Tip-In: Celtics Edge Raptors in Pre-Season Play
Even if it had been broadcast on the usual networks, this one wouldn't have been pretty to watch as Boston beat Toronto 91 to 87 using mostly scrubs...
So if the Toronto Raptors' thrashing of the Phoenix Suns in the team's first pre-season match was a sign of thing to come defensively, was last night's loss to Boston a sign of things to come at the other end of the court?
Fans who gathered around the radio or various online feeds saw/heard a Dino-squad that shot percentage points below 40% from the field on the night, hit only 16 of 27 free-throws, and put up only 39 points in the first half. The effort was there, but the ball just wasn't going down.
Luckily the Celtics had some issues of their own, including 22 turnovers which helped to keep things close, but it's admittedly hard to be too happy about much else in this one. The bottom line is that Toronto was leading late in the game, played four of their five starters in the final few minutes against Boston's scrubs, and yet still couldn't get the job done.
Oh, and by scrubs, I'm not even talking Nate Robinson and Delonte West, although both played big roles in the win. I'm talking Stephane Lasme, Luke Harangody and Von Wafer, guys who may not even make the team for Boston!
No, there wasn't a lot to smile about after this one, aside from there being some Raptors' action to watch in some format.
Andrea Bargnani was worse in this one than the last, DeMar DeRozan regressed to his first-year self, Amir Johnson was owned by 56 year old Jermaine O'Neal, Jose Calderon couldn't hit a shot and Joey Dorsey looked much more like a D Leaguer than someone competing for a top 8 spot with the Raps.
Bargs was the worst of the bunch though and between his horrific offensive display (1 of 8 for 4 points) and the rest of his game (as many turnovers as rebounds and a team-high minus 12 in 26 minutes), readers participating in last night's live-blog were calling for David Andersen over him.
Ugh.
The concerning thing though for me wasn't that Andrea only scored 4 points, it's that DeRozan, Weems, Jack and Barbosa all attempted more shots.
Yes, if your shot isn't falling, give up the rock, but watching Andrea closely last night you saw a player who was getting the ball in positions that weren't exactly ideal for scoring most of the time, nor did it look like he was comfortable knowing where his offence was going to come from.
I'm hoping therefore some of this malaise will work itself out as the team continues to play more games. Because if not, it's hard not to think that there's credence to the theory that instead of playing in Bosh's shadow, Chris actually made the game easier for Andrea.
And that's not good.
Toronto put up a ton of points against Phoenix but last night's game to me, pre-season or not, was what I expect the average Raptors' match to be like this coming season; the defence is decent enough for the team to hang around, but the club has trouble scoring enough to get the win.
And that's why it's crucial that "Il Mago" gets going.
The same can be said for some of the other Raptors like DeRozan and even Amir Johnson. These guys are expected to have major impacts on the court and as a whole that just didn't happen last night.
Of course the Boston Celtics themselves had something to do with this. The team's defence is always solid, and the bulk of the team has been together long enough that they simply go out and run their stuff. Even in limited minutes, KG, Ray Allen, Rajon Rondo and Paul Pierce were quite effective, and while they barely played in the second half, they pretty much did whatever they wanted in the first. (Boston shot over 50% from the field in the first half.)
On the plus side for Toronto, I thought Jarrett Jack did his best to keep the game close.
He only had one assist, but had 18 points and 6 boards, and led a nice late-game charge that saw the Raptors briefly snatch the lead from the Celts. Last game I thought that Linas Kleiza could be the team's best player night-in and night-out this year when all was said and done, but I'm wondering if Jack won't challenge for that title too. There's no question to me though that Jack should be this team's starting point guard, it's just a matter now of who Jay surrounds him with.
The biggest plus last night to me though was the play of Leandro Barbosa, who looked like his 2008 Phoenix self. He hit 7 of his 12 shots, including two 3's, and was generally in attack mode all night. He's one of the few players on this Raptor-team that can change the pace or feel of a game, and I'm hoping Triano uses him much like he did last night, as both a weapon in transition and the half-court, as well as a decoy once he got hot. The team is going to have to rely on Leandro's offense many a time this season I'm guessing, so it was good to see him get going in just his second game.
So was this a bit of a reality check type loss?
I'd lean towards yes, however this is the pre-season where Orlando can beat New Orleans 135 to 81, so again, let's not get too carried away.
But I think through two games we've seen some issues that look like they could be trends into the regular season.
Let's hope that some of the negatives ones like the play of Bargnani, end before the real games get going.
37 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Oh Bargs
As I’ve noted before, I’m a huge AB apologist, but even I am starting to lose faith. I didn’t catch any of the last two games, but from between reading what I’ve read and seeing the boxscore, as well as seeing Bargs put up some stinkers for the past 4 years, it’s not hard for me to envision what kind of game he had. At some point, Jay is going to have to do something to jolt him out of his listlessness and light a fire under his ass to start playing down low and playing with more heart, grit and determination. Enough of a 7 foot jump shooter, that just ain’t gonna cut it anymore.
On Bargs
Franchise called bargs play perfectly. I only watched the first half but boy did he ever look lost. Defensively he reminded me of a little kid. He can’t watch his man and the the ball at the same time. Most of the time his help defense is played with his back to the ball. In comparison, Anderson played with a sense of purpose. Does Bargnani even like basketball?
This team all of a sudden is athletic, quick and tenacious. I am not sure that Bargnani is a fit on this team. Its not that he can’t fit in i don’t think he wants to fit in. If he doesn’t change, they better move him or he will be a negative to the teams new culture.
by raptor rabid on Oct 11, 2010 11:20 AM EDT up reply actions
Does Bargnani even like basketball?
Honestly, I’ve asked myself the same question on numerous occasions.
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Oct 11, 2010 1:25 PM EDT up reply actions
I'm Confused
The article makes it sound like we looked like Phoenix the other night…..we lost by 4 on the road to a team many are picking to go to the finals again.
“Even in limited minutes, KG, Ray Allen, Rajon Rondo and Paul Pierce were quite effective, and while they barely played in the second half, they pretty much did whatever they wanted in the first.” ====> Boston’s starting five only played on average two less minutes than our projected starting 5 (I’m assuming Barg’s, Amir, Kleiza, DD, Jack). If they did pretty much whatever they wanted, why were they a combined -8 in plus/minus.
You criticize our D for giving up a high shooting percentage but give them no credit for creating turnovers. Can’t have it both ways.
I’m not saying we are the Celtics, or that there weren’t problems in the game. Given our recent history against the C’s and the expectations for this year, I’ll take yesterday’s result as another sign we can at least compete.
I think he is saying
that there were no positives, other than the play of Barbosa, to take away from last nights matchup.
Yeah we lost by four, but in the final quarter the Celtics were playing guys who probably won’t make the final cut.
Bargnani definately is not off to the start that I had hoped but not overly concerned. It has been two preseason games. Still would like to see him more active without the ball on offence.
no positives to take out of the game?
Derozan getting to the line 8 times
Jack and Barbosa
22 turnovers for Boston
solid, if unspectacular, defense.
don’t get me wrong… that isn’t exactly amazing, but I think there are still some positives.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Oct 11, 2010 11:08 AM EDT up reply actions
I listed all of those except DeRozan’s 8 free-throws…problem for me was that they were outweighed by the Raptors’ starters getting beat by the Celtics’ fringe D Leaguers.
The whole thing just didn’t sit well with me. This team needs to play with fire in every game and on every possession…that didn’t happen near the end of the game.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Oct 11, 2010 11:33 AM EDT up reply actions
Yes you did point those things out
BUT……90% of the article was negative and biased. If the Boston starters “pretty much did whatever they wanted” (which is laughable because their plus/minus was negative)and the Boston scrubs made our starters look bad, how was it a 4 point game.
Its going to be a long enough season as it is without every article being 90% focused on the negatives with a footnote for the positives. I’m not asking for sugar-coating…just balance.
"biased"
I’m puzzled by your comment that the article was negative and biased. You keep saying the Raptors only lost by 4 points, but you don’t say anything about the fact that they lost by 4 points to players who may not even make an NBA roster. He’s got a right to be negative (although he did mention several positive things), but why do you say he is biased?
Personally, I would include, among positive attributes, the fact that the majority of the Raptors played hard, if not well. For a team that will lose as many games as the Raptors most likely will, playing hard will go far in the eyes of Raptor fans.
Tim W.
The Picket Fence
Sorry but I do think there is a definite negative bias to this article. The Raptors are a team most expect to win fewer than 30 games. Yet they played the C’s hard and down to the wire.
Our D gets knocked for giving up a high percentage (fair criticism) but “luckily” Boston committed 22 turnovers…..maybe our D had something to do with that (negative bias).
The Boston starters "pretty much did whatever they wanted", yet when they were on the floor, we outscored them. If you are going to talk about not closing it out against the “scrubs”, then mention how well we played their starters.
Yes, its only preseason. But, if you had told me a week ago that we would blow Phoenix’s doors off and lose a close one on the road to Boston, I’d gladly take that. Not that there isn’t more work to do, but from this article, I get a sense that there is very little to feel good about in Raptorsland.
I definetely didn’t read it as there were no positives to take out of the game from your post… more a response to Tinmann reading that into it.
But, as I posted further down, while i know nothing of Lasme, Harangody and Erden, there no one else on that team I would even remotely call fringe D-Leaguers. Its also not like those three combined to do much against the Raps, other than play solid D (and one nice dunk)… which Boston always gets out of everyone.
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Oct 11, 2010 12:32 PM EDT up reply actions
I’m not sure what game people were watching but to me, even in pre-season, a line-up of Weems, DeRozan, Dorsey, Bargnani and Jack shouldn’t lose in crunch time to one consisting of Von Wafer, Stephane Lasme, Nate Robinson, Marquis Daniels and Semih Erden etc.
Am I blowing the rest of the game off?
No, Toronto fought to keep things close and eventually took the lead.
But I don’t care how you slice it…four of your six best players, players who are going to be counted on in crunch time, shouldn’t lose that game.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Oct 12, 2010 1:52 AM EDT up reply actions
And the fact Andrea didn’t look good in both games I still expect him to play better..people just have to be patient. He’s getting into a new role as being the number 1 option so he’s gonna see more double teams he’s not handle it well now but he’ll get use to it..he’s too talented to go 1-8 on a regular basis..Chris bosh didn’t handle double teams either when it first happened. Andrea does seem lost on offence a lot I saw the game last night and he looked more like a decoy than anything else and if that is the case the coaching staff better start calling plays to put Andrea in a position to score. I love jacks mentality to win but ur point guard should not be your leading scorer it has to be Andrea or DD.
by sherwin316 on Oct 11, 2010 10:58 AM EDT via mobile reply actions
a few things
“was last night’s loss to Boston a sign of things to come at the other end of the court?”
can’t be too tough on any team that has a poor offensive game when playing Boston. Thats what Boston does, what they are known for, is playing tough D… no matter who/what/when/where they play.
I’ll worry about the offense when its lacking over a period of time, against opponents that aren’t Boston. not that I think Toronto will have some potent offense… but lets concern ourselves with the offense when you are not playing one of (if not the) best defensive team in the league
“as Boston beat Toronto 91 to 87 using mostly scrubs…”
there are 3 players on Boston who’s name I do not recognize. Everyone else has been a starter in this league, atleast in recent history. (not sure if Wafer started for Houston, but I know he was a regular) Not that I would expect a ton out of Boston’s bench, but it is far superior to Phoenix’s. Really the minutes distribution (bench vs starters) isn’t that far off between the two teams.
“So was this a bit of a reality check type loss?”
how are we outside of reality before the season has even started? And people blame BC for building expectations to high and not living up to it…. maybe, just maybe, its just ourselves….
on a side note, I wonder how much discussion changes if the Raps shoot a reasonable percentage from the ft line (less than 60% is horrendous)
by Not so Friendly Stranger on Oct 11, 2010 11:03 AM EDT reply actions
I mentioned this last night…Boston is REALLY deep. They have guys at the 10-11 spot who would easily be 6th or 7th on any other team. Sure, a lot of their guys are older, but with that depth they won’t have to play big minutes. When you have guys like KG, Shaq, JO, Big Baby, and eventually Kendrick Perkins up front, and you have dudes like Von Wafer, Nate Rob and Marquis Daniels coming in behind Pierce, Allen and Rondo…I mean, wow! I know there are some solid young teams in the east, but do you REALLY want to play these guys come playoff time if they’re healthy?
by the stylin' assassin on Oct 11, 2010 12:08 PM EDT up reply actions
seriously
look at that front line. ANY ONE of them would start for us, and Boston is 5 deep. Ridiculous.
by the stylin' assassin on Oct 11, 2010 12:10 PM EDT up reply actions
The reality check was simply in reference to the over-exuberance I was seeing from fans and even some of the media after the Phoenix win…yes…long way to go.
Adam Francis - Publisher - RaptorsHQ.com
by Adam Francis on Oct 12, 2010 1:53 AM EDT up reply actions
This is a loooonggg season so keep it positive...
I think we need to temper our expectations with this group. I think we all agree that with the loss of Bosh, a number of new faces, new offensive and defensive systems and the overall lack and poor mix of talent this team will be in the bottom of the Eastern conference.
The only thing I am expecting them to do is compete. And last night they did just that on one of the toughest floors in the NBA.
I don’t care that it was pre-season or that the Celts played their scrubs in the 4th. The Raps competed and had a chance to win right up to the end. That is all that you can realistically hope for from this group this year.
This will be a long year with lots of losing. If the Raps hope to maintain a competitive edge Triano has to make sure the team remains positive and hopeful inspite of the losing. If he doesn’t they will throw in the towel by the 2nd quarter of every game and we will see the type of blowouts we saw in the first 3rd of last season.
With that in mind I will choose to ignore the fact that Bargs was totally disinterested and had brutal shooting & rebounding numbers to prove it. Instead, I will focus on the fact that JJ appears to have improved his game since last year and is ready to play, Barbosa appears to have regained his form from 08, the defensive energy was there and we forced 22 turnovers.
That is something the team can build on and hopefully carry over to the next game…. which of course they will probably lose.
I think what's happening with the analysis so far
Is the team has actually looked better than most had expected, even in pre-season, so the initial reaction is to discredit any perceived progress in overall play with caveats. Again, preseason back to back or no back to back, 51 point blowouts are a sign of something positive. Losing by 4 to Boston, in Boston, is a positive, considering our “best player” went 1 for 8, and shooting at the line was horrendous. The notion that this team might actually be decent hasn’t sunk in yet, especially for the segment that sees them as winning 20 something games.
What’s translated so far :
They turn teams over and they get to the line.
If Triano’s words are to be given any credit, they are three quarters of the way to implementing their defensive system – which has looked good so far, and only half way to putting in their offense.
Eventually reality will overtake preconceived notions of what this team is “supposed” to be and the recaps will have a more balanced tone to them.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
I like how this team gets after it on the defensive end, and the rebounding is much better. I won’t be mad at this team if they bring the effort and the young guys show progress.
by the stylin' assassin on Oct 11, 2010 12:12 PM EDT up reply actions
True
The best case scenario for this team should have nothing to do with the win total. I don’t think they’ll win less than 30 games but my ability to enjoy the season will have little to do with the actual number.
Going in, I’m framing my expectations along these lines:
1. Will the games be enjoyable to watch?
2. Will players progress individually and as a team so that I might feel positive about actually witnessing a sustained period of success of 4 or 5 years of high quality basketball from this team going forward
3. Are these the type of guys whose attitude toward the game and the way they play it on a nightly basis deserving of my respect and emotional investment as worthwhile representatives of the city I call home?
As a fan of the game, this would be a good season in my book.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
by HQ Interloper on Oct 11, 2010 12:24 PM EDT up reply actions
The team is not missing much to be consistently competitive; they need 3 things imo after watching these 2 games:
1) A real C who can rebound and keep other Cs in front of him. That way we can move Bargs to PF and be more effective. I understand y BC was looking at Dampier. To me Biedrins from GSW who is available would be a nice fit for this team.
2) Small but consistent contributions in scoring from Jack, Weems, DeRozan, Barbosa, Kleiza and anyone else who feels like having a good game. Need this nightly from different ppl.
3) Bargnani to average 18+ PPG while playing decent to good defence.
If they keep playing as aggressive defensively as they have so far all they’ve got to do is score more to stay in games and that’s where Bargs is so so so important. To me Bargs overall season can make or break this team.
As for the players so far: Anderson and Barbosa have been nice surprises. Klieza looks like he is going to be quite useful; Amir and DeRozan have shown no improvement in their game, Dorsey shows some promise but we have to see him in a meaningful game against starters before we really know, Jack is a keeper, Calderon is not himself and possibly isn’t as motivated to be here after the trade stuff, Reggie Evans looks in good shape and is playing better but he is not a starter and should come off the bench, Weems is gonna be fun to watch but he needs more experience before we can rely on him to be a 14+ppg guy which is what we need at SG.
dissapointed with derozan and bargs
by raptors_run_the_show on Oct 11, 2010 12:53 PM EDT reply actions
Preseason - WTH
.
Sometime after the Boston game was over, I started to wonder how the Blogs would play this one out. Part of me wanted to just "miss" the next day or so – as I find the incessant negativity can be a little too much for my liking. Despite how Doug Smith can be too Raptor (organization) orientated, he makes a good point about relaxing a bit. And I think cmrm123 said it right. This is preseason; it’s Boston; it was in Boston; and the players some call scrubs, are not what I’d call scrubs on other teams.
.
Never-the-less, I appreciate your perspective Franchise. Unlike a new Post at RR forums [Does Bargnani Deserve His Starting Position?], I find things here a lot less juvenile, and more tolerable – although I am a fan of Arsenalist.
.
Between bites of turkey, I got a chance to watch some of the game. The Raptor offense concerns me somewhat. The team seemed disjointed & not really organized. I know that AB has had poor pre-seasons before (his only better one, was his sophomore season – a season he’d like to forget), yet I’m a little worried. Is he out of shape? Why isn’t he taking more shots? Does he miss his gf? (Okay, that’s the juvenile in me coming out). Why is JT starting Reggie with Andrea?
.
Then there’s Amir – not many minutes coming his way. AJ is causing a little anxiety for me as well – however, I realize Boston has some big boys, and I would assume Jay will adjust when the games really mean something. I do understand that Reggie will NOT be starting games (God – I hope not). That Kleiza will probably be our starting SF. That guys like Barbosa, Weems, Jack (Caldy starting) will make our Secondary fairly decent.
When it comes to preseason, I’m always reminded of Blue Jay pitchers. During preseason, the veteran Pitchers try out new stuff, and don’t get worried if they get lit up – as long as it’s not too often. Whereas the new Pitchers are trying to show their stuff, and tend to stick to what got them there. Hopefully, that’s how things will go with this year’s Raps. Remember, we’re picked to be dead last.
Just as scorching Phoenix by 51 points doesn’t mean we’re a offensive juggernaut, losing to Boston by 4, does not make us defensive sieves.
As cmrm123 said: "I’ll take yesterday’s result as another sign we can at least compete."
.
If they view Johnson as a change of pace guy off the bench
Reggie starting makes sense as a placeholder until Davis is in game shape. Some of the early sentiment after the draft was that they’d do with Davis as they did with DeMar so the only way that happens is if he’s seeing a starting role, even in limited minutes. By starting Reggie, Davis’ return will only displace Reggie.
If they start Amir, it will be interesting to see how he performs and it will help clarify whether his so so pre-season is a result of not getting the starting spot he expected.
Question I need to ask about Bargnani is whether he works on his shot obsessively, like Dirk or Ray Allen, folks whose stroke is consistent. Is he taking a thousand shots an evening? His “rhythm” shouldn’t be an issue at this point in his career and this whole centre on defense, power forward on offense scheme looks like the team still pulling the player in too many directions instead of allowing him to settle into one role.
Happiness is that which gets lost in the details of its pursuit.
by HQ Interloper on Oct 11, 2010 2:06 PM EDT up reply actions
Concerning comments regarding Bargnani from Triano in this morning's Star article:
And then there was Andrea Bargnani, whose 1-for-8 shooting line looked better than his sluggish defensive work.
"(Bargnani) is not doing things as quickly, and with as much urgency as we’d like him to," the coach said. "Maybe he’s not in shape. . . . Maybe these practices are taking a toll."
Maybe they are, although Bargnani insisted he’s in fine shape and simply searching for what he termed his "rhythm."
Really!?!? After all that happened last year with Turk and an oportunity to come in to camp and take charge of this team with Bosh gone and the coach’s reaction to his play is “Maybe he’s not in shape”!?!?!? Thank god he’s signed up for another 5 seasons!
Maybe he's not in shape?
Didn’t he just spend the summer playing for the Italian team? Did he spend the few weeks in between the world championships and training camp eating pizza with Turkoglu? How does a professional athlete fall out of shape that fast?!
Man, the excuses this organization continues to make for Bargnani… just incredible…
by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Oct 11, 2010 1:39 PM EDT up reply actions
You know what, good on Triangelo for finally calling his ass out… For Triano to acatually call him out is a huge step in the right direction. Triangelo was silent for an entire season with Turkaglu, so for him to call out Bargnani at this early stage is something… Couple this with the reports out of camp that Triano is a lot more “no nonsense” this season is a step in the right direction… Maybe there’s hope for him yet!
Lets hope
There was definitely a lack of accountablility on this team last year. Here’s hoping Triano calling out Bargs is a sign of things to come. No more cradling the big man.
I don’t take that as triano defending bargs, he’s criticizing him…
by axl t on Oct 11, 2010 1:46 PM EDT via mobile up reply actions
Bargs vs Turk
.
Maybe I’m taking this the wrong way, but please … do not liken this year’s Andrea to a “Turk 2” version. Remember … Turkey sat out half of the Raptors preseason, and to infer that Andrea has the same demeanor as Mr. T, is complete BS. Especially when you draw that conclusion from 2 games – Preseason at that.
.
I’m concerned about AB’s game, and how he’ll handle double teams, and a more focused opposition. To me, that’s what I hope is Jay’s focus (beside Amir, Demar & a few others). That’s why he’s the Coach, and we’re not – thank God.
.
by RapthoseLeafs on Oct 11, 2010 1:49 PM EDT up reply actions
Yes exactly, he is the coach and HE is the one saying that Bargs is not doing things quickly, with urgency and that he may be out of shape. The correlation I was trying to draw with Turk is that despite how lazy Turk obviously was last year, not once was he directly called out by Triano (unitl it was too late). Two preseason games into this year and ALREADY Triano is calling out Bargs. I extrapolate from this that Bargs has been draging it in camp so far, so badly that the usually quite Triangelo is calling him out.
Well, Triano has reportedly been much more outgoing this year – see the Star’s ‘No more mister Nice Guy’ article. This probably has more to do with it than anything Bargs has done.
by dhackett1565 on Oct 12, 2010 11:12 AM EDT up reply actions
Bargs Playing Time
Whether we like it or not that dog don`t bark (nor does it rebound), so let`s get serious. Only a massive shot of testosterone will get him to play anywhere near his potential, and I`m guessing that`s illegal. Unfortunately, the organization has a huge investment in him, and they can`t very well sit him for five years, nor can they trade him given his lengthy contract. Best case for all concerned would be to bring in someone (like Dampier) who is at least a passable imitation of an NBA center. Bargs then moves to the 4 where he splits time with Johnson while Kleiza plays the three along with Weems. Once Davis comes back, Johnson and Bargs can watch, I heard those courtside seats are awesome.





























