Navigation: Jump to content areas:


Pro Quality. Fan Perspective.
Login-facebook
Around SBN: Super Bowl Recipes: A Guide To The Perfect Game Day Menu

The Importance of DeMar DeRozan

On a day away from previews and recaps, Franchise looks at the impact of DeMar DeRozan to date and discusses how integral he is to the success of the Toronto Raptors this season...

Star-divide

Around noon today the Toronto Raptors will be unveiling their newest jerseys, retro "Huskies" uniforms meant to comemorate the 1946-47 Toronto Huskies basketball club.

These jerseys will be worn during six home games this season as part of the NBA's Hardwood Classic Nights and of course, as part of the Raptors' ongoing 15 year celebration.

Participating in the jersey unveiling, which we'll be attending, will be two current Dinos; Hedo Turkoglu, and the focus of this morning's post, DeMar DeRozan.

As most readers know, DeRozan wasn't my top choice for the Raptors this past off-season in regards to the draft.  He did hover in our top prospect rankings most of the season, but there were other players, most notably Gerald Henderson and Terence Williams, who I would have preferred the Raps took a shot at with the ninth overall pick.  I just wasn't convinced that DeRozan, apart from being an excellent athlete, had enough dominant basketball skills to be an impact player at the next level.  Sure he was good in a number of areas and as mentioned, quite athletic, but the NBA draft is littered with countless "athletes" who never could put it together once they reached the big show. 

(Cough...Rodney Carney...cough cough, Joey Graham.)

And up until last week, it was hard to argue that DeRozan wasn't falling into this same realm.

Yes, he was starting for the Raps, but the team was hardly looking like a playoff contender and DeRozan was averaging only 6.6 points and 2.6 rebounds while shooting a slightly clunky 44 per cent from the field.  His PER was an underwhelming 12.69 (the league average is 15), and for someone with his athleticism and "hops," his rebounding and defensive metrics were quite poor.

Prior to the start of the season I had identified two players as being the biggest X factors this season for Toronto; Andrea Bargnani and Mr. DeRozan.  I felt that solid and consistent contributions from these two could really elevate the club's playoff potential simply because both added very unique elements to the team, ones that were essential for on-court success in this league.

In DeRozan's case, it was his ability to get to the rim and create off the bounce.  At USC, DeRozan was a handful for opposing guards in this capacity and as the season wore on, he became more and more aggressive in terms of attacking the basket.  It was this attribute, in particular from the wing position, that I was extremely interested in this season.  Since Vince Carter's departure, the Raps have lacked a player who could do these sort of things and in today's NBA, I thought it critical to have this element in the starting line-up.

Put it this way; of the recent NBA champions, have there been any without an athletic 2 who could create his own shot with the clock winding down?

Maybe Detroit; but they seem to be the caveat to every question like this regarding past champs.

For Toronto to not only return to the playoffs, but to push past the Vegas-set 42 win plateau, I felt it essential to get this sort of offensive attack from DeMar.

Unfortunately as mentioned, DeMar's production was hardly anything to write home about early in the season, to the point that it seemed inevitable that with the Raptors' struggles, he'd be one of the first to be replaced in the starting line-up.

But then a funny thing happened.

Despite being blown out in Atlanta, DeMar had one of his best offensive performances of the season, scoring 21 points.  In that game, he got to the free-throw line 12 times, and even when the game was well out of reach for the Dinos, he continued to be aggressive in going to the basket.

This carried over to the next two games as well, both wins, where DeRozan put up 16 and 11 points respectively, and in both matches, helped set the tone early by attacking the hoop and throwing down some vicious dunks. 

There's no clear win correlation yet, (the Raptors are 3 and 5 when DeMar averages 10 or more points), but I feel that as the season goes on, one thing will become obvious; when DeRozan is scoring off the bounce and attacking the basket, this Raptors team takes a giant step forward in terms of potential.

Suddenly, with DeRozan drawing defenders into the paint, the Raptors' plethora of outside bombers are free for open looks off of kickouts, and instead of being the primary offensive focus, Chris Bosh is free to use his new low-post mojo to finish any of DeRozan's misses. 

Derozanvegas09_medium
(DeRozan takes a break during Summer-League action.)

 

As well, in a league where many of the top offensive threats reside at the 2, suddenly Toronto is able to ensure that these shooting guards aren't conserving themselves at the defensive end, something which has been the case in the past.

And that's not even getting into DeRozan's ability to ignite the crowd or his team with a highlight-reel flush, something that can't exactly be quantified with any sort of metric.

Am I expecting DeRozan to play like gangbusters each and every night now from here on out?

Hardly.

The Vince Carter comparisons were over-blown as in many ways they are very different players, and I expect like the majority of rookies, his first season will be a series of highs and lows.

There's already some solid talent on this Raptor team so they don't need a VC type rookie performance to carry the club.  If the Raptors can simply get a sustained and aggressive offensive attack from the rookie, this will be a huge boost for Toronto.

Already this month, DeRozan has gotten to the free throw line 22 times compared to 32 for all of November so indeed it looks like he's heading in the right direction.  If he continues this level of aggression at both ends of the court, and shies away from the forced jumpers, that's really all TO can ask for this season.

After all, perhaps it can be argued that the Raps don't need another VC at the moment, but they certainly don't need another Chris Jeffries...

Comment 35 comments  |  0 recs  | 

Do you like this story?

Comments

Display:

Busting out the Chris Jeffries reference — nice!

I expected single-digit scoring out of DeRozan with flases of what’s to come. I haven’t been disappointed by anything, other than the organization’s insistence on force-feeding him minutes and a starting spot… Oddly enough, when DeRozan has had it going, Jay Triano has kept him nailed to the bench in crunch time. Oh well.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 7, 2009 9:55 AM EST reply actions  

Where value hits the hardwood

DeRozan has been a pleasant surprise. Props to him for realizing the jump shot should be his last option on offense. What I would like to see more of is offensive rebounding…stick around the rim a bit longer since Bargs and Turk have no affinity for getting the garbage rebounds.

by Oldskewl on Dec 7, 2009 10:53 AM EST reply actions  

He’s one of the top SGs in the league in offensive rebounding percentage.

by dhackett1565 on Dec 7, 2009 9:15 PM EST up reply actions  

I am puzzled by people making statements like “do not shoot, drive” or the opposite, like it is actually possible to be consistently good at one without the other….

by renato on Dec 7, 2009 10:57 AM EST reply actions  

Great point

DeRozan has to develop the jump shot in order to take the next step in his development. Otherwise, defenders will sag off him and limit his opportunities to drive. The two go hand-in-hand.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 7, 2009 11:17 AM EST up reply actions  

I think that will come with time – his shooting form isn’t too wonky so hopefully lots of Hopla time helps out.

by Adam Francis on Dec 7, 2009 11:38 AM EST up reply actions  

I wake up today wonderin what Portland would be like if they had drafted Durant instead? Even a Horford.

by Ustation on Dec 7, 2009 11:01 AM EST reply actions  

Portland made the right decision. Greg Oden is the more talented player:

This year, though, Oden was turning into the player teams were willing to lose games to acquire in 2007. After 21 games his WP48 was 0.322.

To put this mark in perspective, let’s consider the 188 players who played more than 1,500 minutes last season. Of these players, the following six were the only players to post a WP48 mark beyond the 0.322 we saw from Oden this season.

Chris Paul: 0.451 WP48
LeBron James: 0.436 WP48
Dwight Howard: 0.378 WP48
Troy Murphy: 0.369 WP48
Dwyane Wade: 0.350 WP48
Jason Kidd: 0.329 WP48

Oden’s mark of 0.322 surpasses everyone else who played 1,500 minutes last season. And that means Oden – on a per-minute basis – was more productive than Kevin Garnett, Tim Duncan, and Kobe Bryant last season. Yes, Oden was very good before he broke his kneecap

http://www.huffingtonpost.com/david-berri/a-convenient-excuse-for-t_b_382046.html

In order to select Kevin Durant, you would’ve been gambling on the injuries unfolding as they have (it’s pretty much been worst-case scenario for Oden to date). But this is the same logic that causes guys like Danny Granger and DeJuan Blair to slip in drafts, and we’ve seen how that worked out.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 7, 2009 11:15 AM EST up reply actions  

you are still getting wet for a guy who has more fouls than rebound…..

by renato on Dec 7, 2009 12:35 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s slightly inaccurate. I mean, the guy does rack up the fouls — but he contributes a helluva lot when he’s on the floor.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 7, 2009 3:09 PM EST up reply actions  

Maybe I have been unlucky

I must admit I follow the blazers sporadically so my sample is small but… the guy does not score much he is, at the moment a slightly better rebounded than let’s say Andrea and his defense is worse (because he cannot move without committing a foul)

by renato on Dec 7, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

I think you also have to take into account the teams they’ve played this season and what division they’re in. His numbers would be significantly better in the East.

by Ustation on Dec 7, 2009 3:47 PM EST up reply actions  

Look at rebounding per 40 minutes

Oden is top 5 in the league (slightly ahead of Bosh) while Bargnani is 79th. Even per game averages — with Bargnani averaging 33 minutes to Oden’s 24 minutes — has Oden outrebounding him by two per game.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 7, 2009 4:04 PM EST up reply actions  

The argument if flawed

as you are assuming he COULD stain ont the court for that time, and he is not

by renato on Dec 8, 2009 6:17 AM EST up reply actions  

Hindsight aside, I think GO was the right choice that year. Though KD had really climbed up that chart considering GO was the next Lebron.

by Ustation on Dec 7, 2009 2:47 PM EST up reply actions  

But this is the same logic that causes guys like Danny Granger and DeJuan Blair to slip in drafts, and we’ve seen how that worked out.

How so? Who’s to say Blair doesn’t have a career ending injury tomorrow?

How have we seen that ‘work out?’ Granger I’ll give you, but if you can only give one example of this…

Oh, and worst case scenario, his career would be over already. Like, two years ago. He has a chance yet.

by dhackett1565 on Dec 7, 2009 9:18 PM EST up reply actions  

Gerald Henderson was actually my second choice, behind DeRozan. When drafting lottery picks, the safe pick isn’t always the best one. The guys I’m glad the Raptors didn’t pick were James Johnson, Earl Clark and Jrue Holiday. Those names scared me.

by Tim W. on Dec 7, 2009 11:24 AM EST reply actions  

Still like Clark a lot, and Holiday could still be a solid player as well. However I didn’t prefer either to DeRozan.

One guy I did prefer?

DeJuan Blair…

by Adam Francis on Dec 7, 2009 11:36 AM EST up reply actions  

I think Blairs injury concerns did warrant him dropping out of the top 10 as you cannot expect a team who sucked enough to get a lottery pick in the top 10 to take a flyer on a guy with an injury history. However, I was surprised that he dropped into the 2nd round.
Portland made the same mistake that almost every team makes every year though. They drafted size over potential stud guard. It is why everyone passed on Wade, Chris Paul, Paul Pierce/VC, Brandon Roy etc. Year after year teams draft a big player like Oden (or Bargnani even) over the smaller finesse players. Even Michael Jordan got passed over for Sam Bowie. Do you think Portland would do that again irregardless of what numbers Bowie put up in WP?

by McGateway on Dec 7, 2009 11:43 AM EST up reply actions  

The problem is that historically, outside of Jordan’s Bulls and that fluke Pistons title, elite big men win championships. There’s a reason why Shaq and Duncan have had their hands on almost every championship trophy in recent memory.

And before someone invokes the name Kobe Bryant winning last year, remember he had a bit of help from a very elite big in Gasol.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 7, 2009 11:56 AM EST up reply actions  

Ya, I thought Blair would have been a good pick, but not at 9 with his knees. I have no problem with teams not drafting him in the top 15, but to have him drop to where he did was a little ridiculous. I mean, would you rather have a few years of DuJuan Blair or 5 seasons of BJ Mullens?

And it’s true about teams needing elite big men to win. Portland looks like it may have lost on the gamble, but it was a good gamble to take.

And Chris Paul didn’t drop because a team took a big man ahead of him (Marvin Williams isn’t a big man). He dropped because Atlanta was stupid. Wade didn’t drop. He just ended up being better than expected. Same with Roy. You’re looking at these drafts in hindsight, and making assumptions. Big men have also gone later than they should have. Joakim Noah and Brook Lopez should have gone much higher (probably top 3), but, again, most didn’t think they would be as good as they have become.

by Tim W. on Dec 7, 2009 12:43 PM EST up reply actions  

Earl Clark

Don’t write this kid off yet. He is going to be a very good player.

There are very few kids I feel worse for than Oden. He was playing quite well before this injury. He’s humble, works heard and doesn’t deserve this bad luck. I hope he rebounds nicely.

Dave "Howland" Randell
Co-Creator of RaptorsHQ.com

by RaptorsHQ - Howland on Dec 7, 2009 12:50 PM EST up reply actions  

I wrote TIm Thomas, er, Earl Clark off before the draft. Talented but lazy guys scare the crap out of me (in the draft).

by Tim W. on Dec 7, 2009 1:04 PM EST up reply actions  

Actually, I think you are missing the point. Bigs need help to win championships as Shaq has yet to win one without an elite guard playing beside him where Jordan did it with another wing. In other words, Elite bigs cannot win championships on their own (at least not anymore) while an elite guard can (Don’t Forget that Lebron dragged his team to the championship with absolutely no one else on his team). People draft Bigs first because of the old basketball adage “You can’t teach size” but I would still rather have 2 elite swings on my team over just Shaq.

by McGateway on Dec 7, 2009 1:19 PM EST up reply actions  

Impressed

Just last week I wrote on one of these posts that if I was coach I would take Derozan out of the starting 5 and put Belli in. That is way Jay T is the coach and I am not. Over the last three games I have been very impressed with Derozan. I do think he has earned more minutes. Right now he plays about the first 8-9 minutes of the first and comes back with one or two mins in the second. I think he has EARNED more minutes with his D. I’d start bringing him back at the 7 or 8 minute mark of the second and let him play 10-12 minutes of the third.

Franchise…Blair. Oh man as Blair slipped I was screaming at the computer for BC to do something for a second round pick. I was thinking Roko and Cash for a pick. Even paying 3mil. How good would Blair look on this team… Blair being tutored by Reggie Evans!

by WinnipegRaptorFan on Dec 7, 2009 1:24 PM EST reply actions  

Great Article

That’s all I’ve got to say really, I think you hit the nail on the head with this one.

DD wasn’t my first choice either (preferred Henderson), but he has shown lately that he wasn’t a bad pick by any means. Hope he continues to attack the rim instead of taking jump shots. The Raps desperately need an above average player at SG bec it changes the dynamics of the game when the other team has to guard the perimeter.

by Member29 on Dec 7, 2009 2:01 PM EST reply actions  

and

Big Up to the coaching staff, they’ve done an excellent job the last two games.

by Member29 on Dec 7, 2009 2:02 PM EST reply actions  

Some things to remember re DeRozan

DeMar is only 20 Aug 7/09 with 35 games in the NCA at USC and 22 in the NBA. Very, very talented, and very, very raw/inexperiencd, playing with the top 4 scorers on the Rap’s.

What we are seeing are small glimpses, (at 7.7 ppg) of the outstanding potential, that caused JT and BC to select him at #9 in the draft. His potential to excel as a starting 2/3 is off the charts, and in the coming months and years we will see an outstanding starting 5 for the Raptors.

As an added note of reference, last year Kapono contributed 8.2ppg and Graham 7.7ppg, both after years of NBA experience.

by Johnn19 on Dec 7, 2009 2:49 PM EST reply actions  

Decided to really analyze how the Raps have really done in their first 15 years vs modern era expansion teams:

by Ustation on Dec 7, 2009 2:50 PM EST reply actions  

Better link: http://i50.tinypic.com/b3n87s.jpg

by Ustation on Dec 7, 2009 2:51 PM EST up reply actions  

That’s really interesting to look at. I mean, there’s so many observations that you could pull from that.

by RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance on Dec 7, 2009 3:07 PM EST up reply actions  

What I see is that an expansion team will suck until at least year 4 and that there seems to a common dip at year 8 (though for the Heat, they did that in year 7).

by siggian on Dec 7, 2009 3:10 PM EST up reply actions  

but also look at year 15.. look what happened to the Magic and heat. Even the Hornets weren’t much of a team either.

by Ustation on Dec 7, 2009 3:45 PM EST up reply actions  

Magic have Dwight now, but Shaq and Penny before. Heat had Mourning and Hardaway. I think it really emphasizes the draft and how having a good draft in the right year will change your team’s fortunes for a long time. Other than giving you good times when they’re with your team, when you trade them, they usually return fair value.

Of course, VC and Tmac not included.

Kinnon "Vicious D" Yee
Author - RaptorsHQ.com Twitter @RapHQVicious

by Raptors HQ - Vicious D on Dec 7, 2009 5:15 PM EST up reply actions  

Comments For This Post Are Closed


User Tools

RaptorsHQ is a growing, interactive community committed to providing the best Raptors and Canadian basketball content on the web.

FanPosts

Community blog posts and discussion.

Recent FanPosts

Small
outside the top 5
Small
Andrea 2.0 Article
Small
"Go Raps Go" - "um, Daddy; what's a Rap?"
Jordan-sky-high---men_s-eastbay-wp-1152x864_small
Bryan Colangelo: Pay Attention. Here We Go!
Small
Jonas Talks About How His Coach Emphasizes Defense
Small
TORONTO and NEW YORK as trading partners.
Small
Loss of Andrea Bargnani a big blow for Raptors
Jumpman_logo_small
My Raptors Rebuild
Small
lost against Blazers
Small
Time for a facelift?

+ New FanPost All FanPosts >


Managers

2009_0503draft09-20006_-_williams_solo_small Adam Francis

Basketball_20gym_20in_20sun2009-01-27-1233091216_small RaptorsHQ - Howland

Editors

Viciousd_2005-01-20_small Raptors HQ - Vicious D

Authors

Burgundy_small RaptorsHQ - Defensive Stance

Img_0813_small rbala