Tip-In: Best Actors in a Supporting Role
In what was a foul-filled and extremely choppy game, it was the Raptors supporting cast who brought home the award for their 31st win in a 93-76 victory over the Bobcats.
Chris Bosh, Jorge Garbajosa, and even Kris Humphries got into early foul trouble forcing Sam Mitchell to play small ball for most of the second quarter. However the lineup of Mo Pete, Jose Calderon, Joey Graham, Andrea Bargnani and Juan Dixon kept the Bobcats in check with Bargnani grabbing a career-high 11 rebounds and perhaps having his best game defensively of the season altering shots and chasing down loose balls.
The Raps of course caught a break when Emeka Okafor, who dominated Toronto on the glass, left the game in the second half with a strained left calf and Gerald Wallace left soon after with a strained groin.
But it probably wouldn’t have mattered as soon as Chris Bosh came back into the game in the second half. Bosh scored all 24 of his points in the second half and added 11 rebounds for the game and with the starting cast back in place, never looked back.
Toronto now sits at 18 and six after losing its first game of the New Year to Phoenix, the third best record in the league since that point behind only Dallas and the aforementioned Suns. And the best thing about this is that even in wins like last night’s sloppy affair, the Raptors seem to be focussing on improving different parts of their game if others are struggling. The Raptors shot a respectable 44.9 per cent for the game from the field but what was really impressive was the fact that they held the Bobcats, even undermanned, to only 32.9 per cent. Even newcomer Juan Dixon seems to have already bought into the defensive mentality as at times last night he could be seen fervently trapping his man along with the likes of Ford and Calderon.
Calderon and Ford switched gears from Friday night and while only had seven assists between them, they did put up 31 points together. And despite playing only eight minutes, fans once again got a look at just what Joey Graham can do...as a power forward.
Sam Mitchell used Graham at the 4 in a smaller lineup and Graham responded. Joey still needs to pick his spots when being aggressive (should have dunked a missed lay-up/picked up four quick fouls) but I’d like to see Sam use Graham down low more often. He looks much more comfortable closer to the basket and perhaps we might see more of a small lineup with him at the 4 and Dixon and Peterson/Parker at the 2 and 3 spots.
And how did Dixon fare? Well he looked a bit rusty going 0 for 3 but he did see 16 minutes of court time. It will be interesting to see how many minutes he gets heading into two huge games this week for the Raps against San Antonio and Houston.
As a follow-up to the Dixon/Jones trade, Matt from Blazersblog and I discussed the swap and he answered a few questions for me concerning Dixon:
Hey Matt, why do you think Portland made this deal?
For several reasons:
-Portland has needed some good PR in the worst way. The club bringing back a former University of Oregon star in Fred Jones makes everyone happy; even if he is a backup at best.
-Dixon wasn't bringing a whole lot to the table this year. People talk about him being a "good shooter", but in 131 games with Portland he shot 43% from the field and 37% from 3pt. That's a decent enough three point shot, but not "great".
-Dixon didn't have a long-term future with the team. He's a liability on defense because of his size, and with Brandon Roy and Martell Webster, Portland already has it's 2-guard of the future and its shooting specialist of the future.
-This allows Brandon Roy to slide over to PG and not have a liability on defense next to him.
-Throw in Freddy's commitment to not pick up the player option and the "future considerations", and it became a no-brainer.
-And, you can't talk about Freddy without mentioning his athleticism. A few crowd-pleasing throwdowns certainly won't hurt Rose Garden attendence.
Why wasn't Dixon fitting into the Blazers regular rotation?
Last year and the first half of this year, Portland needed someone to fill minutes while the youngsters matured. That's just not the case anymore. With Brandon Roy being ready to start full-time right now, Dixon became a bench player. And with Sergio Rodriguez taking over the backup PG position, you simply can't play Rodriguez and Dixon together; they're both too undersized. Add to that Martell Webster's slow maturation into being ready to be a bench player, and Nate McMillan's continuing emphasis on defense, and Dixon just didn't have a role. Portland has been trying to establish a regular rotation all season, and Rodriguez, Webster, Travis Outlaw and LaMarcus Aldridge all need more minutes off the bench at this point.
Will Fred Jones be a better fit with Portland?
Probably a little bit. There's going to be a monthlong-or-so honeymoon period with him, purely because he is a former Oregon Duck star. (I'm a U of Oregon alum myself, and I'm fairly giddy to see him in a Portland uniform. At Fred's press conference yesterday, he was saying things like "I used to lay in my room at night when I was a kid and dream about playing for Portland" and "I just can't wipe the smile off my face, I'm so happy to be here, and this team is going to get 110% of everything I've got.") I think the addition of Freddy sort of turns Portland from a 9-man rotation to a 10-man rotation, and I see him getting about 10-15 minutes per night off the bench, backing up Brandon Roy at the 2-guard and playing the "3" in the small lineup. Nate McMillan rewards players who work hard, and it sounds like Fred's going to do that. Honestly, you could make the argument that Portland has gone from one mediocre backup SG to another, but we're still excited about it.
What can Juan Dixon bring to the Raptors?
I may sound down on Dixon, but he does have some value. For a long period of time in Portland he was the starting 2, which won't be a problem for you guys, but that's too much for him to handle. He's a guy who you can tell right away if he's "on" that night, and should be used as a shooter off the bench. He can provide some decent three-point shooting to relax the defense a little off of your inside guys when he's on. But he doesn't add much beyond that; he's a mediocre passer, a decent ball-handler, and a poor defender. I'll say this, he isn't afraid to put it up, hot or cold. We called him "Stop Shooting Juan" for awhile there last season, but he did hit some big shots. And, he's a great character guy who’s overcome a lot of adversity in his life (drug-addicted mother growing up, father died young, etc).
If he doesn't get minutes, will that be a problem?
Not at all. To Juan's credit, he's been jerked around a little bit in Portland -- losing minutes to younger players, sporadic playing time, seldomly defined role, etc -- and has handled it very well with very minimal complaining. I think going to a team like Toronto who's in the thick of a playoff race will be good for him, he's a very solid guy who will just enjoys the competition.
Some great insight for sure and as part of my chat with Matt, I answered some questions of his on Freddie Jones too. While things didn’t work out with Freddie, all of us here at the HQ wish him best of luck in Portland. Matt also passed on a piece from Blazers’ beat writer Jason Quick:
*Make no mistake: Dixon was glad to be leaving Portland. He wanted a better playing situation and had become confused as to what McMillan wanted out of him. Although both remained civil toward each other - they shook hands and wished each other well after the trade - there was a definite and growing air of tension between the two this season.
McMillan denies that tension had anything to do with their tete-a-tete during a timeout on Jan. 19 in Phoenix, when he and Dixon argued over what was, and wasn't, a good shot. But when Dixon countered McMillan during the timeout, he was told he was being replaced in the game by Jarrett Jack. He never returned in that game, and really, never was a factor for the rest of the season.
"No, no, no,'' McMillan said when I asked him if that confrontation had anything to do with the trade. "I've had that conversation about what is a good shot with several of our players.''
McMillan insisted Dixon's massive reduction in minutes was due more to the emergence of Brandon Roy than anything else. Plus, McMillan said he could tell Dixon wanted out.
"I think he wanted this. He didn't say that to me, but I think he wanted to be moved,'' McMillan said. "He wanted the opportunity to go somewhere else and try to play. Brandon was doing some good things, and Brandon is the future of this organization, and I think Juan sensed that very quickly when he met Brandon and saw what Brandon could do. He sensed that Brandon was going to take a lot of minutes.''
Dixon, meanwhile, became so confused at his demotion that he often was left chuckling at his misfortune.
"When I got the opportunity to play, I thought I handled it well,'' Dixon said. "At times, I was inconsistent, but my minutes were inconsistent. After a while, I couldn't get a good feel for what coach wanted - I couldn't play my game. It's hard to play when you don't have confidence from your coach. So I think this is a good opportunity for me to get a fresh start.''
Dixon wanted to make it clear that he was experiencing mixed emotions about the trade. He was happy about getting that "fresh start", but he also said he was "sad" about leaving his teammates and the coaching staff.
"I have no hard feelings with Nate. He gave me an opportunity here, and last year I had career highs, and for that I have to thank Nate,'' Dixon said. "This is a business, and I know they have a plan with Brandon and their point guards, and it's a great plan. I enjoyed my time here, and I want to thank everyone for helping me. But sometimes, you just have to move on.''
With this in mind, it will be interesting to see the role Dixon plays as the season goes on. Best case scenario obviously would be for Dixon to become a Vinnie Johnson-esque scorer for Toronto off the bench, someone who could come in and give the team some energy and an offensive boost while being active on D. And the good thing is that it’s not out of the question for Dixon to fit this niche. It was less than two years ago that Dixon torched the Bulls while a member of the Wizards in their first-round playoff match.
The Raptors look to have one of the most cohesive lead and supporting casts in the league as is...let’s hope that Dixon becomes a solid role player as well.
FRANCHISE
11 comments
|
0 recs |
Do you like this story?
Comments
Franchise, how can you say it wouldn't have mattered if Okafor or G-Wall got hurt or not? I believe Bosh was held scoreless during the first half and the big reason for that was Okafor's presence. Also, when Charlotte was going small, Bosh had to cover G-Wall and did a very poor job. I'm not sure about you, bro, but if the Bobcats had stayed healthy, I think Toronto would have ended up with a loss.
by Hen on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
Hen - The thing is, Bosh played very little of the first half and it's doubtful he would have remained scoreless had he not gotten in foul trouble. Yes Okafor did a good job, but CB4 would have eventually gotten his regardless. And even if he hadn't, would it have mattered? In the second quarter, when Toronto was basically playing bench players 6 to 10, they were still BEATING a Charlotte team that had most of its starters in the game!
by Franchise on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
I have no Idea how this team (Bobcats) won 4 in a row.
With Bosh & Garbo only scoring 3 pts in the first half, the Rap's bench was able to outscore them by 3 points. Thanks mainly to the play of TJ/Jose/Andrea (26 pts) in 1st half. TJ/Jose outplayed/outscored the rival PG's to the tune of 31 to 11 points. No contest !!!
No way the Cats would have won with Okafor/Wallace for the whole game once Chris/Garbo came back in.
by Johnn19 on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
Either Freddie doesn't have the hops he once had, or he's gone soft. Because while he was in Toronto, he fell in love with the finger roll. I didn't see any electrifying dunks, and barely saw any dunks at all, for that matter. He's a good slasher and a very good free throw shooter, but he was I was surprised at his lack of explosiveness. I hope he'll be able to resurrect his game in Portland.
by FunkaRaptor on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
"Either Freddie doesn't have the hops he once had"
maybe He did a VC and just wanted out? That is the impression I got watching Him play, His body language was awful.Head down arms dragging little if any life in His face. The pleasure of the game seemed to be missing.Good luck to Freddie in Portland looking forward to watching Him play as He can but not against the Raptors
by Davl12 on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
I'm gonna have to disagree with you again on that. Who was covering Bosh when he went off on Charlotte? Jake Voskuhl? Hollins? That was when the Raptors really "won" this game. And Gerald Wallace missed a significant portion of the 2nd quarter that you all think we dominated with our bench.
I would love to give Chris the benefit of the doubt, and he did what a great player does, but I think it's unrealistic to make predictions on the outcome of the game when they lost two of their three starters.
Here's how you put it into perspective - do you really think the Raptors outrebound the Bobcats if those guys are still in the game? When's the last time we did that? Rebounding is a leading indicator for how a team has performed.
by Hen on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
Hey Hen: The leading indicator of how a team performed is the final score.
Raptors 93 Bobcats 76 + 17
NO CONTEST.
by Johnn19 on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
Hen - No, don't get me wrong, I see your point. I just don't think it would have mattered. Toronto might have only won by single digits, but I still think they would have won hands down. Toronto's been outrebounded quite a few times this year but has still come out with the win on many occasions. Rebounding's a key indicator for sure...but so is overall talent.
by Franchise on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
I'm sorry hen but, okafor and wallace were both out there for a good portion of the first half when our second unit was building a lead going into half-time. it's not we had to make a come back when chris returned. (and the rest of the starters, for that matter.)
the raps were never going to lose this one.
by papa on Feb 25, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
Really enjoyed the guest blogging. You guys should get more of that for a different perspective.
The raps would have won either way with/without Bosh, Okafor and Wallace. I was hoping Mitchell kept Bosh/Garbo out of the line up as long as the Raps were competitive. Once they made to the half, I knew the game was over. Okafor/Wallace wouldn't have the same energy to match what Bosh brought in the second half. It may not have been as dominant, but it still would have been on cruise control.
The Bobbies have no offence to speak of. We may have scored 3-4 less buckets.
by ustation on Feb 26, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions
Awesome idea of "interviewing" Matt from Blazerblog. This is exactly the type of information avid Raptor fans need and can't get in your typical sports news section. Fantastic job Franchise! Keep it up.
by benjo on Feb 26, 2007 12:00 AM EST reply actions

by 






















