3 in the Key - Game-Day Preview vs. Rockets
Home sweet home. The Raptors make it back from their recent string of back-to-backs with a 2-2 record, which bodes well as the Raptors will now come into a nice little home stand over the next few weeks. First up are the Houston Rockets who are also beginning the season with a paltry three wins.
I'm pretty torn about this recent road trip.
On the one hand, the Raptors came out and played their butts off against the Magic and Heat and came out with a split. Yet, in their second back to back, the Raptors were stagnant, lethargic and were able to barely come out with a split on the tail end.
As a Raptor fan, it's gotta leave you scratching your head.
However, maybe it's not too confusing. It was back at a Jack Astor's a couple weekends ago where we had our Raptors HQ meeting, and both Ray Bala and Howland both asked me at various times of the night what I thought was needed to improve this Raptors team.
Without hesitation, I said a few key injuries.
There's been a tendency in the Colangelo era to hesitate to play certain younger energy role players, especially since Jay Triano took over. Remember, it was last year that Sonny Weems finally got the burn we were asking for after Hedo Turkoglu went down with an injury.
And lo and behold, a couple injuries/illnesses later, Jay Triano was forced to change up his lineup and we got a little more youth and explosiveness in exchange for methodical and experienced players. Guys like Julian Wright and Joey Dorsey came in and played up to the competition in Florida. They also brought in a hunger to show off what they were capable of.
Maybe even more importantly, Jay Triano was forced to move Weems into the starting lineup in place of an injured Linas Kleiza.
A couple days later, some people recover from sickness and injuries and the Raptors start losing some of their edge and aggressiveness against Washington and the 76ers.
Now granted, we had a pretty small sample size to work with, but at the same time, it has got to give you pause for thought.
When the Raptors played guys like Wright and Dorsey, the Dinos really reminded me of the Hawks of several years ago; raw to a fault at times, but still working hard and creating excitement by forcing the play to their opponents. Young and exuberant, our team was full of energy throughout the entire playing roster with our point guards providing the steady hand to guide everyone.
And to me, it's giving me pause and causing me to revisit a question I posed earlier in the season.
After all, what's the overall goal of this year's Raptors?
If it's to secure wins, I'm not sure the Raptors would have won against the Magic had both David Andersen and Linas Kleiza. I certainly am not sure they really added anything to the Wizards or 76ers games.
If it's for player development, then the Raptors certainly aren't doing that since Julian Wright and Joey Dorsey are the younger, more untapped resources of talent who have a larger upside.
If it's to play with aggression and a chip on their shoulder, I think this Raptors team was far more aggressive with Wright and Dorsey in the lineup than without.
Once again though, the sample size is just too small for me to fully advocate a change. Nevertheless, there has to be some thought that goes into the notion of player development in a rebuilding phase like we've having in Toronto. There has to be at least a little consideration for what the Raptors did without Andersen and Kleiza in the lineup because heck, it was entertaining basketball. If Triano is going to be true to his pre-season words that he wants this team to be known as a fighter, I'm sure he's considering lineup changes if things continue to be stagnant.
Against Houston though, the Raptors have an opponent that matches them with their need to play "team ball".
Without Yao Ming or Aaron Brooks, and Chase Budinger listed as a possible return for tonight's game, the Raptors will be facing a Rockets team that has struggled of late and started off with a 3-8 record coming off a tough loss against the Thunder on Wednesday. The Rockets therefore are hungry for a win having lost their last two games and still trying to get their team firing on all cylinders. Here are the keys to a Raptors victory:
1) Win the Possession Battle - The Raptors are not exactly a top percentage shooting team. Currently, they sit 24th in the NBA with a 44.5% shooting percentage while they have allowed their opponents to shoot at a 47.9% shooting percentage. Houston isn't fairing that much better at 19th but they are holding their opponents to a lower shooting percentage (45.2%).
For our Raptors to come out on top, it's going to mean that they need more possessions and it's going to come in a few ways. First, they have to take care of the ball. It's been pretty ugly as the worst three turnover culprits are Jarrett Jack, Andrea Bargnani, and a surprising Linas Kleiza. All three players touch the ball a lot and end up wasting valuable possessions that that have been fought for with tenacious defense and key rebounding. The Rockets are a more experienced team than the 76ers and the Raptors cannot expect the Rockets to bail out our home team with sloppy play on their end.
2) Key in on Kevin Martin - I know Luis Scola is going to get his points for the Rockets having shot over 50% from the field so far in the season. However, Kevin Martin has been pretty inconsistent over his career. As a volume shooter and a person with a tendency to cough up the ball (2nd on the team with 2.8 TOs per game this year) the Raptors need to stick to him.
Sagging off of Kevin Martin can't be allowed as he's a fairly effective 3-point shooter and the Raptors definitely need to keep Martin from chewing them up from the charity stripe. It's therefore going to be extremely important to get DeMar DeRozan to buy into keeping a tight hold on Martin and Jay Triano should not be gun shy about putting Weems or Julian Wright in for DeRozan if he allows Martin to get away with murder.
3) Team Play vs Team Play - Let's face it. We shouldn't be expecting a heck of a lot of nights where Sonny Weems and Andrea Bargnani combine for over half of the Raptors points. It'd be sheer folly to expect that kind of production on a nightly basis. The Raptors really need consistent production from about 4-5 players in order to win most games and it's basically the same on Houston's side.
The key therefore has to be how both teams establish their rhythms and how each team can disrupt the other team's rhythm by forcing turnovers and contesting shots. With essential glue guys like Shane Battier and Luis Scola, the Raptors may have their hands full as Houston's been at it a lot longer than they have.
However, the Raptors themselves have managed to surprise a lot of teams by being the hungry fighter looking to prove something. They've been better than Houston in rebounding differential and steals differential which can bode well for them if they remain aggressive. At home, I'm expecting no less than a complete team effort, the likes of which we haven't seen since Saturday's loss in Miami.
While Houston isn't a top tiered team in the NBA without Yao Ming, they are still a dangerous team which has the potential to surprise people. Thing is, the Raptors are also trying to forge a similar identity.
This upcoming home stand is going tell us a lot about the Raptors as we'll see if they can continue to build an identity and if they can continue to show the same energy that was displayed for the majority of this season. Otherwise, I fully expect wholesale changes to be coming.
Because while Toronto fans hate losing, they really can't stand a team that doesn't show any fight in them.
43 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
How much longer till the Carlisimo era?
I have grown tired of Jay Triano. He has done a poor job of coaching the team and his immaturity is showing. As Franchise stated, there always has to be an unforseen injury to the starting lineup that forces him to make changes. JT is unwilling to create necessary competition for positions that are already predetermined by himself (and probably BC). Grant it, Klieza was signed by the Raptors in the off-season, but has his play on the court warrented extended minutes? Prior to Klieza coming back Dorsey and Wright had been playing with intensity and commitment on defense. Why the hell wouldn’t you go with what works? JT has a tendency to swap defensive lineups for offensive lineups and vise-versa. That philosophy may work in a college setting, but it totally messes with players developing any sort of chemistry. Also, I don’t mind David Anderson, but I don’t want to see him on the floor when the game is on the line. The combination of David and Andrea on the floor scares the crap out of me because they are the exact same player with no rebounding capacity. The worst facet to JT’s coaching style is that it is very predictable and simplistic.
Carlisimo may be waiting in the wings to takeover the Raptor coaching duties. Regardless, the Raptors need a coaching with a personality and won’t be intimidated by players and management. JT is wayyyyy too stubborn.
I like what Jay has done
The effort has been there most nights.
He is looking a lot more comfotrable out there.
His job is safe.
re Carlissimo
THERE WILL BE NO ERA for him,as he is an excelent assistant, nothing more. Triano will not be measured by wins and losses, but by improvement of key assets, and growth in the important areas of consistent effort and improved defensive commitment , and TEAM competitiveness in games..
Actually Vicious D wrote this one ha ha but he raises a really scary point.
Why are the Raptors’ personnel decisions so dictated by who’s available on a given night, and not on who SHOULD be playing? i never really thought of this but yeah, had Kleiza not gotten hurt, there’s no way we’d see Weems getting the minutes he’s now getting! I mean it took about 2/3rds of the season last year for them to kick Hedo to the bench!
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 11:01 AM EST up reply actions
Was laughing at that this morning…great stuff.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 3:54 PM EST up reply actions
A little hard on the Philly win
It was the last of a 4 game road trip that we actualy came out of 2 and 2.
Not easy to determine what the teams goals are or should be. I think the organization has to say playoffs and Triano has gotta coach to win.
Fans are probably split. Going into the season my goals were similiar to yours, seeing how Bargnani handles being the #1 scoring option, and the developement of DeRozan, Johnson and Davis. And getting the lowest pick possible.
A dozen or so games in find myself adding Weems, Wright and Dorsey to that list.that I wanna see given an opportunity. That could make Kleiza and Evans on the market. With one of our sure to be traded PG’s? Throw in our trade exception and all of a sudden we got some decent assets that some teams will want.
This team has an opportunity to keep some good young talent, market the above players for more young talent, albeit at the cost of a few W’s, and snag a decent draft pick all the while playing an agressive game of basketball.
No, I know I was being a bit harsh, but the Washington game was inexcusable and the Philly one, while a win, was not what I wanted to see from this Raptors team.
But yes, that’s a summary of my point. I think our thoughts should be to develop youth
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on Nov 19, 2010 5:00 PM EST up reply actions
I remember when firing Smitch was going to turn the Raptors around…
I remember when firing Kevin O’Neal was going to turn the Raptors around…
I remember when firing Rob Babcock was going to turn the Raptors around…
I remember when firing Lenny Wilkins was going to turn the Raptors around…
I remember when firing Glen Grunwald was going to turn the Raptors around…
I remember when firing Butch Carter was going to turn the Raptors around…
I remember when firing Darrell Walker was going to turn the Raptors around…
I remember when firing Isiah Thomas was going to turn the Raptors around…
Should have kept Brendan Malone.
lol.
I love Brendan Malone. I love Butch Carter too. I also like Jay Triano. I know that it’s early, but after the last two games, I thought I had to bring the point up.
And no, I’m not asking to fire Triano.
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on Nov 19, 2010 5:01 PM EST up reply actions
Can I also recommend, for any stat heads, a must read is “Fooled by Randomness: The Hidden Role of Chance in Life and in the Markets” a book written by Nassim Nicholas Taleb about the fallibility of human knowledge.
The book was selected by Fortune as one of the 75 “Smartest Books of All Time.”
Taleb sets forth the idea that modern humans are often unaware of the existence of randomness. They tend to explain random outcomes as non-random.
I’m sure I posted this before… but if you’re a wages of win guy, you’ll enjoy Malcolm Gladwell’s article on it: http://www.gladwell.com/2006/2006_05_29_a_game.html
Awesome read – thanks for the link Ustation.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 11:02 AM EST up reply actions
Thanks ustation
Gladwell is a genious (his books are a must read: Blink, Tipping Point and Outliers).
If you are a Bargnani booster and feel you don’t have a good grasp of the Wins Score and what it means in terms of determining a player’s value, then please read this article. Then think long and hard about Bargnani’s statistics/value… and then take a long hard look in the mirror (OK that last one was a joke)
It's a nice article
But I’m never going to fully buy into Wages of Wins or other advanced basketball analysis until they start factoring quality of competition and quality of teammates. The hockey statheads have been doing that for years already.
When Bargnani gets two rebounds and the Raptors convincingly out-rebound their opponents, I’m not worried about his rebounding efforts. When he gets seven rebounds and the Raptors get hammered on the glass, I wonder if he’s doing enough (and he often isn’t). WoW just likes seven more than two.
I've been looking at the sky
by Back In Black on Nov 19, 2010 11:55 AM EST up reply actions
Total Energy Allocation
Thought about this last night and it conveniently fits into this thread. Is Bargnani serving his team as best he can by focusing on scoring, given that other players simply lack the necessary skill to score as effectively? This should allow players to help the team by doing what they know how to do best (i.e. Reggie rebounding).
Assuming the ideal scenario where Bargs had the rebounding and defensive instincts so many pine for, If other players were asked to score more so as to lift the burden from Bargs so that he might have more energy available to devote to the rebounding and defense, would the team be better served considering their collection of talents?
Interesting that the primary focus was Iverson and the 76ers. In those years they made their runs deep into the playoffs are people suggesting that Iverson did not contribute to their maximizing their collective situation by playing the way he played? Did Iverson optimize his total energy allocation thus allowing his teammates to perform in ways that allowed the team to maximize their COLLECTIVE potential?
Baseball lends itself to Money Ball analysis because, as mentioned, it is a sequence of individual interactions. Basketball not so much.
And consider this – tonight’s opponent was put together by what many consider the primary disciple of the application of advanced stats to basketball. I haven’t seen them play so I can’t pass judgment but the record is not impressive.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
by HQ Interloper on Nov 19, 2010 2:43 PM EST up reply actions
Interesting thoughts...
I would suggest thought that the premis of this argument is that Bargnani is making an active decision to focus on scoring and to somehow conserve his energy by not putting any effort into defence and rebouning. I highly doubt that is the case. it’s more a case of Bagnani CAN’T rebound or defend. I would also argue that it is not an either/or equation. For example defence and rebounding vs. offence is not a zero sum game. Many, many players do both. Bargnani, to not hurt his team has to play offense AND defend and rebound. I can’t immagine a coach would say to a player “OK just go out there and play 50% of the game and ignore everything else because that makes us better”. That just sounds ridiculous. In fact it hurts his team, for example the Raptors are forced to play the one dimensional Regie Evans to cover up the gaping hole that Bargnani leaves in the rebounding department.
Actually
Assuming the ideal scenario where Bargs had the rebounding and defensive instincts so many pine for, If other players were asked to score more so as to lift the burden from Bargs so that he might have more energy available to devote to the rebounding and defense, would the team be better served considering their current collection of talents?
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
by HQ Interloper on Nov 19, 2010 3:07 PM EST up reply actions
Didn’t see Bargs devote energy to the rebounding and defense last year
That’s all good but what about last year with Bosh? Bosh was the primary scorer. Bargs wasn’t any better rebounding or defending, he could have focused more on those areas with Bosh putting up 24pt a game.
Here's the thing
It is difficult to embark on a rebuild year when the coach doesn’t have the security of a long term contract. You are setting up a situation of opposing goals from the very start. Jay Triano wants to win, his career prospects as an NBA head coach depend on this. He’s also more stubborn than I expected, but I’ve touched on this before.
If he had the security of three or four more years, then yeah, it would make sense to run Julian Wright out there at every opportunity. A three man wing rotation of Weems, DeRozan, and Wright would be the most ideal for this team longterm, from a development standpoint, especially since contract decisions have to be made on Wright and Weems.
The difference between the Raptors and Hawks situations is that Mike Woodson probably had more job security given the uncertain ownership situation.
Triano’s is in a position of having the job he has probably aspired to for the longest time. His motivations are to prove himself as a person who belongs in the coaching ranks and the way he can achieve that is by winning, even at the expense of the long term goals of the organization.
The stomach for the long, hard build doesn’t exist with the organization and the dwindling attendance numbers might justify this. If there was a 100% committment to the rebuild:
a) You would have committed to giving Alabi minutes over Anderson
b) Kleiza would not have been signed in the offseason as you looked to see what you had in Weems and Wright (but not sure about the timing of the transactions)
But again, we might be jumping to conclusions too early. If Dec 15th comes by and the decision is made to start culling the roster by moving the extra pieces like Anderson, Kleiza, Barbosa, Evans, and even Jack, you might be getting your wish.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
It is difficult to embark on a rebuild year when the coach doesn’t have the security of a long term contract. You are setting up a situation of opposing goals from the very start. Jay Triano wants to win, his career prospects as an NBA head coach depend on this.
Very good point.
I think that’s one of the major issues with this franchise in a nutshell too…team trying to take a step or two back so they can get a lottery pick to eventually take some giant leaps forward, yet faced with having to take mini steps forward now thanks to fan, media and financial pressure.
Which will result of course in the team going nowhere long term.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 11:06 AM EST up reply actions
This whole issue frustrates me...
If BC, MLSE and Triano would stop patronizing fans and be open and honest by declaring we are in a rebuild mode, they could actively start selling hope (as they can’t sell wins). I’m sure the market/fans would buy into this. Instead, BC signs a player who was wasn’t even in the league last year, trades for another jump shooting centre that shouldn’t be in the league this year, promotes a player who has been statitically (based on WoW stats) one of the worst players in the league to the “franchise player” status and tries to tell fans the Raptors will challange for a playoff spot. Any intelligent fan would have looked at the roster and felt insulted!
Scary Thought
This probably deserves a full blog post at some point but how many years removed from the playoffs is this team? 2? 3? 5?
In all seriousness this draft class doesn’t have a Durant or LeBron type in it; more like Brands and OJ Mayos. So you need a couple rounds of getting guys like this to keep moving forward.
But that’s just the start.
As we’ve seen from teams like Minny, the Clips and Kings, those high picks don’t always work out, and even when they do, by the time the first pick in say a succession of 3 or 4 is ready to have a big impact on the team, it’s nearly free agency time and you’ve gotta keep him somehow.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 4:47 PM EST up reply actions
Kevin Martin
a volume shooter? That’s one efficient player, the man can take 9 shots and end up with 23 points in any given game. After Yao gets back he could potentially join the 50 (fg%), 40 (3 fg%), 90 (ft%) club with Nash. Melo is averaging 18.8 attempts (24.4 pts/game), Kobe takes 19.7 (26.3 pts/game), Durant takes 21.6 (28 pts/game); Martin? 11.8 attempts (23.1 pts/game). If you want the win, gotta keep him from finding driving lanes and getting to the line where the man is simply deadly. Running the floor will cause Houston trouble with their starting lineup and running the half court with their bench ruins their fluidity.
Think Vicious D meant volume in that Martin is such a focal point on offense…but yes, he’s a very efficient shooter…have him in fantasy. Hopefully DeRozan’s ready to chase him around tonight.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 11:03 AM EST up reply actions
True – he is no volume chucker, but he is a high-usage guy and very key to their offense. Can’t let him do what he wants.
by dhackett1565 on Nov 19, 2010 11:15 AM EST up reply actions
Triano's fault?
Triano isn’t the greatest coach in the league… but he’s also no where near the worst. Sure his rotations seem to be dictated by some kind of formula like a rec league coach but that might be BC’s influence.
Instead of talking about the end of the Triano era I think we need to talk about BC… he’s the one ultimately responsible.
I’ll leave it to Bill SImmons to sum up our GM situation:
Reason No. 14,728 I love the NBA: Colangelo had a choice between paying Beasley $11 million for two years (with a qualifying offer of $8.1 million in 2012-13) or signing Amir Johnson for $34 million for five years … and chose Johnson!? Did he suffer a head injury right before the 2006 draft and not tell us? I’m dumping Kahn for Colangelo as this season’s GM Whipping Boy. He didn’t just ruin the Raptors these past four years; he shoved them down the stairs, beat them to death with a baseball bat and buried them in a sanitation site.
Where would Beasley Play
I would suggest that the team should be very satisfied giving Weems the minutes he’s getting at the 3 this year over possibly having to give Beasley those minutes. This is one of those ‘RIGHT NOW" perspectives, but it wouldn’t be irrational to suggest that had Triano started Amir with Bargs in pre-season and established that as the front court that the investment in Amir would be paying off nicely. And conveniently this fits into the advanced metric discussion above. We’re willing to roast BC for signing Amir but advanced metrics say Amir is likely the best player on the team and possibly one of the best players at his position in the league.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
by HQ Interloper on Nov 19, 2010 3:04 PM EST up reply actions
Not really the point...
You accumulate assets. What has BC brought in his 4 years? How many true starters has he brought to the organization? He’s built an amazing bench… I’ll give him that much… but having a team made up of bench players is a failure.
I’m using the quote to advocate for Beasley. I don’t even want to argue Beasley as a player. Or Amir (who I think is playing quite well)… it’s more that the last line of Simmons hyperbole…
He didn’t just ruin the Raptors these past four years; he shoved them down the stairs, beat them to death with a baseball bat and buried them in a sanitation site.
The Raptors may not lose the most games this year… but it’s hard to find a team with a bleaker 5 year outlook.
That’s the point being made. Forget Beasley.
by lessthanzero on Nov 19, 2010 3:11 PM EST up reply actions
Sorry...
I’m NOT advocating for Beasley. Forget the name… look at it as an asset lost.
by lessthanzero on Nov 19, 2010 3:13 PM EST up reply actions
Love this point lessthanzero – going to have a whole blog topic on it at some point.
I got killed for beating the “Colangelo has failed” drum last year but I still don’t see how you can say he hasn’t.
ESPN Radio yesterday was calling the Raptors the worst team in the league talent-wise, with Minny not even being a close second…
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 4:49 PM EST up reply actions
Also...
Beasley is a 3/4. Weems is a 2/3. In actuality, you’d essentially be swapping Kleiza for Beasley which would leave Weems in exactly the same situation he’s in now… which is battling Derozan for the starting SG spot! And I think it would be a better question to ask what a wing pair of Weems and Beasley could do rather than say the Raps should be satisfied with Weems… who conveniently is also a “RIGHT NOW” perspective.
The door swings two ways.
by lessthanzero on Nov 19, 2010 3:30 PM EST up reply actions
Formulaic
Anyone know the formula for wins produced? I found win score but not wins produced?
Check out the wages of wins site – think there’s a breakdown there. It’s pretty complex.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Nov 19, 2010 4:50 PM EST up reply actions
Take a step back and look at what's been built...
Starting Point Guard
Jose when he is on his game is a VERY capable PG. There is a reason people were talking about his being slighted as an All-Star. If he gets himself re-aligned, he is a keeper and was a fantastic acquisition.
Starting 2-Guard
Demar looks like he is well on his way to reaching the potential that was seen when he was acquired. One, two more years at the most, he is a top tier SG if he keeps working and listening to trainers and coaches.
Starting Small Forward
Sonny Weems bore the brunt of my frustration in the pre-season and into the first 2-3 games of the season because he seemed to think that his Summer League performance (against scrubs and tryouts) was going to seamlessly transition against real NBA talent. He is starting to surprise me and make me bite my tongue as it looks like he too may be actually willing to adjust his game and work his butt off. With his head on straight he is easily a starter quality 2/3, leaning towards above average. Here is some research material he should study ( http://sports.yahoo.com/nba/blog/ball_dont_lie/post/Video-Scottie-Pippen-s-brilliance;ylt=AkOBmYlesO.Df1qudf_gQ.8vLYF?urn=nba-287399 ) This guy looks to be an ABSOLUTE STEAL by Raptor’s management.
Starting Finesse Forward
Andrea Bargnani’s scoring profile is elite, PERIOD. He plays decent-to-above average defense on his own man. His length gets him some easy rebounds (granted, the only kind he seems to collect regularly). Yes, he fails miserably at help defense, but if you consider how little he asks for help on his own man, maybe the rest of the team should step up and return the favour. He will never be Pau Gasol. He isn’t Dirk Nowitzki. He IS HOWEVER definitely deserving of a starting role, quit confusing “Starter” with “All-Star”. Fault management for overpaying him granted, mistake made. He was still a great pickup and a valuable player.
Starting Center
This is my one position where I can say management has failed. Of course, Ed Davis might save their butts when he gets back in, but right now, we just don’t know that. He looks like he will be all right and if he gets a year or two leeway to judge him, I suspect he qualifies as a consensus starter on your average team, and he has potential to be an All-Star Center. Right now management gets a fail, but may get the last laugh.
On top of the successful starting roster they’ve built, consider a bench of Barbosa, Kleiza, Johnson, Wright, Evans. Decent talent, starters on lesser teams. Throw in the give or take guys who can contribute either on the court sometimes or in a trade upgrade, Jack has value, Dorsey may have a huge upside, pick up Anderson and beat Pau Gasol and Dwight Howard over the head with him (see? value). That’s a good bench.
If you take a step back, look at the things that were beyond their control, and seriously consider the work done to build this team; you can’t tell me management deserves to be burned at the stake. Where did Jose circa 2006/2007 go? Management didn’t put a voodoo hex on his shooting hand. They weren’t wrong, Jose changed. Besides, we have enough pieces ( and maybe a #1 lottery pick ) to upgrade if he stays washed up. The building blocks management have given us speak to a job well done, the players need to do their part.
That being said I do believe I have a solution to one of our key deficiencies. A HUGE Management FAIL. Denver’s issue of J.R. Smith not getting along with coach Karl. Let’s make a trade! For serious! Give me George Karl over Triano in a heartbeat! LOL
Raptor Nation will rise, mark my words.
Not in time for the Sonny vs Demar debate but...
Consider this:
Scottie Pippen Career
MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PPG
34.9 47.3 32.6 70.4 1.8 4.6 6.4 5.2 2.0 0.8 2.76 16.1
Sonny Weems 2010/2011 so far
MPG FG% 3p% FT% OFF DEF RPG APG SPG BPG TO PPG
26:18 53.1 42.9 80.6 0.6 1.8 2.5 2.1 0.8 0.1 1.6 14.1
So, he is working with 9 less minutes a game and with improvement on defense and rebounding, and with confidence in his teammates we have a future Hall of Famer…
Sonny shoots a better percentage inside and out. He turns the ball over less because he’s not passing as much so that’s a write off. But like I’ve said, he has the same canvas, he just needs to paint the right picture.

by 



























