST up reply actions
Since 1996 (the year the Toronto Raptors entered the league) only seven 7 Footers have averaged 20.0 Points Per Game (David Robinson, Dirk Nowitzki, Hakeem Olajuwon, Patrick Ewing, Pau Gasol, Shaquille O’Neal and Yao Ming). All of these players have been to multiple All-Star games.
Dirk Nowitzki in 2009 had a WP48 of 0.129. The lowest mark by a 7 Foot 20 PPG player.
This has been taken from somebody else’s article, found here:
Dirk’s WP48 is not all that good is it? The guy is great.
His game is similar to Bargnani’s. better but similar. Neither guy can be measured properly based on a formula.
Bargs get a 90 as an offensive guy. He gets a 50 as a defensive guy, because he does not help and does not rebound. Bingo Bargnani is currently a 70 (B-) with lots of room to improve.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 12:28 PM EST reply actions
But before we dive fully into the Bargs-Dirk comparisons, let’s recognize that there is a massive difference in the WP48 for both players. Dirk’s lowest score is still well above average and Bargnani’s is heavily into negative territory. And I think most people would agree that Dirk has been a bit more consistent offensively, his teams have won more, etc. So there is a difference in what each player is contributing on the court and to overall team success.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 12:39 PM EST up reply actions
Bargs gets "whoah boy" player of the night from The Basketball Jones
http://blogs.thescore.com/tbj/2010/12/09/ep-625-joined-in-progress/
Check the 17 minute mark.
However TBJ points out the same thing we keep saying…this needs to happen on a regular basis…
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
Quick start to the count
Anyone replay that 5 second count? They didn’t show the replay on TV, no, they were too busy queing up the next highlight to show during live game action. But if you rewond your PVR, you can clearly see the ref starting his 5 count before the ball gets to Kleiza. In fact, when Kleize gets the ball, he’s already at 1.
Blatant!
Here’s my question.. if Andrea was a 7th round pick instead of 1st overall, would there still be this pro/anti stance?
As I keep saying.. it’s time to move on. He’s a guy with specialized skill who if used properly provides value. He will never be a perfect player, and nor do I expect him to be. The “stigma” is because he was a #1 overall. I still much prefer him over Adam Morrison.
If we look back I think now we can say he’s arguably (notice the word arguable) more valuable than: LaMarcus Aldridge, Tyrus Thomas, Shelden Williams, Randy Foye, Patrick O’Bryant.
If we were drafting AB at 7th overall, he would have been a steal, and this town would have loved him.
there should be no relevance to where he was drafted. whether 1st or last.. or undrafted. I don’t know why people still bring this up, its 5 years removed.
If he was the 7th overrall pick he would still be who he is….
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 2:36 PM EST up reply actions
I’d say people would have different expectations. The fact that there is such a strong pro/hater divide IMO is because of where he was drafted.
We don’t see people critiquing Reggie Evans as harshly for for inept offensive capabilities. We praise him for the Defense.
We don’t see the same level of harshness for Sonny Weems, I’d argue as poorly as anyone in a Raps Jersey has ever played in its history in a 10 game period in a starting capacity not named Hoffa.
Same goes for Amir Johnson. If we switched AJ for AB’s name would the harshness be the same (pro or against).
Expectations
This is a great question Ustation, and I think I need to drop a full blog post on it because you’re touching on something important here. Because the team has invested so much in Andrea (and I’m talking personnel moves etc), it’s hard not to discuss him without having some bias to that fact.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
Can you elaborate on that?
besides maybe Maurizio, who can be, however an NBA manager by his own merits, I do not remember any move centered around Andrea. Everything has been always about Chris Bosh.
I keep thinkin don't get sucked into the Bargs debate but
I can’t seem to stay back and its because of the unfairness. Those that continue to trash Bargs have developed this unique way to always dismiss offense and high lite these un measurable quanities like defense, and consistancy.
He must be the only center playing in the nba expected to produce these biased expected results every night. So then they say “no not every night but he has to be more consistant” but by who’s measure? Its just up to Ds, or Mas or Franchise to arbitrarily declare what is “consistent”. Show me one good player in the league that is good at every aspect of the game every night. For that matter show me a superstar who can’t improve in some area.
The other thing is that they seem to have the licence to declare his scoring as marginally important. Here’s a guy that scored 41 points last night, how many players in the nba will score 40 this year, or 30 for that matter.
I must not be watching the same games. I see him help on defense, I see him sprinting back, I see him block shots. He’s an average defender but who cares, he’s got a gift that few 7 footers have and thats the ability to put the ball in the hoop.
This criticism of Bargs is so obviously biased by some type of personal dislike, it is just crazy.
consistency and defense
are unmeasurable? I think not…. (but ofcourse if they are how do you measure him as an “average defender”?)
and no one is dismissing his capacity for offense… no one. Not last game, nor in the future. We all know he can score.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 2:41 PM EST up reply actions
Was going to say the same thing. Consistency is COMPLETELY measurable.
And that’s what makes Andrea such a hot button topic frankly, because we SEE these flashes.
Hoffa was a pretty high pick too, yet he never garnered near the amount of discussion because he just didn’t produce…period.
Andrea has, and it’s that consistency many of us are waiting for.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
A simple On Court/Off Court measurement over at 82games.com gives the edge to Weems over Bargnani for the title of worst defender, if we’re just counting on-court production (although the net rating is unfavourable towards Bargs).
Or how about Defensive Rating from Basketball-Reference.com? Once again Weems appears to trail both Bargnani and Calderon.
Of the three, I think Weems has played far worse… especially lately. So it makes sense to say he’s the “winner”.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 3:09 PM EST up reply actions
BING! You are correct my friend. I pointed that out last night as well to most people’s astonishment.
Definitely a case of the stats supporting what you see on the floor. I mean, you can’t continuously fail to go over screens and let the opposing team rain threes on you without some statistical consequences, right?
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 3:33 PM EST up reply actions
Weems
I’m a Weems fan but he’s been abysmal of late. Last night I watched Landry Fields burn him on a couple of occasions and overall, he’s just not done a good job guarding his position.
I could see how maybe other 3’s were using size or some other advantage to get the best of him but Landry Fields? Good player but hardly someone who should be giving him that much trouble.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
Grange on Bargnani
No lunchbox links today, but here is an article by Grange in today’s G&M. It will read like sweet music for the Bargnani fans and nails on a chalkboard for the haters:
http://www.theglobeandmail.com/sports/first-up/bargs-the-best-no1-pick-money-can-buy/article1831494/
I hadn’t read the article, but I was just talking about this last night with some folks watching the game. I said the AB contract is now a steal, which prompted people to throw things at me.
Great read by Grange although not sure it really addresses some of our concerns with Andrea.
Is he looking more and more like one of the best options from that horrid draft class?
Indeed.
And if he continues to play like last night, is his contract suddenly a great value?
I’d have to say yes.
But does that mean he’s:
a) A franchise player who can carry a team?
b) Not capable of exerting more effort defensively and on the glass?
c) Going to be a consistent first option night in and night out on winning team?
These we’ll have to wait and see about…
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
Stop associating AB with being a “Franchise Player”
He’s not expected to be or PAID to be a Franchise Player. This Franchise type player discussion ONLY happens in Toronto.
At his salary he’s PAID to be a : Ben Gordon, Josh Smith, Al Horford, Joakim Noah, Troy Murphy, Luis Scola, Gerald Wallace, Turkeyglu.
Heck he’s not even paid to be a David Lee, Emke Okafor, Luol Deng, Baron Davis or Elton Brand.
So STOP calling him a #1 a Franchise savior type player. No one’s paying him to be. He just happened to be drafted in that position.
He may not be paid like a franchise player, but to a certain degree he has been marketed like a franchise player by MLSE & their broadcast team. I agree that actions(ie dollars) speak louder than words(ie hype), but nonetheless you have to take into account how he is being sold to the public in judging fans’ perceptions of him.
I think there’s been more marketing of the young gunz than ab… And I think there was a reason for that.
by Ustation on Dec 9, 2010 6:33 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
he is getting
franchise player minutes, respect, touches and responsibility…. who cares about the size of his paycheque.
There are ton of guys out there not making max dollars who I’m sure the team considers them franchise guys, others who are making max or near and are sitting on the bench.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 9, 2010 11:36 PM EST up reply actions
The most polarizing man in the history of this Franchise
Seriously, the Andrea back and forth has reached epic proportions. While some of its fun to read, and I myself have partaken in it on more than one occassion, I feel like the positions on him are so extreme that a realistic view of him is getting harder to grasp.
But let me try:
Offensively he’s the most talented on the team and should be the guy that the offensive runs through because he is the only one that can consistently draw a double team.
The passing last night was a revelation, and if he can continue to draw doubles and pass it like that, we will be a much better team in the long run. Until last night, I didn’t think he had that in him. I hope to see alot more of it.
I think he gets into trouble on offense sometimes because he can do so many things. He reminds me of a pitcher that has 4 great pitches but can’t get any of them over for strikes on a consistent basis. If you can’t throw strikes, it doesn’t matter how good your stuff is.
Andrea has some stage presence, which is something most (Bosh included) don’t have. You could actually hear a collective gasp from the crowd when Andrea lined up for that 3 in the 4th last night. He’s just one of those players, that when he gets going, you get the feeling that he’s not going to miss. That’s a star quality.
Defensively, Andrea still isn’t good; but I’ve seen improvement. He’s moving his feet better and more consistently this year than in previous years, but his reaction times on the help side are still poor. If he was a 1 out of 10 last year, I’d say he’s been about a 3 this year; not good, but better.
Last night, while the pick and roll D wasn’t good, that’s as much Calderon’s fault as Andrea’s. What was really bugging me was the elbow jumpers that Amare was nailing. Simply put, Andrea didn’t keep his hand up to contest the shot. Every time he dropped it, Amare took the shot. I don’t know if you chalk that up to laziness or fatigue from carrying the team for 4 quarters, but that was the weakest part of his D last night if you ask me.
Finally, and I think this should not be lost sight of, Andrea’s made strides with consistency this year, which is probably all we can ask for as fans. We aren’t getting “Good Andrea” for 1 out of every five games or for 1 quarter of a game. He’s had his off nights, but for the most part since the Washington game, the effort’s been there.
The passing last night was a revelation, and if he can continue to draw doubles and pass it like that, we will be a much better team in the long run. Until last night, I didn’t think he had that in him. I hope to see alot more of it.
If last night was some sort of watershed moment, and Bargnani averages 4-5 assists per game for the remainder of the season, we’re talking about a different player. I’m completely on board with the idea of running the offence through a big man who averages 4-5 assists per game. But up until this point, Bargs typically falls in the 0-2 assists per game range.
So was last night an outlier? The next couple of games will certainly be interesting.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 2:59 PM EST up reply actions
The order of fault finding is:
He needs to score, if he scores, well he should have rebounded better. If he rebounds and scores, did he get enough assists. If he scores, rebounds and passes well, then was his +/- up there. And if all was good including the +/- then what about his “help defense”. And if all else fails, it’s “well he had a decent game this time but he needs to be consistant”.
I can’t wait till he meets all these great expectations, he’ll be changing in a phone booth at mid court and leaping buildings in a single bound.
Do you have any experience with Visio? Can we get this in some sort of flow chart? Thanks, man!
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 9, 2010 3:36 PM EST up reply actions
diffrent topic
but word today is kyrie irving might be done for the rest of the season with a serious toe injury..maybe his stock with drop cause of this and we’ll get our point guard.
for real
And the way the reports were saying online his injury is very serious. They aint gonna rush him back anytime soon but he’s most likely done for the year.
by sherwin316 on Dec 9, 2010 6:39 PM EST via mobile up reply actions
he would probably just go back for an extra year then, no?
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 9, 2010 7:21 PM EST up reply actions
andrea is the best offensive big man in the NBA hands down
by raptors_run_the_show on Dec 9, 2010 7:25 PM EST reply actions
are u crazy or what are u smoking
Andrea LMAO Yeah right since when , he’s garbage and his smell keep getting worst , but sometime u can deal with it , but others times u jus look at him and say , Com on Man , Your a 1 round pick , thee First round pick and u still dont get it .
And Jose is jus Garbage two , why have this guy in the game at that point , why , he can’;t guard or get rebounds, and he doesn’t get fouled unless its seconds on the clock , WHY WHY WHY
Triano needs to be fired , but jus like Canada’s national team Coach it Jus doesn’t Matter
by Real raptors fan on Dec 9, 2010 8:02 PM EST up reply actions
Bargnani - Great all around game (and that includes defense)
bargnani’s value is probably through the roof right now because of his 10 mil a year deal. I bet we could get a real center for him
Bargs is actually making 8.5 million, and Amare is making twice that, but who`s counting.
“Money is not the most important thing in the world. Love is. Fortunately, I love money.” – Jackie Mason
I’m still trying to understand certain fans out there, who see think our greatest weakness is a real Centre, and that Bargs is counterproductive to a winning team. One thing is for sure, Andrea ain`t inviting Dave Berri over for lasagna.
The short of it is, some fans – while never admitting it, as it would affect their Bias standing – would simply be overjoyed if the 7 foot Italian was traded. Of course, incidental to all that, is this “magically delicious” idea that teams are just dying to give us a real Centre.
.
Being away recently – and disconnected from the last couple of games – I finally got a chance to watch the New York game (via PVR – a great invention). Prior to this, my only connection to this match-up was thru:
http://www.raptorshq.com/2010/12/8/1864810/game-day-thread-toronto-raptors-vs-new-york-knicks.
And if I didn’t know better, I would’ve thought Bargs was having one of his worst nights on the Defensive end – and despite good scoring, was a negative. And not just in the +/- category. I guess that’s why I look at stats as having a subjective quality – and how one sees the numbers. Something to be said for actually watching the game.
.
With this game, I eventually came to the conclusion that this was more a Raptor loss than a Knick win. Despite it being so – technically. Rookie Inexperience mistakes, and Kleiza + Barbosa veterans not being veteran enough were part of the reasons for missing a win. 6-18 will not cut it when playing a team that is currently in the zone.
.
That said, it’s games like these that are an ideal way to illustrate Raptor needs. For the most part, Bench is not one of them (Centre excluded). Starters could sure use a younger Barbosa clone, but one with that .475 average from a few years back. Hopefully a little more Ed. And some Alabi. Why not? – Where we going. We need to test our strengths this year – not next. These games will help us refine those needs. And once the season is final, Raps can then focus on finding a jewel & diamond in the rough. We have 2 shots at both those items, so who knows. Hopefully the search includes a PG / Centre / SF – in that order.
.




























