Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Blake Griffin Slam Dunks: NBA Jam Style

Tip-In: Giving it Away - Turnovers Kill Raptors in 96 to 85 Loss to Grizzlies


In what may have been their most "winnable" game on this mini-road trip, the Toronto Raptors gave the Memphis Grizzlies more than enough chances to eventually walk away with the win...

Star-divide

The Toronto Raptors under Bryan Colangelo have never been a great defensive team.

They've also always had a bit of a "soft" label.

However they have held several positive traits that have remained consistent over this same time period as well, things like excelling as a free-throw shooting club.

Maybe their best trait though has been their ability to maintain possessions via lack of turnovers.  It's not a glamorous trait, but an important one nonetheless, and I think this season has illustrated just how valuable it is not to give an opposing team "free opportunities."

Especially when you're a basketball team that is possibly the worst defensive unit in the league, are missing key players, and have a sporadic offence to begin with.

Last night, in a 96 to 85 loss to the Memphis Grizzlies, turnovers, a problem for the Raptors of late, were the may issue yet again.  Toronto coughed it up a season-high 25 times, and the Grizzlies simply put, took advantage.

A 12 point Raptors lead early in the game therefore slowly turned into a 4 point deficit at half, and by the time this was over, the Grizz has scored 27 off those 25 turnovers, and the Dinos were waving the white flag.  Toronto's defense, especially on the perimeter, was horrendous as always, but it really was the turnover issue that put the early nails in the coffin, and Memphis never looked back after half.

So what's going on with the turnover situation?

Is this simply a matter of Jose Calderon, who turned it over an uncharacteristically high 4 times, forcing the issue? He's played much more aggressively this year, so is this new style the reason?

Is it a product of the personnel overall?  Does this team simply have bad decision makers this year?

Personally I don't think it's either, although watching last night you could make a case for the latter to a certain extent.  Players like Barbosa, Bayless and DeRozan force the issue at times (each had 3 TO's last night), but I think the obvious issue is a lack of cohesion on this team thanks to injuries.  No Bargnani last night, the team's center-piece offensively, no Weems, one of the few Raptors who can create when the clock is winding down, and even Reggie Evans' passing in the paint has been missed.  Now players are outside of their roles to a certain extent, and as a whole, the club just doesn't seem comfortable on O.

Toronto still shot 50% from the field...but when you keep giving your opponent, a more talented one at that, more opportunities at the hoop, and don't exactly excel in getting stops...

...yep, you get losses like last night.

This of course doesn't bode well for tonight's match against the Mavericks, and in that sense I'm not sure "3 Keys" is really warranted.  There's one here, and that's to take care of the ball.  You simply can't expect a virtuoso performance on D, or a juggernaut offensive attack minus certain players, so for this one to even be close, the Raps need to maximize possessions.

Bright spots from last night?

Once again, not too many.

Linas Kleiza would be my top pick as he dropped in a team-high 22 points on 10 of 16 shooting.  He dominated Rudy Gay early in halfcourt sets, but as the game turned into a loose, run-and-gun affair, Gay was able to play to his strengths and Kleiza wasn't nearly as effective.

I also like the play of Joey Dorsey.

Yes, he got abused in the second half by Zach Randolph (who scored 21 for the Grizz), but I thought he did a decent job considering this is someone you probably want as a 9th man on a good team.  He finished with only 6 points but had 13 rebounds, by far tops on Toronto.

Outside of that...well...some might say DeMar DeRozan; a few nice takes and 18 points on 7 of 13 shooting.

But he was only 4 of 8 from the line, terrible on D, looked uncertain on O (hence the turnover story above) and again to me, he just didn't display anything last night that made me think: "ok, this kid is going to be unstoppable in a year from now."

Again, it's hard to criticize one of the only Raptors last night who put forth a solid offensive performance, but the fact is that if Toronto is going to start winning games and developing into a better team, DeRozan HAS to be one of the players leading the charge, and as such, the spotlight shines brighter on him.

DeRozan has his work cut out for him tonight against guys like Caron Butler and Jason Terry, as does the whole Raptors' squad, and I'd be lying if I said I expected this one to be close.  Dallas is perhaps the best team in the league at present, and Toronto, well, not so much.

However this season as a reminder is all about growth towards the future so again, I'll be ok with a loss provided we see some individual and team progress in the right direction.

Admittedly though, minus some of the players expected to help spur on this growth, it's a tough proposition.

Comment 51 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Let's cut to the chase

There are a number of you who always focus the discussion here on defense. So if it is the number one primary problem with the Raps, then lets look at it. The truth can only be one of two conclusions; the Raptor players either can’t physically play defense or will not play defense. If they cannot player defense because they are some how too slow or too weak then they should be traded away. If they refuse to play defense then it indicates that the coach or the players or both should go.
The other possibility is that the coaches are too stupid to teach it or the players are too stupid to learn it. This possibility pisses me off the most because it is not that complicated. On top of that is that these guys have been playing basket ball for years under some pretty impressive name coaches and still they don’t get it. So I can not accept that they are young and we need to be patient until they learn the defense because I really don’t think they are that stupid.
Last year they had a assistant coach (whos name I can’t spell) was supposed to be a defensive expert and that prooved to be a wash. Now this year, Carlissimo is there and he was supposed to be the second coming Christ but still people are whining about defense.
Some people say and rightfully so that defense is really about desire and effort. Then one must conclude that the Raptor team players do not have the desire or effort. Either motivate them or get rid of them.
Now when you say that Derozen has to be one of those players leading the charge, I assume you’re talking defensively as that is what you and your buddies at HQ always seem to talk about. Why would he suddenly become a much better player on defense? What would suddenly change?
As you know by now , I don’t agree that defense is the “be all end all” but for arguement’s sake lets hear your answers

by raptball on Dec 28, 2010 10:32 AM EST reply actions  

Here’s a good place to start, if you want to talk offence vs. defence. It seems pretty clear that offence takes a backseat to defence, in terms of playoff success and championships.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 11:09 AM EST up reply actions  

Not that I disagree with you

but you need to get there first, moreover the game is still about scoring one more than the opponent. I know you will point out the Phoenix never won a title, although there were “external factors at play” and they could not overcome them AND the opponent. It also seems that method produces also without Nash….

by renato on Dec 28, 2010 11:14 AM EST up reply actions  

Agreed about the Phoenix thing. There were other circumstances at play that prevented them from winning a championship (cheap owner, injuries, playoff suspensions, etc).

The game IS about scoring one more than the opponent… but when you are able to prevent your opponent from scoring – instead of playing matador defence like the current Raptors squad – you’re far more likely to end up on the winning side of the scoreboard.

I think there’s a case for balanced teams that excel in both aspects of the game, really. But more of the successful teams seem to be good defensively.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 11:30 AM EST up reply actions  

on the other way

it is unfair judging the raps as they are now, missing 4 players, arguably three starters. Not that winning is necessarily, at this stage, the most important thing but I believe with a healthy Andrea, Evans and Peja we could have defended yesterday opponent and shoot them out of the building.

by renato on Dec 28, 2010 11:46 AM EST up reply actions  

That's a general statement meaning nothing

Since you are not allone in your position that defense is every thing, what is the actions needed with this team. Obviously,I’m sure you advocate getting rid of Bargnani but who else. What of the coaching?

by raptball on Dec 28, 2010 12:16 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s a general statement meaning nothing

Did you actually click on the link and read the column?

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 7:50 PM EST up reply actions  

Even if Dirk can’t go our team is probably in for a beating…

DeRozan looked alright to me last night. I do not see a super star in the making, but if he continues to work hard, he should be able to carve out a nice role for himself in this league.

Bayless and Calderon both look like good back ups to me. Calderon is untradable for anything of value given his contract. However, his leadership and outstanding personality make a him good guy to have around while we stock up on youngsters…

I would like to see Barbosa dealt for prospects and/or picks. Same goes for Reggie Evans.

Depending on what happens with the collective bargaining agreement, I would not be shocked to see Barbosa opt out of the final year of his contract this offseason. He could look for a longer deal with another team that has a better chance of competing now.

I am starting to like Kleiza as a future bench option. He has his strenghts. I am no longer bullish on trying to trade him.

I have soured on Weems. He is really going to have to step up his game if he wants to show that he should be brought back next year.

Dorsey would never play big minutes on a good team, but he has shown enough that I hope he sticks around for a couple of years as an end of the bench type.

by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 28, 2010 11:07 AM EST reply actions  

Defense was not the problem, Bargnani was the problem.

For Raptors to win somewhere an average of 25PPG (Andreas contribution to 10 wins) has to be made up by the collective team. A total of 85/95 pts will lose everytime.
All of the experts who express the opinion that the Rap’s do better with AB off the floor than on it must be very happy now.

The Grizz only scored 96 poinjts vs Rap’s avg PAG of 105pts, even though the Rap’s offense gifted them 25 turnovers for 28pts. The Grizz made 21 turnovers also but the Rap’s only scored 18pts off, reason 1.

The Rap’s bench, such as it was was outscored 34-22 by the Grizz, reason 2.

Bayless with only 1 assist, and with Barbosa 1/11 from 3pts and Amir with zero points all failing to contribute, was reason 3.

The Free throw discrepancy of 28 to 14 FTA’s for the Grizz and 23 to 5 FGM is reason 4.

It’s a testament to the effort by Kleiza, DeRozan, Dorsey, and Calderon to compete that the Raptors were within 6 in the 4th, and only lost by 11pts, as the starters out scored the Grizz starters even without Amir contributing.

Prediction for the trip 0-3, and untill Bargnani is back lickely 0 for until.

by Johnn19 on Dec 28, 2010 11:40 AM EST reply actions  

Here’s my thoughts on how Bargnani would’ve influenced the outcome of last night’s game:

- The Raptors would’ve scored more points… but they would’ve given up more points as well.
- Bargnani puts Dorsey on the bench, which doesn’t do much to increase the bench scoring.
- Bargnani doesn’t get to the line often, so he would’ve had little impact on the free throw numbers.
- He’d have absolutely no impact on the turnovers, which were a HUGE issue last night.

The Raptors are probably going 0-3 on this trip with or without Bargs.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 12:00 PM EST up reply actions  

typical......

The guy doesn’t even play and you still have a go…… Do you suffer from some weird inferiority complex? Cannot cope with someone being better then you, or paid more. Have never seen such one-tracked behaviour

by Canuck Exile on Dec 28, 2010 12:21 PM EST up reply actions  

I don’t think what D Stance said is a slight on Andrea here folks – the reality is, the problems with last night’s win, were as D Stance pointed out, were not ones easily overcome by the inclusion of Bargs. You give the other team 25 more opportunities to score, and it becomes very hard to win, regardless of if you have Andrea Bargnani, or Michael Jordan.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 28, 2010 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Yep. That wasn’t a slight on Bargs at all. Most of what hurt the Raptors vs. the Grizzlies would not have been remedied by Bargs. Not sure how that got lost on our friend Canuck Exile?

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 7:53 PM EST up reply actions  

Well let me see…… if I were to statistically analyse your previous posts (i.e. form), which is one of your favourite things to do, it would be pretty clear and unambiguous that you tend to the OTT when discussing Bargs – is this a slight? No this is based on your history of performance. you know your bias to bash. Feeling damned by the same statistics that you love so much?

Looking at your post above there is no proof they would have given up more points, nor that they wouldn’t have more free throws nor that turnovers wouldn’t have been less. At the end of the day it is a TEAM game and his presence – even if not all provided by him – may be better with him….

by Canuck Exile on Dec 29, 2010 1:55 AM EST up reply actions  

Well, the Raptors give up more points per 100 possessions with Bargnani on the floor – that’s a simple fact. So to make a statement that the Raptors probably would’ve given up more points with Bargnani playing is not exactly a reach.

Also, a player who gets to the line 4 or 5 times per game isn’t going to have a huge impact on poor free-throw shooting by the rest of the team. Again, not much a reach to make that statement either.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 29, 2010 10:06 AM EST up reply actions  

Foundamental disagreement

- he would have attracted doubles and let other player score out of either a pass or by virtue of the having more space
- he would have had an impact on the turnovers as well by virtue of:
            - having the ball more and less in the hands of those turnover machines
            - playing with Andrea, also for the other means playing within a system
            - the other having more space would have meant less “risky” pass lines.

one thing I have noticed of you (quite typical of people who use statistics I must say, also from my professional experience) you seem to use the past (represented by the STATIC set of your KPIs measured by statistics) to foresee the future, which is somewhat an flowed approach in sport as it does not take into account personal improvement (for a team, especially now, made of quasi beginners in their roles, this approach can go totally bananas, one way or the other) and the correlation between presence of any given player and the effect it has on the others, which is not measured, at all, in any of the KPIs (points, steals, etc) you have been bringing up till now, but that it becomes clear by…watching the game and see the raps being more effective, let’s say, with Andrea in rather than out.

Looking at the raps, this season, they have never managed to gain any kind of momentum as a group as they have been constantly to re invent themselves due to injuries. Possibly this team could have performed like last year’s and it still this possible it will gain some momentum in the second half of the season (banning trades/other injuries, etc) which could mean a bad season leading to a low pick, which is and unpleasant situation to be in (similar to the season after the JO trade)

by renato on Dec 28, 2010 12:34 PM EST up reply actions  

It is safe to say that no matter where a person stands on Bargnani, everyone out there surely thinks of him as one of the 10 best/most valuable Raptors on the current team? Is there anybody out there that would put him out of the top 8?

I know that wins-produced show something different, but they need to be taken with a grain of salt. Whether Bargnani is the most valuable or the 8th most valuable, the team is worse off when he does not play at all. The team then needs to play guys that really only warrant minutes in an NBA game in emergency situations, and as a result are worse off.

I would be all for playing Bargs 30 minutes a night to keep him fresh and motivated (yanking him out of games often, but of course getting him back in). The reality is, he is not as good as many would like him to be, but he is one of our best and most valuable players now. I definitely get the argument that he would be best used as a 6th man on a great team, but it is irrelevant right now since the team is not even good yet. Whether he starts or comes off the bench, this team still is better off with Bargnani playing significant minutes.

by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 28, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

And a reminder about the “turnover machines.” We’re talking about several players like Calderon, who don’t have histories of putting up big turnover numbers, so I’m not sure it’s a safe assumption that the ball in someone else’s hands fixes things.

In fact…guess who averages the most turnovers per game on this club…

Yep…Andrea.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 28, 2010 4:07 PM EST up reply actions  

Yes he does

Bargnani averages 2.7 turnovers per game. He also averages:

  • 7 more shots (per game) than the next guy.
  • Gets more double teams than anyone else.
  • Plays the most minutes.

On a per 48 – which doesn’t take into account that more minutes means more fatigue – he’s pretty much on par with Bayless, Kleiza, and Calderon. Dorsey, by the way, is slightly higher.
.
December Turnover Stats – per 48 – playing 20 minutes or more

  1. Johnson
  2. Derozan
  3. Barbosa
  4. Bargnani
  5. Bayless
  6. Kleiza
  7. Weems
  8. Calderon

One other thing. Over the past few years, Calderon is tracking statistically higher than Bargnani, when it comes to turnovers. That being said, he also handles the ball more, so I understand why …. for those who think I can’t argue with myself.
.

by RapthoseLeafs on Dec 28, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's My Thoughts

The Raptors would’ve scored more points… but they would’ve given up more points as well.

Let’s say your right. Andrea adds 10 more points to the Aggregate, while allowing 5 more against us, but we still lose 101 – 95. Unfortunately (or fortunately for Raptors), I don’t see the number of turnovers happening (25) – even though this is Memphis (+2.3 in TO).

Andrea does average 2.7 turnovers per game, however, with the Offense having no “Go To” guy, Toronto’s turnovers ballooned to 25 …. 10 above their average. Grizzlies scored quite a few points off these mistakes – many unforced. In essence, I believe we would’ve won, with a little more stability on the Front end.

Bargnani puts Dorsey on the bench, which doesn’t do much to increase the bench scoring.

Actually, I thought Dorsey played pretty decent (for a guy who was on a fence that could have tipped in any direction). He was +1 for those Stat people who hate this stat, but seem to use it when it works for them. Never-the-less, Joey should not be our Starting Centre. NOT as in NEVER.

Bargnani doesn’t get to the line often, so he would’ve had little impact on the free throw numbers.

We can agree, that Raps were horrible in the Paint against Memphis. That being said, Andrea is our #1 guy getting to the Free throw line (actually, tied with Demar in attempts, but better on accuracy). We shot 5 for 14 …. AB on a bad day shoots better than that. His lowest FT% game was .600 against Charlotte. The odd thing about Bargs, is that he’s better against 500+ teams.

He’d have absolutely no impact on the turnovers, which were a HUGE issue last night.

This statement …. we’ll have to agree to disagree on. Turnovers were huge, but as I explained earlier, they were quite a few unforced – a product of instability on the Offensive side. Which you have defined as being Andrea’s only strength …. Offensive stability.

The Raptors are probably going 0-3 on this trip with or without Bargs.

I agree partly. Last night – we win with a healthy Bargnani.
.
There are times when my bias affects my judgment, and I would be the first to admit it. I like Andrea – he’s not Dirk, not Wade, not Kobe – but I prefer him over Bosh (offense aside). Not to be offensive – we all get affected by personal views – however, I tend to believe your bias (with AB) affects your judgment more than normal. You make great points – just not so many about the big Italian guy. And that’s too bad – we have more pressing concerns than him.
.

by RapthoseLeafs on Dec 28, 2010 6:29 PM EST up reply actions  

what does this "and untill Bargnani is back lickely 0 for until."

not meaning to be picky, I can make and educated guess, but I have been told too many time I speak “spaghetti” English myself :)

ps that comes across as half English and half bash shell

by renato on Dec 28, 2010 11:50 AM EST reply actions  

mayo

Oj mayo just doesn’t look good. I know he’s having personal problems (with his dad) but again last he just didn’t look good and really hasn’t all season. I really wouldn’t be surprize if he’s traded soon a change of scenery would be good for him.

by sherwin316 on Dec 28, 2010 11:59 AM EST via mobile reply actions  

The problem with OJ Mayo is that he’s undersized. Seeing him line up against Barbosa really hammered this home. Their basically the same hight, which puts Mayo in “Tweener” purgatory.

by MAS11 on Dec 28, 2010 12:30 PM EST up reply actions  

so by getting Mayo you get Barbosa but with a big head… a loose loose situatio

by renato on Dec 28, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

Still what about defense?

I intentionally omitted Bargs in my comments because I knew we would be right back on the same old track. Why is this team in general unable to be a defensive team. Do we need to get rid of the players or coaches. Are these players slow learners?

by raptball on Dec 28, 2010 12:07 PM EST reply actions  

It's easy to say defense wins DS

But where’s the actual solutions for this team other than to say they need to play better defense.

by raptball on Dec 28, 2010 12:23 PM EST reply actions  

First of all you need to hit the "reply" button

Dude, I’ve tried to suggest this to you before. Please, it helps keep order to the thread. If you want to continue on one topic then use the reply option.

As far as your questions, why is this team so terrible defensively –
 1) Youth: They are starting young players in DeRozan and Weems at the wing (toughest position to guard in today’s NBA) who are obviously still struggling playing D in the NBA against the best players in the world. They probably wouldn’t be starting or playing major minutes for a competitive team, but SHOULD be starting and playing huge minutes a Raptors squad trying to develop. When they’re not starting Weems, their starting Kleiza, who may be the slowest footed player on defense on the team. Also, they are giving significant minutes to Davis, who will be a good defender one day but is still quite raw, and Amir Johnson who still can’t figure out how to stay on the court without fouling.

2) Add the abovementioned to fact that your anchor positions on defense (PG and C) are inhabbited by two of the worst defenders in the league.

Considering the above, I’m actually surprised the Raptors are as good as they are on defense at this point.

How do they get better? First, they need time. I believe players like Weems, DeRozan and Davis and even Johnson can be better defenders. Also, with the passing of time will come the day that Calderon’s contract elapses or he is traded. Second, eventually something will have to happen with Bargnani. Either he starts defending (unlikely), he’s traded or goes to the bench. If none of those three begin to happen, this team will still have a void on defense in the front court.

by MAS11 on Dec 28, 2010 12:55 PM EST up reply actions  

+1 to everything, except I am starting to question whether or not Sonny Weems is going to improve as I had thought he would…

by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 28, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

I’ll second this, along with Jumpshooters Weems comments. Need to see a lot more from him on the defensive end.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 28, 2010 4:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Well, they could start by employing wings and/or a point guard that force turnovers, go OVER screens, and attempt to keep their man in front of them (or slow penetration at the very least).

The subject of help defence probably doesn’t need to be addressed, since it will just result in a ‘Bargnani sucks’ discussion. But a little shot blocking would be nice.

Anything that limits your opponent’s possessions while creating a few extra of your own.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 8:02 PM EST up reply actions  

On a separate note

maybe he was still full of Christmas tapas, but who was the guy who wanted to offer “the other” Gasol the max?

by renato on Dec 28, 2010 12:43 PM EST reply actions  

I think there’s a case for balanced teams that excel in both aspects of the game, really

That statement ladies and gentlemen is a quote from the great Defensive Stance. Incredible that there is even an acknowledgement of an other aspect of the game

by raptball on Dec 28, 2010 12:44 PM EST reply actions  

sorry about that

I use the reply but it puts stuff everywhere.
Doin somethin wrong

by raptball on Dec 28, 2010 12:59 PM EST up reply actions  

So was there an issue with that statement? I think history has proven that good defensive teams win titles, but good offensive teams that are NOT good defensively, do not. So balance should be present, but the D is key as they say.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 28, 2010 4:10 PM EST up reply actions  

RE: Last night

Team injuries have taken it’s toll but lessons will be learned from it. Ball control is a major issue concerning the turn overs and they need practice on foul shots especially Dorsey the missed points can turn the tide. Good defense is your best offense in any game.

by Brian SB on Dec 28, 2010 12:46 PM EST reply actions  

The team

This team has a lot of talent and has to get of the flat footed game and get back into the basic of what each ones job is.

by Brian SB on Dec 28, 2010 12:51 PM EST reply actions  

I think until the team gets a few players healthy though, that’s going to be tough.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 28, 2010 4:02 PM EST up reply actions  

A Case for the Missing Offense

.
As my father always said, Defense is a function of Offense – if you have it, they don’t.

That point can best be illustrated by the high number of turnovers that seem more prevalent lately (with the Raptors). When the Offense is out-of-sync, Defense will not function properly. With turnovers, players have a more difficult time adjusting to the transition (back to Defense).

Boston may be symbolic of a top-level Defense, but it also ranks 1st in FG% and Assists. When they shoot, they score @ .501 clip. They control the ball better by movement. We don’t.

In the Memphis game, Raptor Offense was like a hot potato – "let someone else score". Add numerous turnovers, and that pretty much defines a lack of the big O … (more fake if anything).
.
Aside from the constant "Advisories" , that the score would not have been closer with Andrea, my belief is the opposite – not a big revelation coming from me (and other fans). Missing Andrea’s scoring, along with horrible 3 pt shooting, disrupted the Offensive flow of the game, and allowed the Grizzlies to focus their Defense on a tighter interior (in the Paint). It also allowed Memphis to take more chances … (granted – part of their persona).
.
For the Raptors, the absence of a typical 1st scoring option, is even more pronounced when your next option comes in at a 12.9 ppg clip. That’s not a true 2nd option, no matter how one looks at it. Boston’s 4th option comes in at that pace. Chicago’s 4th Scoring option ranks higher. Detroit’s 5th Option is one point below our 2nd guy. Washington’s 4th Option beats our #2 guy by two points. And on and on.
,
One can counter that Raps didn’t make the play-offs because our Defense sucked. Obviously I can’t say our Defense is just peachy, but there are a number of factors that need to be addressed (or need to evolve), outside of Defense:

  • A true 2nd Option needs to come forward (hopefully Demar)
  • 3 Point shooting needs a major upgrade (who’s guards us out there?)
  • The rest of the Front Court needs to improve its’ offense (12th overall w/1st @ Centre … God knows how bad without Andrea. 4th last year)
  • Get to the Line more often – our FT attempts (for December) have dramatically dropped. Getting the other team into foul trouble helps.
  • Time – Inexperience hampers us, and Rap fans need to be patient – Gelling is not a 3 month process. Immediate Contenders like Boston are not typical.

All that being said, Raptor Defense needs an infusion of either talent, or direction. Guys like Andrea are paid to score against Opponents. Guys who don’t have such a speciality, need to stop opponents from scoring. We have the former, and not the latter. As much as Andrea needs to improve on his Defense, last night illustrated that we need much more than that – like say … the rest of the team. Add a Noah type, even Noah-lite, and we balance the issue with Andrea. But yes, AB needs to pick it up, along with EVERY OTHER PLAYER.
.
Hopefully, both Defense & Offense can be addressed with time – with an infusion of defensive minded players, and someone else who can score.
.

by RapthoseLeafs on Dec 28, 2010 4:02 PM EST reply actions  

For the Raptors, the absence of a typical 1st scoring option, is even more pronounced when your next option comes in at a 12.9 ppg clip. That’s not a true 2nd option, no matter how one looks at it. Boston’s 4th option comes in at that pace. Chicago’s 4th Scoring option ranks higher. Detroit’s 5th Option is one point below our 2nd guy. Washington’s 4th Option beats our #2 guy by two points. And on and on.

This part of your post reinforces the fact that the Raptors are completely lacking any top-level talent. It’s kind of shocking when you look at it that way.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 8:10 PM EST up reply actions  

Here's the thing...

A good/great offensive team can afford to play softer D.

If you KNOW when you NEED points you can get them at will, then your D can be softer.

This means against weaker teams who have less consistent offense, you will see more wins than losses generally.

However, when you get into playoff quality teams, who ALSO have reliable consistent offense, you need the hard nosed D to tip the scales in your favour…

A hot offense will likely get you into the playoffs, but you need a good defense to carry you to a Championship…

Pure offense wins games, yes, against weaker teams… the Raptors closest thing to sure points regardless of matchup is Andrea, and that bodes poorly for TEAM success.

Playing the best D in the world isn’t going to help any team that has Reggie Evans as it’s go-to guy on offense… you need reliable offense or all the D isn’t gonna mean squadoosh…

Think of a Championship team like Fire

you need Fuel (we’ll call this Defense because it’s most about energy and intensity)
you need Heat (we’ll call this Offense for obvious reasons)
you need Air (we’ll call this coaching/mental proficiency because it’s less tangible)

Fires (Championship teams) have these things in different proportions.
Different types of fires take different tactics to fight.

But if you take any one thing completely away from the equation you put the fire out.

If you are really weak in one of those components it just makes for an easy decision as to how best put out the fire…

The Raps are currently weak at all three…

The Lakers have good Fuel and Heat but seem to lack Air when facing good competition…
The Celtics have great Fuel and Air but sometimes don’t bring the Heat…

That’s my spin on it anyways…

KDFREATPED

by Mikthaniel on Dec 28, 2010 4:36 PM EST reply actions  

By the Way

Memphis is over-rated … in my humble opinion. Take away our injuries, and I believe this game was ours.
 
Even with our “stumbling” of late, I still believe we’re a better team. We do suck against -500 teams (not a sign of a play-off team), but to me, that’s a function of youth, inexperience & leadership not developed (yet).
.
It goes without saying, that this has been a tough year (to watch). As much as developing is part of the process, it weighs on the psyche – especially for games like tonight. Meeting Dallas (at their absolute peak), while we’re not, almost seems pointless. Then you realize that this is an opportunity to see true character. It’s really all we have to look forward to. That’s why I sometimes see negativity as “piling on”, to the whole displeasure thing. It’s tough struggling through the latter – without the former rising to the top.
.

by RapthoseLeafs on Dec 28, 2010 4:49 PM EST reply actions  

Key injuries tonight

Dirk ou. Bargs out. Weems out. Calderon and Barbosa questionable.

by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 28, 2010 7:03 PM EST reply actions  

Sounds like a recipe for a Toronto surprise win!

Or…

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 28, 2010 7:58 PM EST up reply actions  

Dallas is too deep and too good, I think.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 28, 2010 8:12 PM EST up reply actions  

Have to say the Bargnani debate is getting better and better

At least we have a handful of games sans bargnani games to compare.

by axl t on Dec 29, 2010 11:03 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

RaptorsHQ is a growing, interactive community committed to providing the best Raptors and Canadian basketball content on the web.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Raptors and the Summer of 2013
Small
All Things Tanking Pt.2
Small
All Things Tanking  Pt.1
Small
The Jared Sullinger Project
Small
The Disturbing Parallels of Briyan Burkeangelo
Small
Who kidnapped James Johnson & replaced him with this guy?
In_rainbows_small
I am concerned; I think fans should be concerned.
Tfc_academy_small
Andrea Bargnani Interview
Small
Ed Davis and how he defines the Raps future
Small
Fan Perspective: Demar Derozan

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

2009_0503draft09-20006_-_williams_solo_small Adam Francis

Basketball_20gym_20in_20sun2009-01-27-1233091216_small RaptorsHQ - Howland

Editors

Viciousd_2005-01-20_small Raptors HQ - Vicious D

Authors

Burgundy_small RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance

Img_0813_small rbala