Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Trent Richardson Interviews Fellow Brown Brandon Weeden

Tip-In: Il Mago - Bargnani Powers Raptors Past Nets in Fourth


The game didn't start out so well but Andrea Bargnani ensured Toronto's 10th win of the season with a Dirk-esque second half performance...

Star-divide

"The Raptors once again showed that amongst the league’s worst teams, they are top of the heap."

Those words were tweeted by Tim Chisholm last night after the Toronto Raptors' 98 to 92 win over the New Jersey Nets, a win that for a while, didn't look like it was going to happen.

Then Andrea Bargnani shifted things into high gear, putting on both a magical, and frustrating performance.

Let's talk magic first, because I can honestly say that the second half of last night's game was the first time I could understand the "Il Mago" moniker in my nearly five years of watching him play.  He was simply unstoppable and toyed with Kris Humphries, his defender, who must have been wondering who the hell this guy was.  He certainly wasn't the same Andrea who he often replaced under Sam Mitchell's watchful eye.  (Yes, good' ol Sam Mitchell was back in town for the first time with another club.)  No, this Andrea was bound and determined to get a W for the Raptors and Mr. Kardashian was helpless to stop him.

"Oh, you're not going to let me post up?  How about a nice little spinning fade-away?"

"You're going to try and take that away?  Well I'm going to pump-fake you and pull-up for the J."

"That was too easy, how about I simply drive down the lane and dunk?  Or maybe I'll shoot this 3 since no one wants to see me get position inside now..."

And on and on.

I later flipped over to Sportsnet One to watch the Mavs hammering the Suns and Dirk didn't look as much like Dirk as Andrea did last night.

I commented in the chat that it was a sight for sore eyes.

Which brings me to the frustrating part...

When can Raptors' fans expect to see this on a consistent basis?  Because as truly awesome as this offensive display was, I don't think a single fan can be certain we'll see this level of play again against LA on Sunday, against Detroit after that, etc, etc.

And the bigger problem for me isn't the offence, it's that when his offence isn't clicking, well, Andrea just doesn't provide any value to the team, and the first half of last night's game was the perfect example.

He had 2 first quarter points, 6 second quarter points, and was something like 3 of 14 from the field.  But the real problem is that he wasn't stopping the Kris Humphries/Brook Lopez show, and he wasn't getting his teammates involved either.  It was classic "Black-Hole Bargnani," the one who floats and kind of settles for certain types of shots.

But then in the second half, when the shot started to fall, suddenly he's diving on the floor for loose balls, rebounding in traffic, blocking shots and finding teammates for open looks.

It was almost comical.

If the Raptors want to keep building this season towards eventually being a playoff team again, this consistency needs to start happening with Andrea.  To Tim Chisholm's point, it's fine to do this against the Nets, but it's highly unlikely this late-game barrage by Bargs is enough to get Toronto a win against a club like the aforementioned Mavericks.  In fact even with Andrea's dominance, it took a huge Leandro Barbosa 3 with about a minute left (off a nice pass by Bargs I might add) to cement this win as New Jersey was never down by more than a basket.

To me then there's two pieces to take from this win.

The biggie of course is that it would be great to see much more of the second half Andrea going forward.  He doesn't have to be quite as dominant as he was last night, but he needs to be aggressive from the start of games and has to try and impact matches in other ways, even if his shot isn't falling.

The other point though, and a salient one I believe, is that Bargs can't do it all himself.  He needs help, and a lot of the time this season that hasn't happened.  Last night the Raps got very good games from Linas Kleiza (18 points, 12 rebounds) and Jose Calderon (15 points and 14 assists), but that too was barely enough.  Toronto's bench produced a measly 6 points, and DeMar DeRozan, although he had an emphatic dunk in the match's final minutes, was a ghastly 5 of 16 from the field in 33 minutes.  At some point the switch needs to start turning on for him on a regular basis too if Toronto wants to not only beat the New Jersey Nets' of the league, but also clubs like their foe on Sunday, the Los Angeles Lakers.

Comment 93 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Can you define consistency?

while I believe this is just the second time he goes over 30 I believe there is a sizable number of games he got 25+ and a bigger sample where he was 20+ (in 25 games plaid so far) I believe also rebounding is about 8 per game after Evans went down.
These performances come off a season where for the first time he is (or should be, more on that later) carrying the weight of the offense and, as you said, basically alone (Chris had Drea to keep opponents honest, who does Drea have?).
For your own admission Andrea’s performance has crushed your expectations this season and yet you do not (ever) seem satisfied with it. I also remember at the beginning of the season we said we should allow a period for him (but also for the team) to get used to be the 1st option. I can live with him having an off night or two and I can live also with the team not giving him the ball in his sweet spots for a game or two as they ALL need to get used to the situation and are still exploring ways to get the most of him in the NEW situation. Put the two together and I can see a bit of a roller coaster kind of thing, but it cannot be denied the trend underneath the swings, is up.
That said, again, I buy the argument on his D, which is more irritating since there is an “on” position on D as well and one has to wonder why it isn’t “on” all the time. I have to say however the same people who like to bash Andrea’s D are often cheering for players who are no better than him on D or overall which make the whole thing a bit puzzling.

So, at the end, I would like constant production (which means what for him 25+ average? because this is what we are talking about if we add consistency) but he should be allowed to go trough some growing pain since also expectations on his role are growing at the same time.

So, to finish up this rant, who gave you sore eyes? maybe they are a bit self inflicted?

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 11:38 AM EST reply actions  

You can measure Andrea’s consistency by the amount of visits by Renato. If Andrea has a good game (which he did last night, offensively of course) Renato will show up on raptors HQ to trumpet what an amazing player he is and disparage any criticism of Bargnani’s game. If he does not play well, Renato is no where to be found. It’s like clockwork. The fact that Renato has been absent for weeks at a time this season is proof enough to me that Bargnani remains inconsistent.

by MAS11 on Dec 18, 2010 12:44 PM EST up reply actions  

bravo MAS11

your a total idiot. you have no proof renato was nowhere to be found, hes been consistently backing bargnani up especially when you guys keep bashing him right after he struggles in a game or when he didnt do enough to tickle your fancy. its not like i see you here giving bargs props when he deserves it, like last night, but no you just have to be a pessimist in every single post about how bargnani is the worst player in the world. grow some balls

by tea time on Dec 18, 2010 1:08 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, you are the idiot. If you could read at a highschool level, you would notice I did give Bargs credit for having a good game last night. Here, maybe you need me to hold your hand. Read the end of the first line, in parenthesis. And you made my point for me with the following quote: “hes been consistently backing bargnani up”. I’ve been saying to Renato for years that he’s been defending Bargnani , despite the mountaine of statistics and expert analysis has been pointing the other direction.

by MAS11 on Dec 18, 2010 1:46 PM EST up reply actions  

Good comment Renato – for me it’s not even a game-to-game consistency. A lot of the time it’s quarter to quarter! Yes, Andrea’s indeed smashed my expectations, but as my CEO at my day job would say to us “if you were way off in your expectations, then your expectations were way too low!”

As well, I’m trying to look at this on a macro level; as in “how do we get this team to the next level.”

That’s why it wasn’t only Andrea that I discussed, but also guys like DeRozan. Until the efforts from these players who are meant to be key cogs in the team’s future can put up consistent efforts, then this club is going to struggle.

So again, I’m cheering for Bargnani to keep improving and developing, but that doesn’t mean my expectations aren’t going to keep rising as well, as they should.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:21 PM EST up reply actions  

forget your CEO

I give people working for me all sort of lines…. I am sure there is also a book fir this “wisdom pills” one of my favorite is: “I know you do not like doing that but I still need you to do it, if one could just do what he likes it would not be work, it would be a hobby” :))

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 8:16 PM EST up reply actions  

on your points

fair enough but I had missed the step where your opinion went from “write off” to the “building block”. (along the season I mean). On the other had, I agree with your point on how the points are produced and we could also add another KPI as: let’s have a look how many FT he is shooting, ideally one would like between 25-30 points produced on good % while shooting between 5 and 10 FT per game while grabbing 8-10 rebounds per game on decent to good defense and with about 4 to 5 assists per game.

if so, please appreciate that your baseline is a perennial all star, which is fine, but please accept and acknowledge it yourself too.

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 8:32 PM EST up reply actions  

I am nowere to be found in game threads

as they usually take place during the late night in the time zone I am into but, I am here otherwise. I actually was thinking the same about you, funny enough. The one difference is I do call the bad (on Andrea and on the team) as well as the good and, normally, I am not acting, I am reacting, at the opposite of you who seem out on a mission.

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I was making the comment as you are conspicuously absent, except when Bargnani has a good game. Which has been the case.

by MAS11 on Dec 18, 2010 1:47 PM EST up reply actions  

I agree renato, mas is way off base on this

by axl t on Dec 18, 2010 2:24 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

blackhole?

even in the 1st half AB was the only guy that offered good resistance to brook lopez & humpries… blocking shots & just being big… even when his shots was struggling. there were a few lapses but even bill russell, malone or the greatest defenders gets scored on at times. & when AB was out amir was busy collecting silly fouls getting the team to penalty & dorsey & davis were getting abused by lopez & humpries & favors at will.

by xUnKnOwNx on Dec 18, 2010 12:11 PM EST reply actions  

he did a good job on Lopez

when the double teams came. But he did play big in front of him.. which is good enough considering what we usually get from him.

But he watched players move by him so many times it was ridiculous. Atleast twice Amir came over to help when Bargs had a better initial position to help, resulting in fouls on Amir.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 18, 2010 12:14 PM EST up reply actions  

agreed

definitely he has a lotto improve in his defensive reactions & reflex.. he is good at one on one low post defending.. but not pick & roll or help defense… (aside from his big block in the fourth). just dont agree to the

“And the bigger problem for me isn’t the offence, it’s that when his offence isn’t clicking, well, Andrea just doesn’t provide any value to the team, and the first half of last night’s game was the perfect example.

He had 2 first quarter points, 6 second quarter points, and was something like 3 of 14 from the field. But the real problem is that he wasn’t stopping the Kris Humphries/Brook Lopez show, and he wasn’t getting his teammates involved either. It was classic “Black-Hole Bargnani,” the one who floats and kind of settles for certain types of shots."

just being in the floor.. whether he hits his shots or not creates space for his team mates. & makes the oppposing team focus their D on him that creates more opportunity for others..
so the black hole just doesnt make sense

by xUnKnOwNx on Dec 18, 2010 12:23 PM EST up reply actions  

problem there though is

the team wasn’t scoring, and he wasn’t creating a threat for other team to watch out for.

This goes back to the ‘consistency’ Franchise was talking about. Teams will do 1 of 2 things early in the game against Bargs.

1) Immediately throw a double team at him when he gets the ball (happened a few times this seson). They see how he handles it and then leave him until he ‘gets hot’
2) leave him in a 1 on 1 situation and see how he is shooting. If he ‘gets hot’ they’ll send more guys his way. If not they leave him.

either way, unless he gets hot, he is doing little to actually help his teammates. Its not like other offensive threats, that at any and every point of the game you need to double, front, not leave, stay up on etc. Coaches/mngers know this. They watch tape, they know NBA players as well as we know the players on this team. They are telling there players exactly what to do against Bargs. Watch him and if he gets hot then double/attack on D. If not just stay in front of him. Attack him and the rim on offense.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 18, 2010 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

1) Immediately throw a double team at him when he gets the ball (happened a few times this seson). They see how he handles it and then leave him until he ‘gets hot’
2) leave him in a 1 on 1 situation and see how he is shooting. If he ‘gets hot’ they’ll send more guys his way. If not they leave him.

Great points.

I noticed this last night, and in previous games as well. If he doesn’t get off to a hot start, the opposition forgets ideas of double-teams, and concentrates on attacking him at the other end. There were a couple of times last night that Kris Humphries, hardly Dwight Howard, went around him as if Andrea’s legs were stuck in quicksand.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:24 PM EST up reply actions  

consitency

actual definition – “ability to be asserted together without contradiction”

in more laymans terms in reference to a player/sport/person etc. – to do the same thing (or close to) on a regular basis.

So with Bargs its him being even close to the same player in any game or in any quarter. This doesn’t mean a player can’t have a bad game or an exceptional game… but regularily provide the same thing on any given day.

As for his scoring… yes he consistently puts up around 20 points a game. However how he shoots (fg%) is inconsistent. How he rebounds is inconsistent. How hard he tries (on D and on O… such as attacking the basket) is inconsistent. This not only changes game to game, but can swing wildly within a game itself.

As for Bargs D, I highly question how every player that has ever started in a Raps uni since Bargs became a regular starter is seen as a bad defender (Jose, Jack, Weems, Derozan, Hedo, Bosh, Moon, Parker, Kleiza, Evans…. now I don’t agree that those guys are all bad defenders, but they have been accused of being bad defenders on numerous occasions around here). He is the only constant in that equation…. there is the reasonable possibility that he is so bad on D he hurts everyone else. Not that that means everyone is good and Bargs makes them look bad, but rather they are at the very least no as bad as he makes them look… or as bad as he is.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 18, 2010 12:11 PM EST reply actions  

so in other words

he is the root of all problems. Is he?

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 1:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Agreeing again here with “Not so Friendly.” I talked about this in previous comments but I wish people would forget how many points Andrea scores.

It’s HOW he scores them!

If he’s settling for J’s and shooting a terrible percentage, he KILLS the team because he doesn’t look for passing opportunities very often. It’s “head down and make an offensive move.”

Consistently he scores…but whether that’s at his teammates expense, and whether he contributes in other areas…well that varies a great deal from game to game, and even quarter to quarter.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:26 PM EST up reply actions  

The Raptors were bad defensively long before Bargs became a starter. He wasn’t even starting yet when Moon and Parker were here (although I can’t remember many people calling out Parker’s defense). You might as well put it all on Chris Bosh – he was the constant.

I've been looking at the sky

by Back In Black on Dec 19, 2010 9:45 AM EST up reply actions  

you know

if you look at opponents points, point differential, oponents fg%, and opponents turnovers… there is a steady correlation (decrease in defensive performance) over the past 5 years (with an increase in opponents turnovers this year).

There is also one other constant over those 5 years and that is the increase of Bargs playing time.

Under Smitch and limited Bargs (ie. minutes/bench)
06/07
opponents PPG – 98.5
point differential – +1
OP fg% – .463
Op turn – 15.1

07/08 (decrease in Bargnani’s minutes per game… lowest of his career, although marginal from rookie year)
97.3
+2.9
.458
14.0

Under Triano and Bargs starting
08/09 (entire year.. not from when JO was traded or when Triano was promoted)
101.9
-2.9
.465
13.3

09/10
105.9
-1.8
.468
12.7

10/11 (to date)
104.9
-3.0
.486
14.5

(the one thing I don’t have here to make the comparison ‘better’ is league averages in each of those years.) Only constants over those years are Bargs and Jose. Jose play time however fluxuated greatly (bench, starter, injury, timeshare)… Bargs minutes and usage steadily increased over that time.

make of it what you will

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 10:26 AM EST up reply actions  

Actually it was obvious to many of us that Parker lost a massive step between his first year with the Raptors and his second year. I believe a number of people pointed it out back then too.

by McGateway on Dec 20, 2010 1:44 PM EST up reply actions  

Improvement

Man, we sound like Philadelphia Eagles fans. Why do we pan the best player on our team all the time?

Andrea had a good game and was the main reason we won, especially in the second half. He has continued to improve, in my opinion, every year he has played. He’s an offensive minded centre, with a very high skill set and a bunch of role players around him. He’s not KG, he is what he is. Luckily for us he keeps getting better and what he is continues to be better than what he was.

One thing to consider, how many Raptor players have solid contracts that another team would like to have? I think you could argue, that for all the Raptors making 5 million plus this season that Andrea is the best value and the most desirable asset on the team. That says to me we should consider discussing the short comings of other players. The only guy who lived up to expectations was Reggie and he’s hurt.

Where’s Linas been? Why can’t Amir stop fouling and still be aggressive? Jose needs to be more consistent and continue to try harder on D.
Demar and Sonny both need to pick up their games a lot or move to the bench.

Who has done their job? Andrea, Barbosa and Reggie and even though there is room for improvement in his decision making, Bayless should be mentioned as well.

Truthfully Andrea is one of the least interesting players to discuss their progress on this team. He’s doing what we expected, maybe even a bit better. The rest of the starting lineup has been playing below expectations and maybe if Sonny, Demar Linas and Jose started hitting their shots it would open up the floor for Andrea.

I don’t even like Bargs, but he’s not the Raptor I am upset with and he’s not the guy that has hurt his team the most. He has probably been our best player this season though he is far from perfect and his D is and always has been an issue especially on the pick and roll. No one can argue that, but he’s also the only Raptor who has commanded a double team regularly as well. I hope he keeps improving.

by defensive rap on Dec 18, 2010 1:02 PM EST reply actions  

Couldn't agree more

For those clamoring for more consistency from him, what does he have to do to meet your definition of consistency? Does he have to put up 25 pts each and every night with the occasional off night?

Considering this is the first time he has been the number 1 option, the first time he has seen double teams, the first time he has been the focal point of the opposition defensive schemes, I think he has actually done ok. He has been under 20 points only 10 times this year. Compare that to other bigs around the league:
Aldrich – 19 times
Pau Gasol – 13 times
Bosh – 17 times
Lopez – 13 times
West – 14 times
Jefferson – 18 times
Sure he is no Dirk….who else matches Dirk’s consistency (maybe only Stoudemire).

On defence, he will always be below average but it has gotten better. Since Evans went down, Bargs rebounding numbers have been decent. Yeah, Lopez and Humphries picked up a few points….but which of our bigs did a better job last night.

Bargs is nowhere near a perfect player, but he is our best player. As Defensive Rap states, there are too many other guys on this team underperforming that are getting a free ride.

by cmrm123 on Dec 18, 2010 1:14 PM EST up reply actions  

its not all

ABOUT POINTS!

and even then when it comes to scoring its not all about just the actual value. You can’t ignore fg%. Trips to the FT line. Assists and turnovers.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 18, 2010 1:55 PM EST up reply actions  

For this team it is

Bargs is the only thing separating the raps from total embarrassment…

by axl t on Dec 18, 2010 2:32 PM EST via mobile up reply actions  

Again, I’ll echo Not So’s comments.

FORGET POINTS

I had to laugh last night when Devlin trumpted that Bargnani scores 24 points in wins, and 19 points in losses.

HE STILL SCORES A TON IN LOSSES!

Maybe if he scored 20 in wins and 10 in losses, fine, but it’s the way he gets those 20, and the other aspects of his game that are the difference makers!

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:28 PM EST up reply actions  

Woah, hold on.

I agree with your statements about his FG% and his all around game being important, BUT…

5 PPG is a MASSIVE difference. You can’t just write that off – oh 24 in wins, 19 in losses, no correlation. This isn’t 5 points in a single game, or a couple games, it is an average over 10 games versus an average over an even greater number of games.

by dhackett1565 on Dec 18, 2010 9:03 PM EST up reply actions  

No you’re right, and I knew this was going to come up.

Guess this comes back to how much you believe in basketball statistics as there is no statistical significance between scoring and wins, especially in terms of a differential like that.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 9:08 PM EST up reply actions  

All you have to do is look at Starbury and others like him for that. There have been a ton of guys in this league who could score over 20 points per game but their teams never went anywhere (look at J Crawford before he went to Atlanta). One player scoring 20+ per game does not make him an all-star or even a star.

by McGateway on Dec 20, 2010 1:48 PM EST up reply actions  

Hey I didn't say anything about winning games

I’m talking about keeping every team handing us blowout losses, which is what it would be without him

by axl t on Dec 19, 2010 12:14 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

5 pts?

That’s a decent spread between wins and losses. A guy who scores 24 in wins and 19 in losses tells me two things. He scores a lot, and the team wins when he scores more.

Aren’t there other guys in the league that are not great on D but good offensively and get a better deal from the fans and critics. I am thinking specifically of Nash, Hedo two years ago, VC, Jose, Amare, Ellis, Ben Gordon (he’s played so bad he now needs both names to identify him) and so on… Weird that no Lakers are on that list. No Celtics either. I wanted to throw Bosh on that list too but it seemed spiteful and unfair though not totally unwarranted. There are no Jazz players on this list either, thank you Mr. Sloan.

 Andrea is not what I hoped for but he’s done better than I expected after the first two seasons. And it’s not his fault, all he can do is try and I think he has tried each year to improve.

Right now he has about as much trade value as CB4 or Brandon Roy. For the Raps, I’d currently take Andrea over both those guys. Come on HQ, Toronto needs to embrace it’s players and have a reputation of loving it’s own instead of hating it’s best player as you have been prone to do. I don’t even disagree with your arguments against Andrea, but imagine if we drafted him 13th overall?

If Andrea was drafted 14th overall you’d be happier with him. If he improves for two more years, at the same rate he’s has done for the last two wouldn’t we all be pleased with his effort? Shouldn’t we give him the chance to do so?

Go Raps!

by defensive rap on Dec 19, 2010 3:57 AM EST up reply actions  

I’m not sure why people think I “hate” on Andrea. I don’t. I’d be over the moon if he turns into another Dirk and could care less about where he was drafted.

What I care about is the organization, and need to raise the red flag when I feel they’ve hitched their wagon to the wrong horse. Simple as that. Fans have short memories but before Bosh’s breakthrough campaign last year, we were harder on him than Bargs. Andrea has been anointed a cornerstone of the franchise by management, and in Bosh’s absence and as the most talented player, he’s going to draw the bulk of critiques on a night by night basis. That isn’t to say that others get a free pass; the other cornerstone is DeRozan and I’m much less excited about his potential than Andrea…

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

I bet

one is done, the other one produces less for twice the money….

by renato on Dec 19, 2010 9:42 AM EST up reply actions  

i also bet you that Colangelo wont make the same mistake and hand DD a huge contract based on half a season’s improvement.

by McGateway on Dec 20, 2010 1:50 PM EST up reply actions  

nice o see some arguing my same points

… and with a better command of the language :)

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 1:20 PM EST up reply actions  

id like to add

That bargs is also the second leading scorer behind Dwight in the center position..and a lot of people always complained bout his rebounding numbers but since Reggie has gone down he is averaging 8 boards a game..so the man is the second leading scorer in the center position in the whole NBA and is averaging 8 boards and yet he still gets bash from time to time..even in the bobcat game people were saying he played horrible etc. Well pretty hard to play good when your suffering from a knee Injury..this season is all bout development with everybody on this roster let’s just sit back and try and enjoy the ride.

by sherwin316 on Dec 18, 2010 1:30 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Demar's got to continue improving his shooting

he’s my favorite player but he shot 5-16 from the field, he did start of the game with 7 points going 3-6 and i’d like to see him play like that throughout the whole game, at the end of the third quarter it seemed like he was just throwing up the ball hoping it would fall. I thought he was better defensively in my opinion. i did like that he kind of still tried to break out of struggling at the end, and sealed the game with that sickk dunk :)

by Andr K on Dec 18, 2010 1:36 PM EST reply actions  

it’s no way triano’s fault, but i think that he’s playing demar wrong, its just my opinion but he usually plays the entire first and third quarters and then comes in anywhere from the 6-4 minute mark in the 2nd and fourth quarter, i think that he should come out after like 8 minutes of playing and then go in earlier in the 2nd and 4th quarter so that he can run with the 2nd team and use the fast break with them more. whataya think?

by Andr K on Dec 18, 2010 1:39 PM EST up reply actions  

Until DeRozan can consistently knock down jump shots, he’s going to go through stretches of invisibility.

The scary thing is that DeRozan is shooting WORSE so far this year than last; 45% from the field vs 50%, and 10% from long range vs 25% last year.

As a result, teams play off him a lot, and that’s why the majority of his dunks are open ones off curls or wide open fast-break dunks. Opponents just don’t respect his shot so play off of him.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:38 PM EST up reply actions  

who cares about Andrea? This is way better

Hedo back in Orlando….. it is true there is one fool born every day….. hahahahahahha

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 2:49 PM EST reply actions  

I’m in shock that Turkoglu is on the verge of being traded for the second time in months. And to go back to a team that was happy to get rid of him in the first place? Unreal.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 18, 2010 5:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I’m stunned by this too…and the other aspects of the trades too! Rashard Lewis to Washington???

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:30 PM EST up reply actions  

hedo

It just screams desperation. Getting J rich for VC and Arenas for Lewis seemed smart but trading away Gortat & Pietrus for Hedo was most likely a mistake. I know it wasn’t a straight up trade like that, but really, why acquire Hedo and why give up Gortat. Should have avoided the Phoenix trade and just dumped Lewis for Agent 0 to give them what they lacked and give Arenas one last chance.

If I were Hedo I would treat this like my last chance in the NBA and he might actually be the player he once was (which isn’t that good btw). J Rich and his effort on both ends of the floor over the last two years is what gave Phoenix so much leverage on this trade. Which is dumb cause his contract expires this year and then all they have left is Hedo and his contract…hahaha

Bye bye Mr Howard

by defensive rap on Dec 19, 2010 4:13 AM EST up reply actions  

+1

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 9:22 AM EST up reply actions  

Bargs is not the problem...

I myself would prefer a defensive player who can board, block shots and protect the lane to play the centre spot. But that being said, Bargs is the only player on this team who has exceeded expectations and raised his game yoy.

For the 9 games in December he is averaging 22.6pts/7rebs/.89blks/4FTA/31% 3pts/52% 2pts

At the beginning of the season I said I would be happy if he could average 20+pts/8rebs/2blks per game. But beyond the numbers I’ve been impressed by how he has handled being the first option on offense, the craftyness with which he has broken down defences to create his own shots and how he has shown glimpses of being clutch. These have all beenn pleseant surprises to me. He will never be a good defensive centre and I accept that. And because of that he will never be a favourite player of mine but he is not the problem on this team.

The biggest disappointment on this team for me has been Demar. I don’t have the stats to back it up but his per minute production must be close to the worst amongst starting SGs in the league. Any improvement in his scoring has simply been the result of a 50% increase in his minutes yoy. There is no development of his game that I can see – still no midrange J, zero 3 pt range, no passing/playmaking, little in the way of rebounding, no steals and uninspiring defence. Alarmingly, the lack of playmaking, rebounding and steals/defense is the result of an inability to read plays as they develop and speaks to a low basketball IQ. Not good.

Most surprising to me is his inability to finish at the rim in traffic. The only time he actually finishes is on a wide open breakaway dunk/layup. I don’t understand this as he was touted as such a great athlete who could jump out of the gym when he was drafted. Although the window is far from closed on his development as a player his lack of actual basketball skills has me worried that we used a lottery pick on an athlete and not a basketball player.

Please prove me wrong Demar and I will happily eat these words.

On the flip side, I have been impressed by Barbosa and how he has bounced back from his wrist and shoulder injuries. He just looks like a player who knows what he is doing. His ability to drive to the rim and finish is huge on this team. As is his ability to stretch the D with his 3 point shooting. He never has that confused and/or ‘deer in the headlights’ look that is so common on Demar, Sonny, and Bargs. And his ability to turn up the defensive pressure from time to time is also much appreciated.

Finally, Amir’s foul issues are really starting to piss me off. Fix it.

by Tronix on Dec 18, 2010 2:58 PM EST reply actions  

One thing I never thought was in doubt

was Andrea being clutch, he has always shown that starting his first season and never stop. Other things about his game are up for debate, I never thought this one was in doubt.

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 3:03 PM EST up reply actions  

I would say you forgot speaking about JC in your post

having him back in old self is the second best surprise of the season..

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Agree about JC

Jose (who is also not a favourite player of mine) has been a huge surprise this year. Props to him for bouncing back from a brutal summer of trade talk and injuries. The only reason I didn’t mention it was that I was I tired of writing.

by Tronix on Dec 18, 2010 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Great comment

Just posted a similar rant above dealing with DeMar’s inability to finish in traffic, and shooting woes.

You’re right Tronix, there’s been nothing I’ve seen from DeMar this year that shouts “nice, he’s taking that next step,” or even “he’s about to take it!” Looking at his advanced stats from basketball reference, they’re ALL worse this year except turnovers. And ironically, looking at his “per game” numbers, they’re nearly all identical this year!

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:42 PM EST up reply actions  

i also agree

yea its all true, but its a huge transition of what demar is going through, last year he was the 5th option in an offense that included bosh and hedo. He’s now the 2nd or 3rd option and is playing a ton more minutes, for now his fg percentage is down, but when he gets more comfortable he’ll shape up, trust me.

by Andr K on Dec 18, 2010 11:40 PM EST up reply actions  

I hope so but looking at the advanced stats, there isn’t a HUGE difference in terms of shot attempts and usage etc…

My worry when he was drafted was that he just didn’t do anything that well in college, and that reminded me of prospects like Antoine Wright, Derrick Byars and Morris Almond…none of whom are still in the league.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 9:27 AM EST up reply actions  

big trade just went down

Off topic guys but a big trade just went down with Orlando, Washington and the suns…its crazy!!

by sherwin316 on Dec 18, 2010 4:17 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

I beated you

look up about Hedo going back to Orlando….

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 4:18 PM EST up reply actions  

there is a rumor of Jerald Wallace being on the block

is anybody in here still interested in trading for him? I am not sure about his age/contract but we do not have any project to develop at the 3 (DD and sonny are more 2s)

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 4:18 PM EST reply actions  

Count me among those who would LOVE to see Gerald Wallace in a Raptors uniform. And, oddly enough, he’s probably the exact type of strong rebounding SF you’d want in a frontcourt with Andrea Bargnani.

Make it happen, BC…

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 18, 2010 5:16 PM EST up reply actions  

point is

how much money does he make? I remember there was a talk about trading him for TJ fort, which means around 8 Mill. what are the options? Amir straight up? Barbosa straight up? Evans + some filler who makes a couple of M$? (who?)

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 5:53 PM EST up reply actions  

actually

Kleiza + Evans could make sense financially and give Charlotte some salary relief

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 5:54 PM EST up reply actions  

Kleiza and Evans for Wallace wouldn’t make me blink. In theory, there is also a trade exception floating around. A team like Utah used their exception to acquire Al Jefferson. I’d like to think Colangelo is planning to use the Raptors’ exception to acquire someone like Wallace.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 18, 2010 6:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Bargs for Wallace, straight up.

by untouchable_21 on Dec 18, 2010 6:17 PM EST up reply actions  

Love to see Wallace in a Raps uni too – come on BC, get in on the action!

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 6:45 PM EST up reply actions  

ha ha

sorry do not bite on that…..

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 8:08 PM EST up reply actions  

I'd like to hear from capologists but

I believe using the exception now on Wallace would put the team over the tax so I am doubtful that would be the preferred way

by renato on Dec 18, 2010 8:07 PM EST up reply actions  

The Raptors are currently about 3.8 million under the luxury tax thresh-hold, so yes using the TPE on GWallace who makes nearly ten million would put them into the tax for this year.

They would have to pay dollar for dollar on the amount that they go over. However, the season is bout 1/3 done so it would only cost them about 4 million in extra tax dollars.

Note the Raptors would still be well under the luxury tax amount next year if they were to add GWallace via the TPE.

All that said, I do not think the Cats would trade him for the TPE since I think they are trying to compete now.

by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 18, 2010 8:31 PM EST up reply actions  

Nice work capologist ShootersRUS.

So really, the TPE is a bit useless this year unless the team gets a talent they feel they can overpay for right now, knowing they’ll have space next season…

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 8:36 PM EST up reply actions  

I was actually in the middle of writing a little post on this.

by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 18, 2010 8:51 PM EST up reply actions  

I’d “overpay” to add Wallace on the wing. And like I said before, I think it’s actual an ideal move for a team that wants to feature Bargnani in the frontcourt.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 18, 2010 9:56 PM EST up reply actions  

Always thought this too – one of the reasons I was a fan of the Marion deal provided the Raptors kept him…

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 10:14 PM EST up reply actions  

I think it would be an excellent move

especially if BC can do it with Peja and/or the TPE without giving up much more.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 8:10 AM EST up reply actions  

Peja

Trade Demar, Sonny and Peja for Wallace and Matt Carroll.

Do it now. Wallace is a beast. Everything is a risk and Sonny and Demar may improve a tonne and become amazing players….and inthe best case scenario they would both be lucky to be close to as good as Wallace.

by defensive rap on Dec 19, 2010 4:20 AM EST up reply actions  

And I think Sonny and DeMar largely duplicate each other’s skill sets…I’d gladly part with one to get Wallace.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 9:28 AM EST up reply actions  

i knew arenas and Carter were the main part of the deal but...

Wow a lot of players got moved..Lewis, gortat earl Clark, hedo b

by sherwin316 on Dec 18, 2010 4:30 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

i knew arenas and Carter were the main part of the deal but...

Wow a lot of players got moved..Lewis, gortat earl Clark, hedo back with the magic ..j-rich, pietrus..wow

by sherwin316 on Dec 18, 2010 4:31 PM EST via mobile reply actions  

Today's Deals

Anyone else think the Magic panicked a bit? I mean Vince is Vince, but I’m not sure Richardson is a HUGE upgrade and not sure how having 3 bad defenders works with SVG and his D-first mentality. I don’t know…

Love it for Phoenix though.

As for the Wizards? Nothing to lose really in moving Agent Zero…

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 18, 2010 8:43 PM EST reply actions  

Definitely… They should have kept hedo in the first place, but I don’t see him as any kind of answer now. Though at least he will fit in their system

by axl t on Dec 19, 2010 9:48 AM EST via mobile up reply actions  

I think Phoenix wins this deal because a motivated VC is just as good as JRich and Gortat should be unleashed. However, Orlando did not have that much use for Gortat and VC was playing like crap, so they should be better.

Win-win in the present. Long term Phoenix wins for sure, best contracts and a pick.

by JumpShootersRUS on Dec 18, 2010 8:57 PM EST reply actions  

Since we can’t get off it, I might as well join.

.
What else is there to do, besides talk about Bargnani – inbetween some serious trades.

Reggie goes down in Boston
Post Reggie – Barg numbers:

  • Nov 28th vs Atlanta (L) 14 pts – 7 Rb – 0 Assists – .353 fg%
  • Dec 1st vs Wash (W) 18 pts – 8 Rb – 3 Assists – .615
  • Dec 3rd vs OKC (W) 26 pts – 12 Rb – 2 assists – .550
  • Dec 5th vs NYK (L) 16 pts – 7 Rb – 2 assists – .421
  • Dec 6th @ Ind. (L) 12 pts – 4 Rb – 1 assist – .455
  • Dec 8th @ NYK (L) 41 pts – 7 Rb – 6 assists – .667
  • Dec 10 vs Denver (L) 24 pts – 3 Rb – 3 assists – .412
  • Dec 11 @ Detroit (W) 22 pts – 5 Rb – 2 assists – .615
  • Dec 14 @ Charlotte (L) 12 pts – 8 Rb – 2 assists – .286
  • Dec 15 vs Chicago (L) – DNP (knee)
  • Dec 17th vs NJersey (W) 32 pts – 9 Rb – 2 assists – .538

10 games 21.7 ppg – 7.0 Rb – 2.3 apg – .500 fg%

The beauty of ample hindsight – is that you can understand trends & lapses in stats. Such as injuries, and how they impact.

It’s been argued a lot, some time over and over again, that Andrea is not consistent. And while I’m not sure what defines consistent, I do believe the past 10 games (that AB has played) – post Reggie – have been fairly consistent. Toss out the Charlotte "my knees hurt" game and you have 2 matches where Andrea scores less than 15. Andrea’s rebounding (on the AB scale) has been pretty decent. We all want it to be better – who doesn’t – however, it’s not a pressing need.

  • Toronto is 13th in Rebounding (post-Reggie), compared to 24th all last season.
  • Toronto is 4th in Offensive rebounding (post-Reggie) – 26th last season.

Bargnani’s assists are tracking higher (2.3) vs last year’s 1.2 – when he had someone he could pass to, that actually scored more than 13 points a game – aka … this year’s # 2 guy. Be curious to know his number of "hockey assists".
.
Also, beside Charlotte (where Bargnani did not practice), his lowest fg% of .353 was the only game below .400. If there is any inconsistency, it’s not getting more .600+ scores (3 out of 10).
.

by RapthoseLeafs on Dec 18, 2010 9:08 PM EST reply actions  

its about the swings

not what the raw numbers average out to. Its also about HOW he goes about getting those numbers. His effort, how hard he’s working, what he is doing on offense etc.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 7:48 AM EST up reply actions  

Re Bargnani the Raptors leading and only consistent scorer.

Don’t know if anyone saw this quote from Brook Lopez of the Nets re “The Magician”

“Every game I have played against him he has gotten better. He’s a fantastic player, and is always a great challenge for me. Obviously he is a knock down shooter. and he plays very well off of that. You have to respect his shot, he pump fakes, puts it on the floor & gets to the basket. He is playing more in the post too. He is doing a fantastic job.”

Comments after the Nets ( who are the 16th best defensive team at 98 points allowed) but 29th offensive team at 92 points scored, lost to the Raptors who are the 25th ranked defensive team and 9th ranked offensive team by 98-92 Saturday.
The reason the game was close in the first half was the Raptors could not make a shot, shooting only 39% till the last couple of shots brought it to 40%. They shot 58% in the 4th to Nets 35%, all you need to know.

Forget all the stupid garbage you read by know it all bloggers and fans and listen to someone who competes on the court with Andrea.

by Johnn19 on Dec 18, 2010 10:24 PM EST reply actions  

yeah

wonder what Nazr Mohammed thought of him… or GS Warriors? Maybe you can re-read Franchise’s post on that.

What I would give to be a fly on the wall in the opposing teams locker room pre-game. To hear what the coaches/staff/players tell their team(mates) to do against the Raps/Bargs. That would be a real indicator of what his ‘peers’ think of him.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 7:54 AM EST up reply actions  

good

which is why you do averages, possibly all tise opinions are equally wrong (and equally right)

by renato on Dec 19, 2010 8:13 AM EST up reply actions  

don't mean to be rude

but I’m not quite sure what you are getting at.

If you wanted to get the ‘true average’ opinion of people it would have to be ‘secret’ and independant. Thats why I think being able to listen in to coachs/staff/players in private would be an optimal way of getting Bargs peers opinion. Reality is that isn’t going to happen.

Thats why the comments that Franchise overheard the Warriors players saying seem pretty damning and concerning. Its not like they were expecting others (ie. fans or press) to listen to them. Yet they were (from my understanding) telling teammates to attack him because he wouldn’t be able to stop them. You don’t think that if players notice it, coaches and staff aren’t picking up on it to? Then inturn try to exploit any weakness they can?

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 9:24 AM EST up reply actions  

what I mean is

if one thinks you are a genius and another one think you are dumb, you are probably a normal person and the two, judging are equally true and equally wrong. In other words, take everybody opinion with a pinch of salt. And no, I do not mean to be rude either….

by renato on Dec 19, 2010 9:46 AM EST up reply actions  

Johnn – I was also privy to discussions from the Golden State Warriors bench when I sat 4 feet away from them earlier this season. They all played against Bargs and kept urging their teammates to take it right at Andrea in the paint because he “couldn’t do sh#t to stop them.”

No one’s denying Andrea’s offensive talents, and I’ve been singing his praises in terms of development of late. But he’s got a lonnnng ways to go before earning respect at the other end of the court.

Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com

by Adam Francis on Dec 19, 2010 9:31 AM EST up reply actions  

johnn19

I feel for you guy but it is probably best to not play into the Bargnani discussions. I get sucked into it all the time myself. Bargs for these guys is just someone they can stand. All your efforts to convince will be met with some kind of rebutal. They see us (supporters) as blind to his deficencies.
It really boils down to opinion. The haters put huge onus on the areas where he is lacking in defense. They see that as all important and nothing he does on the offensive end comes close to compensating for his defensive woes. They see defense as 80% + of a player’s worth. Nothing you say will change that. It is a matter of opinion and philosophy.

by raptball on Dec 19, 2010 9:49 AM EST reply actions  

this is simply not true

“someone they can’t stand” – I just can’t stand how he doesn’t try consistently. That he doesn’t put any sort of regular effort into his game. That he stands around watching. That doesn’t mean I don’t think he can’t be good or don’t see him as a potential valuable asset to this team… but rather he hasn’t shown the willingness to do it regularily. After 5 years there is no reason to believe he will start doing it (and again not that I believe he can’t). I guarantee if he does you won’t hear boo out of me about him if he throws out a stinker every now and again.

“see us as blind to his deficencies” – oh we know you see them (most of the time) how can you not. Its just that some seem to not even care. That he puts up good numbers, plays horrible at the other end, yet still the Raps still lose the game and all thats talked about is how great a game Bargs had and how many points he scored.

“They see defense as 80% + of a player’s worth” – not at all. Everyone knows that to win you need to outscore your opponents. But you are right that I don’t think that generally what he does on offense compensates for what he lacks defensively. Besides that, you can’t guarantee scoring every night but you can guarantee effort/hard work every night… and you don’t even have to be talented to do it. On top of that, defense wins championships… simple as that. There is a ton of evidence to support that. That shouldn’t even need to be part of any debate.

“It is a matter of opinion and philosophy” – in part yes… but it can be supported with evidence. This goes back to your “blind to his deficiencies” comment. Some are simply unwilling to acknowledge the evidence when its presented no matter what the format. When there are numerous forms of evidence that lead to a similar conclusion there is some level of truth to it, no matter how much one wants to ignore, criticize or debate the forms of evidence. Every time something is presented that says Bargs is ‘overrated’ (and I’m being nice here).. its thrown aside because there is something wrong with it, he has an excuse for it, or its his teammates fault.

Now I can’t speak for everyone that is classified as a “hater” but I think this is pretty close to what most “haters” think. No one wants Bargs to play poorly or want to ‘turn’ you against him. Its not that other players aren’t lacking either or its all on Bargs. Its simply not wanting Bargs, as long as he is going to be here, to play the way he does while still being a serious part of the puzzle (usage, minutes, position etc). Its simply not going to lead to any serious success, and is simply cutting into other players who could (although not necessarily will) help the team more in the long run. If he can consistently put in effort on D and on the boards… its the exact opposite.

by Not so Friendly Stranger on Dec 19, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

I disagree, sorta

But I respect the way you put it and defence does win championships.

My point with Andrea is that he has improved the most and is the best player on the team. He is flawed to be sure and the most important point you raised is he doesn’t put forth a full effort on D. I am a supporter of Andrea, but I can’t argue this point and it is most frustrating because although Andrea has improved each year, the easiest thing to improve upon is to simply try harder on D, and he has only improved marginally in this regard. He has done the hard physical work to improve his offence, improve his shot, get bigger and stronger…but he hasn’t learned to bust his ass on D and it would be a lot easier to support him if he gave a few hard fouls and got after it on D instead of stepping aside for people who drive the lane against him.

I can’t write him off yet and I actually believe we need to play him a lot and he either gets it or he doesn’t. If his offensive stats remain strong, eventually we can trade him for something valuable, which is most likely. If he does improve his D, we can keep him. Either way, it seems that his stock is rising and it just started to do so. We should wait and see what happens.

by defensive rap on Dec 20, 2010 11:24 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

RaptorsHQ is a growing, interactive community committed to providing the best Raptors and Canadian basketball content on the web.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
Raptors and the Summer of 2013
Small
All Things Tanking Pt.2
Small
All Things Tanking  Pt.1
Small
The Jared Sullinger Project
Small
The Disturbing Parallels of Briyan Burkeangelo
Small
Who kidnapped James Johnson & replaced him with this guy?
In_rainbows_small
I am concerned; I think fans should be concerned.
Tfc_academy_small
Andrea Bargnani Interview
Small
Ed Davis and how he defines the Raps future
Small
Fan Perspective: Demar Derozan

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

2009_0503draft09-20006_-_williams_solo_small Adam Francis

Basketball_20gym_20in_20sun2009-01-27-1233091216_small RaptorsHQ - Howland

Editors

Viciousd_2005-01-20_small Raptors HQ - Vicious D

Authors

Burgundy_small RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance

Img_0813_small rbala