The Scoop on Belinelli
For those of you who have read the HQ since the days of wordpress you know my favorite team before the Raps was the Golden State Warriors. Since the J-Rich deal I have followed them less and less so when the Belinelli deal went down I had to go to the source to get the real scoop...the Golden State of Mind and its readers.
The Warriors HQ and their readers respond.
There seems to be so much debate around what sort of player he is and whether he can actually come to Toronto and contribute. With that in mind I needed to find out more....
We urge you to head over to GSoM to see how the Warriors responded to the following four questions.
Asking #1: There has been a lot of discussion about what sort of player Belinelli is now and what he could be. Your recent poll is suggesting he is fools gold but there are also a lot of Raps fans who recall his performance against the team when he went 5/8FG3, 6/6FT, 6AST, 23PTS, in a 117 point GSW win. Was this a complete anomoly, much like his summer league performance a few years back? Has any other player built a reputation based on one summer league game like Belinelli appears to have done?
Asking #2: Raptors fan are generally pretty excited about the trade. George was not going to contribute a great deal and Belinelli seems to be falling into a best case scenario given the United Nations feel with the Raps and the possibility of more PT. What went wrong in Golden State? Is it simply a numbers game and that Belinelli is less talented than the rest of the current players at his position? Or, is it the circus of a front office (and the politics that came with that)?
Asking #3: The feeling at the HQ is that even if Belinelli doesn't work out the team didn't have to give up much to get someone with upside and who could become a rotation player. It's not like Colangelo gave up a first round pick for Marcus Williams....(ouch!). There seems to be some sentiment that if Belinelli doesn't get minutes however, he could cause a disturbance in the locker room. Is there anything to support this?
Asking #4: One player readers keep comparing him to is former Raptor Jason Kapono. Although Kapono could shoot he was an atrocious defender. Is Belinelli really that bad a defender? Is there another NBA player who might be a better comparison (please say yes!)?
You may or may not like what the answers are, but you'll be more educated about Belinelli by the time you're done reading.
I know I am.
0 recs |
25 comments
Comments
Not really sure what to make of the Q&A. The person answering the questions seems to think Belinelli is a weak player but a lot of the other fans seem to like him. Personally, I think the Raptors are hoping that having fellow Italians around will help him develop his game. Worse case scenario, they opt out of his contract next summer.
by McGateway on Aug 1, 2009 9:57 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Belinelli
I think Belinelli is a fine acquisition. We gave up little, he has a chance to do some damage, he must compete to get in the games yet the Raptors don’t have quite the logjam that GSW has at his natural position … it’s an awesome deal! If we don’t get Carlos we don’t get Carlos. I like the guy but maybe it’s time to move on. Sign Pops and get him on the floor running around like a madman chasing SFs. It’ll be good for him.
by N C on Aug 1, 2009 10:21 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Sometimes I think you guys WANT to focus on the bad.... but I still love ya!
Seriously, you guys are so hellbent on finding the flaws in a player like Belinelli that you’re willing to reach out to a GSW dude who sounds like he never liked Belinelli either (maybe he’s a big Nellie supporter). If you read the posts for some perspective you really get a greater sense that these fans really wish they had been given a chance to see more of Marco and are going to miss him after having had to watch him be traded away for a bag of balls.
WHEN GIVEN THE OPPORTUNITY Marco showed signs of life and performed (check his stats from last season when he got the starting nod). He was a decent PG/SG playing on a team LOADED with guys at that position and from the sounds of it run by a coach that didn’t like him (one of the posters mentioned Nellie’s penchance for shutting a player down if he decides he doesn’t like him).
So Raptors HQ guys, look deep down inside for that wonderlust from your childhood you’ve misplaced sometime after realizing you had to work for a living and try to see the positives in this. He IS an improvement from what was on our bench last year…….you absolutely CANT deny that. And he’s walking into the absolutely perfect scenario for him. A great city that loves it’s international flavour and a team that already has a familiar face on it.
And to top it off, we got him for basically nothing.
Speaking of getting something for nothing, when are we gonna see some Raptors HQ shirt give aways??
Keep up the good work guys, love everything you guys do, even if you need to be hit with the Happy Stick every now and then! lol.
Never underestimate the power of denial
by vulcanoboy on Aug 1, 2009 10:50 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Optimism
Vulcanoboy -
Although the GSoM blogger isn’t a big fan of Belinelli it was more the comments we are interested in. There appears to be no consensus on Marco as a player and we wanted to get the Warriors fans take. This wasn’t to promote negativity but to get the views of those who watch the most Warriors basketball. I definitely like the move, was just trying to get a better sense of him as a player.
As I mentioned I loved the Warriors but now staying up until 1 am to see their games conclude just isn’t an option. Wanted more info, not to bash the guy.
Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com
by RaptorsHQ - Howland on Aug 1, 2009 11:03 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
"Not a big fan of Belinelli"
That has to win the prize for the understatement of the year!!!
by Johnn19 on Aug 1, 2009 2:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The point of us reaching out to GSoM was to get a different perspective, which I don’t think some of us share, but is an alternate none the less. I know we don’t necessarily have the same style of thinking or writing, but you can see at least from some of the longer posts in the comments how some of the fans are able to expand on their opinions, which is always a good thing. That’s one thing we love about our readership is just how long and expansive their comments have become over the years and to be honest, I haven’t really heard or seen a real serious breakdown on Belinelli’s skills. Oh, and we’re fostering a sense of community between our fellow blogs here at SB Nation. ;)
lol. And I’m plenty happy :p Just those two grouches over there… points at Franchise and Howland Are missing their GI Joe Marathon to look at this stuff up. :p
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on Aug 1, 2009 11:45 AM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Fair enough.
….still no mention of Raptors HQ t-shirt giveaway though…. hmmmmmm
;)
Never underestimate the power of denial
by vulcanoboy on Aug 1, 2009 1:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
Belissimo
I’m still trying to get my head around on this trade.
GSW gave us Belissimo …….. for what again?
Oh yeah – 1.6 million bucks (or thereabouts).
Way I see it, if we look at George for what he was going to be, we basically bought out his contract. And going with that line of thinking, we picked up Belissimo for nothing. And forget the value of an expiring contract (George’s) for a future trade — we made them already. At least the important ones.
The first upside is, we had no minutes for George. Now we don’t have to worry about that issue – we have that with Banks right now, although he’s made it easier to just disregard him (Summer league no show that he was).
The second upside is — it’s only one year (at this time). And should we decide to move Mr. B before the trading deadline, I’m sure we can get MORE FOR HIM, then what GSW sold him for.
The third upside, is a potentially positive side for Andrea. Besides having a fellow Bocce player, and Italian swearing partner (on the court), AB gets a chance to boost his own confidence to a greater level. Being a 3rd year Raptor, Bargnani could be that mentor who brings Belissimo’s ability out, and in turn make Andrea feel important to the Raptors cause – as mentoring tends to do.
But no matter how this all turns out, I’m still sitting here wondering … GSW traded Belissimo because …………………..
by RapthoseLeafs on Aug 1, 2009 1:27 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Updated piece for you all
I should also be clear on the Raps angle since we have a lot of Raptors fans reading. First of all, welcome T-Town. As my esteemed colleague JAE and I have written at length this trade is meaningless for the Warriors. In the long run it’s also pretty meaningless for the Raptors. But if you want to assign a grade for the Raptors front office for this move, it’s undoubtedly an A. It’s a low risk, potentially high reward move. They traded nothing for the possibility of something. Can’t fault that one bit from the Raps angle- unlike that silly and unnecessary extension for quite possibly the worst rebounding big man in the league, but that’s another story for another time…
Golden State of Mind :: Always keeping it... "Unstoppable Baby!"
by Atma Brother ONE on Aug 1, 2009 1:30 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Silly and Unnecessary Extension
Gotta say …. your last line in that update “Silly and Unnecessary ….” …… I completely disagree on that.
Personally … and I’ve watched all but 2 or 3 games last year (and sometimes twice – it’s the PVR thing) .. but I’m getting sick and tired of this ABSOLUTE focus on AB’s rebounding. Yeah, Bargnani’s numbers could be better. But if you watch some games, and take away those uncontested rebounds (when the opposition heads back to set up their defense), I’d think his percentage of total team rebounds would be higher then it is now.
I remember on MANY occasions, when Moon would come flying over top 2 or 3 Raptors (with no opposition in site), in order to grab a rebound. Hell, in Miami they thought they were getting Marion lite. Then the Mavs sign him to 3 million per, for 2 years. wtf.
But enough of the Moon rant.
I know rebounding was one of Andrea’s problems, but for me, the bigger issue about last year was …….. we PLAYED 5 on 3 for most games. Our production out of the 2 and 3 (pre Marion) was horrible — I kept hearing how these positions are occupied by some of the best NBA players, while we were the opposite. And when Jose went down, that just made things worse.
I may be delusional about AB, but I still think he still has a lot more upside to him. And for a Centre (yeah .. not his real position blah blah blah), I see a healthy individual (knock on wood). Look around and see the issues with the Big guys. Somehow I feel confident that the Andrea extension is not so foolhardy.
by RapthoseLeafs on Aug 1, 2009 1:59 PM EDT reply actions 1 recs
Cavs signed him, but exactly. lol.
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on Aug 1, 2009 3:26 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
From A Warrior Fan
Most of the Warriors Fans you are reading about Belinelli from on Golden state of Mind are throwing Belinelli under the bus now that he has been traded. Everybody is jumping on the Anthony Morrow Bandwagon, But if it were not for Belinelli getting injured late last season Morrow would have never found his way back into the rotation. Yes, Morrow is a more consistent shooter than Belinelli but that is mainly cause most of his shots he takes are catch and shoot wide open shots. Belinelli can create his own shot and has the ability to make fading shots that are difficult which of course your not going to shoot as high as percentage at.
I think if he gets 20-25 min a game he could average about 13ppg, 5 assists
by Belinelli's the savior on Aug 1, 2009 2:29 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Anthony Morrow is a legit NBAer if his 3P% can stay anywhere near what it was last year. 47% from deep is ridiculous. What we expected out of Kapono if he would ever shoot a 3.
Belinelli is no slouch either with a (52.4 eFG), Morrow (55.8) was almost to Ray Allen territory (57.5). The only Raptors who played consistently with an eFG over 50.0 are Bargnani (51.2), Kapono (51.3) and Calderon (56.1).
I would consider it a good year for Belinelli to average 10 points, 2.5 reb, 2.5 ast in 20 minutes with good shooting percentages.
by bigweeze on Aug 1, 2009 4:06 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
I think some perspective is needed here
The bottom line is that this was a great trade. The ‘something for nothing’ line sums it up perfectly. It’s the equivalent of the Hoffa for Hump trade. We traded a guy who wasn’t going to contribute at all, for a young guy who has some potential. Belinelli will likely fall into to the Hump role of rotation guy, who’ll occasionally have some very solid performances. You don’t trade Devean George and a bag of bean and get Kobe Bryant back in return, but if Belinelli can contribute, which he will because the Raptors don’t exactly have world beaters that the wing position, the trade was a smart one.
by CalexanderJ on Aug 1, 2009 2:38 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
what up with golden state of mind
too much negativety. so let me continue…
first with the “craptors get out of their way” and their bargs bashing. (for 50 mil for 5 years… that reminds me of maggettes deal, haha. i guess they know more about the consequences of giving 10 mil/yr than we do). oh and lastly about belinelli being worst than 95% of the other guards in the nba. well i believe the warriors are 95% worst than the other teams in the nba
by tea time on Aug 1, 2009 2:42 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Further
Wanted to mention, that I think the site is great.
Love the EASY connection to other NBA blogs – great way to get a perspective on players (like Mr. B) who make their way to the Raptors.
One small complaint though — the red is overwhelming at times. A little more subdued (or some different shading) would make things easier on the eyes.
All in all though …. Great views, and perspectives.
RapthoseLeafs
by RapthoseLeafs on Aug 1, 2009 3:40 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
What can we lose
George wasn’t gonna give us anything – it seems like If Belinelli can give us anything we are ahead. Giving up on a 23 year old Eoropean seems premature. I hope he gets the hance to compete.
Amazing how the depth issue has swung. All of a sudden, we are among the deepest in the East. All of a sudden no-one is all that concerned about Bosh resigning or being traded(was a big fan of it). BC has now put us in a position where we can comfortably start the season with the players we now have and see how things play out. Preseason is about two anda half months away!
To put things in proper perspective, at this time last year I was cheering the signing of JO, singing the praises of Coach Sam and calling for home court in the playoffs….. but…..
it all comes down to what Triano and Iavaroni can do with this group that Colangelo has assembled, The talent is there, arguably two deep at each position, to compete for 48 minutes. with any team. The NBA is one league where a coaching strategy can make a difference. If Triano can press the right buttons, if Iavoroni can help our defence we can make some noise.
I ‘ll give Triano credit for Bargnani’s offensive turnaround last season, a continuation of that is important to our success this season. To the critics of his rebounding and defence – take a pill. Bargnani’s rebounding and defensive game will continue to improve(no-one hardly mentions that it did noticably improve last season). I really think he will grow into a strong defensive presence. I am not of the group that says we lack defense, we need Bosh and Barg’s to step up to their fullest.
Bosh, no longer being the offensive focal point can put more of his time towards rebounding. Evans will add some boards, Turkoglu, Rasho, Jack and DeRozan – I just don’t see our rebounding worst than last season. Mark my words.
by Tinmann on Aug 1, 2009 6:37 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
I’d say that this is the team and coaching that Colangelo wants and with that unified vision, we’re going to see Colangelo’s brand of basketball, pure and simple. It makes it really interesting in my opinion.
I think all of us who follow Bargnani daily know just how much and drastic his improvements are… Which is why I’m trying very hard not to blow my top over at GSoM right now. lol
Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com
by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on Aug 1, 2009 7:48 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs
The New Season
Despite some great moves, there’s one issue that concerns me with the upcoming season. Men and minutes.
But before I get to that, I wanted to say this has been a fun ride that BC has taken us on. I do worry the next few months will be painfully slow. A lingering torture of nothing — not quite unlike what one would find at Denny Crane’s "Guantanamo by the Bay" …. " I like all kind of resorts …. ".
If I was to choose a TSN turning point for the past while (and No – not the TSN2 version), I’d have to say it was the moment that light bulb came on in Fruitman’s mind.
Steve Fruitman came up with the idea – and by the way, he’s a Chartered accountant – eventually leading the Raptors to all that has transpired. If this was an episode of Sliders, the Alternate fate for the upcoming season might’ve been hard on the loyalists. And then there’d be the following year – sans Bosh. But as much as I believe that Fruitman is the type of guy an organization needs, it will always be BC who deserves a good chunk of the credit. Fruitman gave him the chance, and BC took it from there.
I remember reading, during the He-do-He-dont signing, Doug Smith saying no way in hell Orlando does a sign & trade with the Raptors. Part of that thinking was because we had nothing to really offer, that Orlando might need or want – short of Bosh I guess. I do like reading DS, even though I find him a bit condescending at times. I just didn’t agree with him on the No way No hell option – and I felt this was a classic example of belittling those who wondered.
Being in the business world for a number of years, my first reaction to Dougy’s "lack of consideration" was …. EVERYONE HAS A PRICE. Orlando has one. We just needed to discover it ………… cue Stevie.
All that being said, I’m concerned about minutes. And the morale that goes with minutes. I remember when we were loaded with some decent talent, but too few minutes. I believe our talent is better this time around, even if the minutes aren’t. Marco coming here, best illustrates how that can affect a player, and the team. Hopefully Jay can make it all work. I’d rather injuries not be the solution.
by RapthoseLeafs on Aug 1, 2009 7:57 PM EDT reply actions 0 recs
rare win-win trade & warriors fan perspective
Belinelli wasn’ t going to get minutes, too deep on the depthchart, would have happened on last years injury plagued team. Golden State’s need is frontcourt beef. While D. George is a pretty generic NBA player, the W’s don’t have many players like him. I expect D. George to play more minutes for the Ws than Belinelli would have. And the primary motive for GSW appears to be expiring contract & cash.
Belinelli does have an upside, the vision of a high-scoring slasher, shooter, ballhandler and showed this on enough occasions to have a fan base. He wasnt consistent enough but rarely truly horrible. My take on him is hes a bit of a tweener, not strong enough for the frontcourt, not quick enough to defend NBA caliber guards, but he might be a good role player. Obviously yet one more Euro for Team Europe and the ladies are likely to like him, as well at least a handful of other NBA teams. I suspect at the very least Toronto could trade him for someone more useful to them than D. George.
by Chris4 on Aug 2, 2009 2:08 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
B & B
I haven’t posted in a while, but have been reading your posts as often as I can. An infant, a wild three year old and a long European vacation will do that to anyone. I thought that you guys would enjoy this. It is just one game, but it shows his potential. His game certainly does have Manu qualities. And again, we picked him up for nothing. GS fans don’t realize that MLSE is a very wealthy company that can afford to throw 1.6 million dollars out the window. That doesn’t concern us fans. We simply want ownership to build us a team that can compete and entertain!
Re: Bargnani’s rebounding numbers. Someone should post on their site (too lazy to create an account) that Bargs rebounding numbers are lower than other C’s in the league because he doesn’t play under the basket. What makes him special is the fact that he forces his defender out to the perimeter. In addish, he bats quite a few balls each game back to one of the guards who then get credited for the board. This is what happens when you don’t watch any Raptor games!
by Assistant GM on Aug 2, 2009 8:31 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Congrats!!!
By the way, the new site is awesome and I think it’s far more user friendly! You guys keep doing an incredible job keeping us up-to-date and informed regarding our Raps. Keep up the great work…RaptorsHQ rules!!!
by Assistant GM on Aug 2, 2009 8:34 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Just read your post Chris4. I like your perspective! No one really loses out on this deal, unless Belinelli lights it up for us. The reality is, as your post suggests, he can probably be a good role player (if not more – or less) for us Raps! If not, we cut him loose…
by Assistant GM on Aug 2, 2009 8:39 AM EDT reply actions 0 recs
Thanks, and more on Belinelli
from a kind of interesting and exhaustive analysis of the theory that GSW’s Don Nelson doesn’t play rookies. I’ll spare you the methodology but will add the link and the author of this has some interesting projections for current and recently current (byebyeBelli) players. To the point:
“While Belinelli is no longer on the team, I’d like to go over his numbers since he was recently traded and due to his summer league performances and Nelson’s comments, he gave some Warrior fans misguided hope of greater things to come. Marco had a dramatic improvement in minutes jumping into orange tier and like Bukie and Watson before him Marco looks to be a solid NBA rotation player but he’s a long shot to be an All*Star given the lack of starts in his second year. Marco will likely be a rotation player, but he has upside to be an S-Jax like starter. As you can see the Warriors have enough “starters/NBA rotation players” at the wing spots so trading the one you would use the least for a practice body and cash is not a big deal especially considering the potential distractions a la Pietrus in 07-08. Nelson gave Marco a look and saw he didn’t have “it.”
http://www.goldenstateofmind.com/2009/8/3/976474/an-in-depth-study-don-nelson
by Chris4 on Aug 4, 2009 9:33 PM EDT up reply actions 0 recs

by 













