Raptors' Rapid Recap - LA Lakers 120 - Toronto Raptors 110
-A short-handed Toronto Raptors club gave it everything they had this afternoon, but eventually fell 120 to 110 to the LA Lakers. The Raps were without Sonny Weems again, but also without leading scorer Andrea Bargnani, who injured his ankle late in Friday night's game against the New Jersey Nets.
-Minus these two, and with Reggie Evans of course on the shelf, it was going to be a tall order against the Lake Show, winners of their past four road games. TO brought it early however, scoring 34 points in the first quarter and actually holding a lead for a good chunk of time. However the Lakers second unit closed the gap in the next quarter and by the time the half hit, this one was done.
-The key? Well there were a few for the Lakers. Once they slowed down the tempo, the Raps had a tough time scoring in the half-court and LA went on a run. As well, minus Evans, Bargnani, and with Ed Davis having a rough afternoon, the Lake Show dominated the glass, out-rebounding Toronto 46 to 35. Kobe led the way for his club with 20, but he had lots of help as five other Lakers scored in double figures.
-For the Raptors it was the Linas Kleiza show. Linas had 26 points and 10 rebounds and his best regular season game to date. He took good shots, was aggressive at both ends, and did a solid job on D and on the glass. However without Jose Calderon, his day wouldn't have been nearly as good, and in fact, the Raptors would have gotten rocked. Calderon had 20 points and 12 assists including many other sweet plays that allowed for easy looks from TO. It was great to see and hopefully the Raps can get this level of play from number ocho when Bargnani and Weems return.
-Hard to be upset by this loss even though Toronto briefly held the lead. The Lakers are simply a much deeper and talented club, and that shone through in the end. However Toronto fought hard, and various individuals like Joey Dorsey, Julian Wright and DeMar DeRozan had flashes of brilliance, flashes that hopefully help this Raptors team not only against the Pistons in their next match, but also further down the road this season.
56 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
DeMar DeRozan had flashes of brilliance, flashes that hopefully help this Raptors team not only against the Pistons in their next match, but also further down the road this season.
by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 19, 2010 5:16 PM EST up reply actions
I like the 11 trips to the line for DeRozan. If he could get to the line 8+ times per game, I’d be impressed.
But he offered little resistance guarding Kobe. And for a shooting guard, his 3-point percentage remains an embarassment.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 19, 2010 6:44 PM EST up reply actions
I’m not sure how you can say he had more than “flashes” considering he had 19 of his 23 came in one quarter. He was invisible for the other 3 and offered little in terms of resistance against Kobe.
Yep, it’s Kobe, but some of those plays were just terrible defensive attempts that anyone would have taken advantage of him off of.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 6:47 PM EST up reply actions
in fairness to Derozan
it was Kobe Bryant.
He blew by Kobe 3 or 4 times to get to the bucket…. and Kobe is a world class defender. Thats life on the perimeter.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 11:29 PM EST up reply actions
Missing the MAGIC MAN
Led by Calderon, Kleiza, and DeRozan, Rap’s dominated the Lakers starters, but the lack of help from the bench, highlighed by Bayless and Barbosa struggling vs the Lakers bench cost the game, as Bynum, Barnes, and Brown etc. dominated.
A good learning opportunity, but not a productive one, with Alabi, Dorsey, and Davis vs the likes of Gasol, Bynum, and Odom.
Raptors still have not won a game that Bargnani did not score 20 plus points averaging at least 25 points in all 10 wins.
Props for Triano from Phil Jackson
"Jay had a lot of things, trying to cook up a zone, trying to keep us at bay," said Lakers coach Phil Jackson. "We’d get going and he’d throw zone out there and slow us down. They did some things that create conflict for us."
Good to see JT becoming more and more confident and knowledgeable this season.
Slowed them down to the tune of 120 points. Haha.
Raps just don’t have the personnel to slow anyone down, it seems.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 19, 2010 6:40 PM EST up reply actions
I thought Jay did some nice things this afternoon too and in fact did get LA out of their rhythm on numerous occasions…he just didn’t have the horses to carry the whole thing through.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 6:48 PM EST up reply actions
So without the main big man...
The Rockets have lost Yao…
We have decent continuity without Bargs…
Soooo…
Calderon / Bayless
Martin / Derozan
Battier / Weems / Wright / Stojakovic
Johnson / Dorsey / Evans
Davis / Alabi
Peja is money in the bank and Reggie will get suitors…
Thoughts?
This is a tough one for me because Battier (as much as I love him), is on the downside of his career, and Martin is a bit of a one-dimensional chucker. I’d rather get a traditional big man back who can protect the paint, but I realize those aren’t so easy to come by.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 6:52 PM EST up reply actions
bargs for Martin
is like trading Bargnani for the sg version of Bargnani
agree with Battier… if this team was contending right now he would be a great addition. But since its not….
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 11:31 PM EST up reply actions
Don’t think it would change us that much, for better or for worse. Our frontcourt would still stink and big men would continue to feast on us.
by sashathefanboy on Dec 19, 2010 7:00 PM EST up reply actions
When I saw Kevin Martin included, you lost me. I’m all for trading Bargnani, but I’d like to a) get someone younger back and b) not get someone who doesn’t play defense.
Besides, it seems to me that you’re just trying to push the Raptors into mediocrity, without doing anything for them long term. I really like Battier, but you’re getting two players who are 27 and 32. Why?
Tim W.
The Picket Fence
Moreover
Some player production is not just relevant per se, in a salary cap dominated environment, production it is relevant in relation to what it’s price tag is. With such perspective, Andrea is not just the best player on the team, he is also the most important going forward as his production comes with a small price tag attached to it to it, allowing a team to bring in other players. You could have CB or a 15 or Arenas at 20 ( or others, the list is long) to give you marginally better numbers but who would not allow you to sing an Igoudala (just as an example). Moreover it is quite evident #7 has not reached his ceiling (hich has to be quite stressful for his detractors) so your urge for trading Bargnani is kind of puzzling.
The fact that Bargnani is the best player on the team says far more about the Raptors roster than it does about Bargnani. And whether or not Bargnani has reached his “ceiling” or not is not the point. The point is that he will always be a bad defensive player and below average rebounder, which means it’s nearly impossible to win with him as a core member of your team. The Raptors already failed to build a contender around a talented but flawed big man. Let’s not make the same mistake again.
And my urge to trade Bargnani is only puzzling to those who don’t understand the necessity for your big men to be good defensive players and rebounders if you want to build a true contender.
Tim W.
The Picket Fence
Completely irrelevant topic but did anyone see Joey Dorsey’s behind the back pass to Linas Kleiza on that fastbreak. That got me out of my seat and thinking….with Dorsey’s 6’9 athletic frame and Hedo out of town, maybe we can use him as a point forward? Jose seems very comfortable off the ball and his 3 is money when open, and with Dorsey running show at the top of the perimeter in out half court offense, the rest of the league stands no chance. The dude has serious talent and skill like that should not go unnoticed.
A little satire to put this loss into perspective. No one expected us to win this game, and 10 point loss to the 2 time champs isn’t a bad outing at all for this team.
Offense trumps defense again
The Raps were making a little run then at the 5 minute mark, Raps break out and Kleiza takes a wide open three and misses. Ball goes the other way and Raps come up with a rebound, then down for another wide open 16 footer by Amir and again a miss. Lakers back down for an open Steve Blake and bang – three in the bank. Two open Toronto looks and nothin.
The team that can put the ball in the hoop wins – that’s called offense baby and it is just as important as defense if not more so
Not sure how offense trumps defense. Without actually stopping a team from scoring, you’re not going to be able to beat many teams. The Raptors went on their runs, in large part, because of their defense. Sometimes shots don’t fall, but if you’re playing great defense, you’re usually not out of the game. As Not So Friendly Stranger, said, we know where your bias is. And just for future reference, I don’t want you playing on my team.
Tim W.
The Picket Fence
"that’s called offense baby and it is just as important as defense if not more so"
really? what happened to its 50/50? I guess we know where your ‘bias’ is……
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 11:33 PM EST reply actions
it is 50/50
Moreover, while you can be off on your offense due to external factors (ex your team mates failing to give you the ball, or giving it with bad timing) effort on D is just up to you, so it is easier to be a consistent defender than a good O guy, meaning one could be asked to provide consistent effort on D as it just up to him to bring it.
On the other hand, since facing good D is expected nigh in and night out being able to score is and added value and something people are willing to pay for. This is something that will puzzle blue collars, but it is true never the less.
man Renato
its like you are arguing with yourself… what you said about D is spot on.
but then you get to the 2nd paragraph… where teams are not expecting to be facing good D every night, because some people don’t do the things you mentioned in the first paragraph. And then to relate it to $ value for the price of admission? I agree offense will sell more tickets than defense initially. But I would wager championship teams and the money from playoffs tickets is much more valuable in the long run. thats something people are even more willing to pay for than anything on offense.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 7:41 AM EST up reply actions
Good job, you called me on it
Actually I have really enjoyed this debate about offense verses defense. Up until a few weeks ago, I was very much in the Defense camp. I had always used the “they say defense wins championships” quote. But the Bargnani situation made me rethink the whole thing. I had never really questioned the idea. I think we do that with lots of things in life
While watching the Lakers game yesterday, it occured to me that there is only two types of shots – open or contested. Further more there are a certain number in every game that are uncontested. It is in those situations where defense plays no part in the game.
In actual fact, defense is only sucessfull on steals, charges, fouls or blocked shots . Putting a hand up means nothing to these athletes. Ultimately, it boils down to shooting. Many times over the years, I have been disappointed when in crunch time, the Raps miss wide open shots at one end while guys like Ray Allen or who ever hit tough shots shots at the other end. It turns out that it is the best shooter under the most pressure that determines the out come. The top teams consistantly do that.
Further more the rules are designed to give offense the edge. They prohibit charges under the net, they call touch fouls, they don’t allow hand checking and you can advance the ball with a time out.
So the reallity is that offense is the more important, although I certainly agree that defense is very important
in some ways you are right
the game definetely has changed to allow the offense more opportunity and more ‘highlight’ reel plays. But that does nothing to discount the importance of defense. Just because its harder to do doesn’t mean its not as valuable. In fact I’d argue that it makes a good defender even more valuable to a team.
Defense also goes well beyond just the simple value of a steal, block etc. Altering shots, making shots more difficult, not letting a player get position, preventing them from getting the ball etc, all will not allow an opponent to get the ball or get the shot they want. Its not always about stopping them, sometimes its about making their life as difficult as possible… and that will really add up over the course of a game.
All you have to do is look at the teams, over the coures of the last 20 years, who both made the finals and won the finals to see what defense means to a team. They are constantly top defensive teams.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 7:32 AM EST up reply actions
raptball
You lost this argument the second you said “the Bargnani situation made me rethink the whole thing”. The fact of the matter is defense DOES win championships, Bargs has not.
Bargnani shouldn’t make you rethink anything since his play is not resulting in wins. Of course, there are several other factors (horrid wing play chief among them) in play. But Bargnani is not LeBron James.
The Steve Nash “7 seconds or less Suns” could make you rethink offence vs. defence. That’s an argument I would buy.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 20, 2010 10:35 AM EST up reply actions
That game is why Greg Oden went #1 over Kevin Durant. If your big men can control the inside, life is SOOOO much easier for the rest of your players.
Tim W.
The Picket Fence
and frankly
It is still easier (salary wise) having a Durant, getting yourself a Perkins than having an Healthy Oden and find a superstar offense minded player . I see you have a strong preference for defensive minded players, which is fine, just keep in mind an opinion, opposite to yours, is as legitimate.
Renato brings up a good point...
I talked about it before, but defense gets you in the coaches good books and offense gets you All Star votes…
You can get a guy to specialize in playing top level defense as opposed to having an elite scoring touch for a lot less dollars. You find someone great on offense and he is likely earning MUCHO dollars because he puts fans in the seats. You find a guy who is just as good, but it’s on the defensive end, and the likelihood is he is paid a lot less while significantly determining the outcome of games/series/championships…
Yes, you need those guys to hit clutch shots, Ray Allen is a great example… BUT Allen also plays defense well and the other guys on his team do so as well and THAT’S why they win…
Ask Allen Iverson how many rings he can attribute to his elite level scoring…
AI was never an elite level efficient scorer.
by dhackett1565 on Dec 20, 2010 7:26 AM EST up reply actions
I would stop to focus on one individual
as it is always a matter or who he was surrounded with. That is another reason to have a look at the price tag a certain production comes by. If Iverson was paid 10M per year do you thing that would have increased his chances to win a title?
Ray Allen
has bought into Doc Rivers defensive system. And while he is not an elite defender, he is a solid defender that works every night on D.
He is not afraid of giving a hard foul, trying to disrupt passes, taking charges, chasing his man around.
Its not always about the abililty but about the effort and bball IQ. That will always make up, at least in part, for not being the tallest, strongest or being the most athletic.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 7:36 AM EST up reply actions
Ray Allen
Has won a hell of a lot more games with the sword than with the shield
yet didn't get his crown
until he used his shield….
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 7:42 AM EST up reply actions
ok well if you want to look at it that way
where are those good defenders on that team? PF and C……
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 7:53 AM EST up reply actions
No
Ray Allen is no defensive specialist. That’s the problem with offering examples because you ignore the point. I will restate: There are times when defense plays no part in the game and the rules are biased toward offense. Many games boil down to a shoot out. Best shooter under pressure wins.
the three at the buzzer
will always make the highlight reel and will be remembered in history
What goes ignored is the guy who prevented the inbounds pass to stop the play from happening, the guy who stayed up on the shooter to make it difficult when he misses, the guy who prevented the previous bucket, or got the rebound, to allow that play to happen.
You can’t look at one isolated incident and then say everything previous to that doesn’t matter. It does, thats what set the ground work for that final play (or set of plays) to happen.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 7:50 AM EST up reply actions
Yet it is that last action
of shooting the ball that is called offense and decides the outcome. If the offense fails in that last second, the game is lost.
not at all
if a stop was made earlier, that shot becomes pointless. If a stop is made preventing that final shot the game is won.
and you can just as likely say if the defense fails in the last second the game is lost.
There are 48 minutes in a game.. you have to put yourself in a position to win or to loose.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 8:09 AM EST up reply actions
Great debates
Some interesting points made here last night and early this morning – might have to elaborate on some of these in a blog post soon.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
don't mean to be a dick
but I don’t even know how this is a debate… this is basketball 101
first 2 things I learned when playing competitive ball….
1) every turnover you make is an opporunity lost and an opportunity gained for your opponents (and likely 10 windsprints next practice)
2)you may not shoot well every night, but you can play defense every day. (and likely 10 windsprints either way)
That was literally the first discussion my first coach gave before tryouts (and after 10 windsprints)
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 20, 2010 8:18 AM EST up reply actions
D vs O and Andrea
His D is average for a big, one on one and very weak on help D and pick and roll. He is also far too indifferent in his rebounding. If he fixed these issues he would be an all star, but he hasn’t fixed them yet and they continue to be a glaring weakness.
His O is very good and he has shown he can score in a variety of ways. Toronto needs a scorer because no one else on the Raps averages even 15 pts a game and no one else commands a double team even occasionally.
I don’t think it makes any sense to trade Andrea for Battier and Martin, are you nuts? Martin is not what we need at all and Battier is but how could you expect to get an inspired Battier at his age on a team that is struggling? Battier deserves and wants to go to a contender, not Toronto. Remember, let’s get guys who want to be here, not guys we hope will make the most of it. Right now, we are stuck with Andrea and that’s not the worst thing because he’s been our best player this season and he continues to improve every year. Another year or two of putting up 20+ and 8 rebounds and his trade value will sky rocket. Right now I think we are better off keeping him and hoping he continues to get better.
For all those Andrea detractors, isn’t he doing better this season than you predicted? Be honest.
For all those Andrea detractors, isn’t he doing better this season than you predicted? Be honest.
Not really. His scoring is up with the higher usage and shot attempts. Almost every other metric you’d look at is similar or down year over year. You can’t look at Bargnani and say he’s made any kind of a “leap” this season, especially defensively.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 20, 2010 11:48 PM EST reply actions
























